Cargando…

Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION: In case of untreatable suffering at the end of life, continuous sedation until death (CSD) may be the only treatment option left. Because these patients cannot communicate anymore, caregivers have to rely on behavioral observation to assess the patient’s comfort. Recently, however, a n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Six, Stefaan, Laureys, Steven, Poelaert, Jan, Maîresse, Olivier, Theuns, Peter, Bilsen, Johan, Deschepper, Reginald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z
_version_ 1783691881259991040
author Six, Stefaan
Laureys, Steven
Poelaert, Jan
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
author_facet Six, Stefaan
Laureys, Steven
Poelaert, Jan
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
author_sort Six, Stefaan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In case of untreatable suffering at the end of life, continuous sedation until death (CSD) may be the only treatment option left. Because these patients cannot communicate anymore, caregivers have to rely on behavioral observation to assess the patient’s comfort. Recently, however, a number of studies from the neurosciences have shown that sometimes consciousness and pain are undetectable with these traditional behavioral methods. The aim of this study was to find out if subjective caregiver assessments of consciousness and pain would be confirmed by objective neurophysiological measures. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we observed patients from the start of palliative sedation until death. Subjective caregiver assessments of level of consciousness and pain based on behavioral observations were compared with objective measures from neurophysiological monitoring devices. RESULTS: We collected and analyzed 108 subjective caregiver assessments in a sample of 12 patients and 32 assessments by traditionally used observational scales. We compared these with objective neurophysiological measures. Sensitivity and specificity of caregivers’ subjective assessments of consciousness was 23.6 and 91.1% respectively, with an accuracy of 54.0% and interrater reliability (κ) of 0.13. For pain, this was 0 and 94.79%, respectively, an accuracy of 88%, and an inter-rater reliability (κ) of − 0.063. Agreement between caregivers’ subjective assessments and objective neurophysiological measures of consciousness and pain was very poor. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers’ subjective assessment of level of consciousness and pain during CSD is unreliable compared with objective neurophysiological monitoring. Our results suggest that assessments of patient comfort during CSD could have been improved substantially by including objective monitoring of level of consciousness and pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this observational study has been registered retrospectively at Clinical-Trials.gov (ID NCT03273244).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8119559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81195592021-05-14 Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study Six, Stefaan Laureys, Steven Poelaert, Jan Maîresse, Olivier Theuns, Peter Bilsen, Johan Deschepper, Reginald Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: In case of untreatable suffering at the end of life, continuous sedation until death (CSD) may be the only treatment option left. Because these patients cannot communicate anymore, caregivers have to rely on behavioral observation to assess the patient’s comfort. Recently, however, a number of studies from the neurosciences have shown that sometimes consciousness and pain are undetectable with these traditional behavioral methods. The aim of this study was to find out if subjective caregiver assessments of consciousness and pain would be confirmed by objective neurophysiological measures. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we observed patients from the start of palliative sedation until death. Subjective caregiver assessments of level of consciousness and pain based on behavioral observations were compared with objective measures from neurophysiological monitoring devices. RESULTS: We collected and analyzed 108 subjective caregiver assessments in a sample of 12 patients and 32 assessments by traditionally used observational scales. We compared these with objective neurophysiological measures. Sensitivity and specificity of caregivers’ subjective assessments of consciousness was 23.6 and 91.1% respectively, with an accuracy of 54.0% and interrater reliability (κ) of 0.13. For pain, this was 0 and 94.79%, respectively, an accuracy of 88%, and an inter-rater reliability (κ) of − 0.063. Agreement between caregivers’ subjective assessments and objective neurophysiological measures of consciousness and pain was very poor. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers’ subjective assessment of level of consciousness and pain during CSD is unreliable compared with objective neurophysiological monitoring. Our results suggest that assessments of patient comfort during CSD could have been improved substantially by including objective monitoring of level of consciousness and pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this observational study has been registered retrospectively at Clinical-Trials.gov (ID NCT03273244). Springer Healthcare 2020-11-05 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8119559/ /pubmed/33151515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Six, Stefaan
Laureys, Steven
Poelaert, Jan
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort neurophysiological assessments during continuous sedation until death put validity of observational assessments into question: a prospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sixstefaan neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT laureyssteven neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT poelaertjan neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mairesseolivier neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT theunspeter neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bilsenjohan neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT deschepperreginald neurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy