Cargando…

SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compare the effect of SGLT2i with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and find whether combination of SGLT2i and ARNI is better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Yuling, Liu, Bin, Du, Jun, Wang, Jing, Jing, Xiaodong, Liu, Yajie, Deng, Songbai, Du, Jianlin, She, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13313
_version_ 1783692081685856256
author Yan, Yuling
Liu, Bin
Du, Jun
Wang, Jing
Jing, Xiaodong
Liu, Yajie
Deng, Songbai
Du, Jianlin
She, Qiang
author_facet Yan, Yuling
Liu, Bin
Du, Jun
Wang, Jing
Jing, Xiaodong
Liu, Yajie
Deng, Songbai
Du, Jianlin
She, Qiang
author_sort Yan, Yuling
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compare the effect of SGLT2i with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and find whether combination of SGLT2i and ARNI is better than monotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating SGLT2i or ARNI in HFrEF. And a total of six trials were included. SGLT2i was found to significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 27% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.80], hospitalization for heart failure by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.77), cardiovascular death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95), and all‐cause death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75–0.94) in HFrEF only with a statistically higher risk of genital infection (risk ratio (RR) 2.78, 95% CI 1.46–5.29). The reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was of similar magnitude in patients with or without diabetes mellitus (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.80 vs. HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) using SGLT2i. Indirect treatment comparison showed that SGLT2i and ARNI had similar effects on primary outcome (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82–1.06). And combination of SGLT2i and ARNI achieved a better prognosis performance (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.89) compared with ARNI monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i could safely reduce cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in HFrEF regardless of diabetes mellitus status. SGLT2i and ARNI demonstrate similar effects, while combination of SGLT2i and ARNI results in a better cardiovascular protective effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8120387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81203872021-05-21 SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Yan, Yuling Liu, Bin Du, Jun Wang, Jing Jing, Xiaodong Liu, Yajie Deng, Songbai Du, Jianlin She, Qiang ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compare the effect of SGLT2i with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and find whether combination of SGLT2i and ARNI is better than monotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating SGLT2i or ARNI in HFrEF. And a total of six trials were included. SGLT2i was found to significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 27% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.80], hospitalization for heart failure by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.77), cardiovascular death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95), and all‐cause death by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75–0.94) in HFrEF only with a statistically higher risk of genital infection (risk ratio (RR) 2.78, 95% CI 1.46–5.29). The reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was of similar magnitude in patients with or without diabetes mellitus (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.80 vs. HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) using SGLT2i. Indirect treatment comparison showed that SGLT2i and ARNI had similar effects on primary outcome (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82–1.06). And combination of SGLT2i and ARNI achieved a better prognosis performance (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.89) compared with ARNI monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i could safely reduce cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in HFrEF regardless of diabetes mellitus status. SGLT2i and ARNI demonstrate similar effects, while combination of SGLT2i and ARNI results in a better cardiovascular protective effect. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8120387/ /pubmed/33749159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13313 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Yan, Yuling
Liu, Bin
Du, Jun
Wang, Jing
Jing, Xiaodong
Liu, Yajie
Deng, Songbai
Du, Jianlin
She, Qiang
SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short SGLT2i versus ARNI in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort sglt2i versus arni in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13313
work_keys_str_mv AT yanyuling sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liubin sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dujun sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjing sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingxiaodong sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyajie sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengsongbai sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dujianlin sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheqiang sglt2iversusarniinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis