Cargando…

Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia

IMPORTANCE: Adults with dementia may experience poorer quality of chronic disease management because of the difficulty in reporting symptoms and engaging in shared decision-making associated with cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of chronic disease management received by adults...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gotanda, Hiroshi, Nuckols, Teryl, Mori, Kanon, Tsugawa, Yusuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9622
_version_ 1783692044963676160
author Gotanda, Hiroshi
Nuckols, Teryl
Mori, Kanon
Tsugawa, Yusuke
author_facet Gotanda, Hiroshi
Nuckols, Teryl
Mori, Kanon
Tsugawa, Yusuke
author_sort Gotanda, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Adults with dementia may experience poorer quality of chronic disease management because of the difficulty in reporting symptoms and engaging in shared decision-making associated with cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of chronic disease management received by adults with and without dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this cross-sectional study, nationally representative data from noninstitutionalized patients 65 years or older were obtained from the 2002-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The control group comprised adults of similarly limited life expectancy without dementia comprised . Data analysis was performed in June 2020. EXPOSURES: Dementia diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Quality of chronic disease management based on 14 individual quality indicators. The association between dementia status and the quality of chronic disease management (3 composite categories: preventive care, diabetes care, and medication treatment) was examined using multivariable linear regression models. Survey weights, sampling strata, and primary sampling unit variables were used to produce national estimates adjusted for nonresponse. RESULTS: This study included 2506 adults (mean [SD] age, 81.4 [4.7] years; 1259 [49.3%] female; 1243 [50.7%] male), of whom 1335 (53.3%) had a diagnosis of dementia and 1171 (46.7%) did not have a diagnosis of dementia. After adjusting for potential confounders, adults with dementia received lower-quality preventive care compared with adults of similar life expectancy without dementia (adjusted absolute difference [aAD], −6.1 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, −9.7 to −2.5 pp; P = .001). We found no evidence that the quality of care differed in diabetes care (aAD, 1.7 pp; 95% CI, −4.5 to 7.9 pp; P = .59) and medication treatment (aAD, 1.0 pp; 95% CI, −5.0 to 7.0 pp; P = .75). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, the quality of chronic disease management for adults with dementia was not substantially different from that for those without dementia despite potential barriers. Future studies are warranted to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of these findings for preventive care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8120327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81203272021-05-14 Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia Gotanda, Hiroshi Nuckols, Teryl Mori, Kanon Tsugawa, Yusuke JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Adults with dementia may experience poorer quality of chronic disease management because of the difficulty in reporting symptoms and engaging in shared decision-making associated with cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of chronic disease management received by adults with and without dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this cross-sectional study, nationally representative data from noninstitutionalized patients 65 years or older were obtained from the 2002-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The control group comprised adults of similarly limited life expectancy without dementia comprised . Data analysis was performed in June 2020. EXPOSURES: Dementia diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Quality of chronic disease management based on 14 individual quality indicators. The association between dementia status and the quality of chronic disease management (3 composite categories: preventive care, diabetes care, and medication treatment) was examined using multivariable linear regression models. Survey weights, sampling strata, and primary sampling unit variables were used to produce national estimates adjusted for nonresponse. RESULTS: This study included 2506 adults (mean [SD] age, 81.4 [4.7] years; 1259 [49.3%] female; 1243 [50.7%] male), of whom 1335 (53.3%) had a diagnosis of dementia and 1171 (46.7%) did not have a diagnosis of dementia. After adjusting for potential confounders, adults with dementia received lower-quality preventive care compared with adults of similar life expectancy without dementia (adjusted absolute difference [aAD], −6.1 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, −9.7 to −2.5 pp; P = .001). We found no evidence that the quality of care differed in diabetes care (aAD, 1.7 pp; 95% CI, −4.5 to 7.9 pp; P = .59) and medication treatment (aAD, 1.0 pp; 95% CI, −5.0 to 7.0 pp; P = .75). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, the quality of chronic disease management for adults with dementia was not substantially different from that for those without dementia despite potential barriers. Future studies are warranted to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of these findings for preventive care. American Medical Association 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8120327/ /pubmed/33983400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9622 Text en Copyright 2021 Gotanda H et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Gotanda, Hiroshi
Nuckols, Teryl
Mori, Kanon
Tsugawa, Yusuke
Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title_full Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title_fullStr Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title_short Comparison of the Quality of Chronic Disease Management Between Adults With and Without Dementia
title_sort comparison of the quality of chronic disease management between adults with and without dementia
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9622
work_keys_str_mv AT gotandahiroshi comparisonofthequalityofchronicdiseasemanagementbetweenadultswithandwithoutdementia
AT nuckolsteryl comparisonofthequalityofchronicdiseasemanagementbetweenadultswithandwithoutdementia
AT morikanon comparisonofthequalityofchronicdiseasemanagementbetweenadultswithandwithoutdementia
AT tsugawayusuke comparisonofthequalityofchronicdiseasemanagementbetweenadultswithandwithoutdementia