Cargando…

Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect

We previously reported the development of an osteogenic bone filler scaffold consisting of degradable polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bovine bone particles. The current study was aimed at evaluating the use of this scaffold as a means of local antibiotic delivery to prevent infectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beenken, Karen E., Campbell, Mara J., Ramirez, Aura M., Alghazali, Karrar, Walker, Christopher M., Jackson, Bailey, Griffin, Christopher, King, William, Bourdo, Shawn E., Rifkin, Rebecca, Hecht, Silke, Meeker, Daniel G., Anderson, David E., Biris, Alexandru S., Smeltzer, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33986462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89830-z
_version_ 1783691914784014336
author Beenken, Karen E.
Campbell, Mara J.
Ramirez, Aura M.
Alghazali, Karrar
Walker, Christopher M.
Jackson, Bailey
Griffin, Christopher
King, William
Bourdo, Shawn E.
Rifkin, Rebecca
Hecht, Silke
Meeker, Daniel G.
Anderson, David E.
Biris, Alexandru S.
Smeltzer, Mark S.
author_facet Beenken, Karen E.
Campbell, Mara J.
Ramirez, Aura M.
Alghazali, Karrar
Walker, Christopher M.
Jackson, Bailey
Griffin, Christopher
King, William
Bourdo, Shawn E.
Rifkin, Rebecca
Hecht, Silke
Meeker, Daniel G.
Anderson, David E.
Biris, Alexandru S.
Smeltzer, Mark S.
author_sort Beenken, Karen E.
collection PubMed
description We previously reported the development of an osteogenic bone filler scaffold consisting of degradable polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bovine bone particles. The current study was aimed at evaluating the use of this scaffold as a means of local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in a bone defect contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. We evaluated two scaffold formulations with the same component ratios but differing overall porosity and surface area. Studies with vancomycin, daptomycin, and gentamicin confirmed that antibiotic uptake was concentration dependent and that increased porosity correlated with increased uptake and prolonged antibiotic release. We also demonstrate that vancomycin can be passively loaded into either formulation in sufficient concentration to prevent infection in a rabbit model of a contaminated segmental bone defect. Moreover, even in those few cases in which complete eradication was not achieved, the number of viable bacteria in the bone was significantly reduced by treatment and there was no radiographic evidence of osteomyelitis. Radiographs and microcomputed tomography (µCT) analysis from the in vivo studies also suggested that the addition of vancomycin did not have any significant effect on the scaffold itself. These results demonstrate the potential utility of our bone regeneration scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in contaminated bone defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8119729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81197292021-05-17 Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect Beenken, Karen E. Campbell, Mara J. Ramirez, Aura M. Alghazali, Karrar Walker, Christopher M. Jackson, Bailey Griffin, Christopher King, William Bourdo, Shawn E. Rifkin, Rebecca Hecht, Silke Meeker, Daniel G. Anderson, David E. Biris, Alexandru S. Smeltzer, Mark S. Sci Rep Article We previously reported the development of an osteogenic bone filler scaffold consisting of degradable polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bovine bone particles. The current study was aimed at evaluating the use of this scaffold as a means of local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in a bone defect contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. We evaluated two scaffold formulations with the same component ratios but differing overall porosity and surface area. Studies with vancomycin, daptomycin, and gentamicin confirmed that antibiotic uptake was concentration dependent and that increased porosity correlated with increased uptake and prolonged antibiotic release. We also demonstrate that vancomycin can be passively loaded into either formulation in sufficient concentration to prevent infection in a rabbit model of a contaminated segmental bone defect. Moreover, even in those few cases in which complete eradication was not achieved, the number of viable bacteria in the bone was significantly reduced by treatment and there was no radiographic evidence of osteomyelitis. Radiographs and microcomputed tomography (µCT) analysis from the in vivo studies also suggested that the addition of vancomycin did not have any significant effect on the scaffold itself. These results demonstrate the potential utility of our bone regeneration scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in contaminated bone defects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8119729/ /pubmed/33986462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89830-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Beenken, Karen E.
Campbell, Mara J.
Ramirez, Aura M.
Alghazali, Karrar
Walker, Christopher M.
Jackson, Bailey
Griffin, Christopher
King, William
Bourdo, Shawn E.
Rifkin, Rebecca
Hecht, Silke
Meeker, Daniel G.
Anderson, David E.
Biris, Alexandru S.
Smeltzer, Mark S.
Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title_full Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title_fullStr Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title_short Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
title_sort evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33986462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89830-z
work_keys_str_mv AT beenkenkarene evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT campbellmaraj evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT ramirezauram evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT alghazalikarrar evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT walkerchristopherm evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT jacksonbailey evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT griffinchristopher evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT kingwilliam evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT bourdoshawne evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT rifkinrebecca evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT hechtsilke evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT meekerdanielg evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT andersondavide evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT birisalexandrus evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect
AT smeltzermarks evaluationofabonefillerscaffoldforlocalantibioticdeliverytopreventstaphylococcusaureusinfectioninacontaminatedbonedefect