Cargando…

Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child

Conversation analysis (CA) of children-adult—interaction in various contexts has become an established field of research. However, child therapy has received limited attention in CA. In child therapy, the general psychotherapeutic practice of achieving empathy faces particular challenges. In relatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchholz, Michael B., Buchholz, Timo, Wülfing, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545966
_version_ 1783692041778102272
author Buchholz, Michael B.
Buchholz, Timo
Wülfing, Barbara
author_facet Buchholz, Michael B.
Buchholz, Timo
Wülfing, Barbara
author_sort Buchholz, Michael B.
collection PubMed
description Conversation analysis (CA) of children-adult—interaction in various contexts has become an established field of research. However, child therapy has received limited attention in CA. In child therapy, the general psychotherapeutic practice of achieving empathy faces particular challenges. In relation to this, our contribution sets out three issues for investigation and analysis: the first one is that practices of achieving empathy must be preceded by efforts aiming to establish which kind of individualized conversation works with this child (Midgley, 2006). Psychotherapy process researchers in adult therapy (Stiles et al., 2015) have found that therapists “invent” a new therapy for each patient (Norcross and Wampold, 2018). The second issue is that it can be difficult for adults to understand the ways in which children express their conflicts and issues. In particular, play activities in therapy, e.g., with dolls, can open up additional scenarios of interaction. The play scenario can be used to disclose unformulated problems masked in everyday and family interactions. The third issue is how to respect the child's higher degree of vulnerability, compared with adult patients. How is it communicated and dealt with in therapy? We present an interaction analysis of a single case study of the first 20 min of a child therapy session with an adopted girl aged 4 years brought to treatment because of “unexplainable rage.” The session was videotaped; parents granted permission. We analyze this session using an applied version of CA. In our analysis, we describe “doing contrariness,” as a conversational practice producing epistemic and affiliative disruptions, while “avoiding doing contrariness” and “remedying contrariness” are strategies for preserving or restoring the affiliative dimension of a relationship (in child therapy). We show how these practices operate in various modes and how they are used by both parties in our case study to variously aid and impedethe achievement of empathy and understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8120316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81203162021-05-15 Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child Buchholz, Michael B. Buchholz, Timo Wülfing, Barbara Front Psychol Psychology Conversation analysis (CA) of children-adult—interaction in various contexts has become an established field of research. However, child therapy has received limited attention in CA. In child therapy, the general psychotherapeutic practice of achieving empathy faces particular challenges. In relation to this, our contribution sets out three issues for investigation and analysis: the first one is that practices of achieving empathy must be preceded by efforts aiming to establish which kind of individualized conversation works with this child (Midgley, 2006). Psychotherapy process researchers in adult therapy (Stiles et al., 2015) have found that therapists “invent” a new therapy for each patient (Norcross and Wampold, 2018). The second issue is that it can be difficult for adults to understand the ways in which children express their conflicts and issues. In particular, play activities in therapy, e.g., with dolls, can open up additional scenarios of interaction. The play scenario can be used to disclose unformulated problems masked in everyday and family interactions. The third issue is how to respect the child's higher degree of vulnerability, compared with adult patients. How is it communicated and dealt with in therapy? We present an interaction analysis of a single case study of the first 20 min of a child therapy session with an adopted girl aged 4 years brought to treatment because of “unexplainable rage.” The session was videotaped; parents granted permission. We analyze this session using an applied version of CA. In our analysis, we describe “doing contrariness,” as a conversational practice producing epistemic and affiliative disruptions, while “avoiding doing contrariness” and “remedying contrariness” are strategies for preserving or restoring the affiliative dimension of a relationship (in child therapy). We show how these practices operate in various modes and how they are used by both parties in our case study to variously aid and impedethe achievement of empathy and understanding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8120316/ /pubmed/33995159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545966 Text en Copyright © 2021 Buchholz, Buchholz and Wülfing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Buchholz, Michael B.
Buchholz, Timo
Wülfing, Barbara
Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title_full Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title_fullStr Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title_full_unstemmed Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title_short Doing Contrariness: Therapeutic Talk-In-Interaction in a Single Therapy Session With a Traumatized Child
title_sort doing contrariness: therapeutic talk-in-interaction in a single therapy session with a traumatized child
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545966
work_keys_str_mv AT buchholzmichaelb doingcontrarinesstherapeutictalkininteractioninasingletherapysessionwithatraumatizedchild
AT buchholztimo doingcontrarinesstherapeutictalkininteractioninasingletherapysessionwithatraumatizedchild
AT wulfingbarbara doingcontrarinesstherapeutictalkininteractioninasingletherapysessionwithatraumatizedchild