Cargando…

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence

BACKGROUND: The use of appropriate preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of surgical site infections (SSI); however, the breadth of plastic surgery procedures makes it challenging to ensure appropriate use for each unique procedure type. Currently, plastic surgeons lack a cohesive a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mankowski, Peter, Cherukupalli, Abhiram, Slater, Karen, Carr, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2292550321997005
_version_ 1783692132966465536
author Mankowski, Peter
Cherukupalli, Abhiram
Slater, Karen
Carr, Nick
author_facet Mankowski, Peter
Cherukupalli, Abhiram
Slater, Karen
Carr, Nick
author_sort Mankowski, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of appropriate preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of surgical site infections (SSI); however, the breadth of plastic surgery procedures makes it challenging to ensure appropriate use for each unique procedure type. Currently, plastic surgeons lack a cohesive and comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) for surgical prophylaxis. We sought to profile the perioperative antibiotic prescribing patterns for plastic surgeons in British Columbia to investigate if they are congruent with published recommendations. In doing so, we aim to determine risk factors for antibiotic overprescribing in the context of surgical prophylaxis. METHODS: A literature review identifying EBG for antibiotic prophylaxis use during common plastic surgery procedures was performed. Concurrently, a provincial survey of plastic surgery residents, fellows, academic and community plastic surgeons was used to identify their antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing practices. These findings were then compared to recommendations identified from our review. The compliance of the provincial plastic surgery community with current EBG was determined for 38 surgical scenarios to identify which clinical factors and procedure types were associated with unsupported antibiotic use. RESULTS: Within the literature, 31 of the 38 categories of surveyed plastic surgery operations have EBG for use of prophylactic antibiotics. When surgical procedures have EBG, 19.5% of plastic surgery trainees and 21.9% of practicing plastic surgeons followed recommended prophylaxis use. Average adherence to EBG was 59.1% for hand procedures, 24.1% for breast procedures, and 23.9% for craniofacial procedures. Breast reconstruction procedures and contaminated craniofacial procedures were associated with a significant reduction in adherence to EBG resulting in excessive antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: Even when evidence-based recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis exist, plastic surgeons demonstrate variable compliance based on their reported prescribing practices. Surgical procedures with low EBG compliance may reflect risk avoidant behaviors in practicing surgeons and highlight the importance of improving education on the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis in these clinical situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8120557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81205572021-05-21 Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence Mankowski, Peter Cherukupalli, Abhiram Slater, Karen Carr, Nick Plast Surg (Oakv) Original Articles BACKGROUND: The use of appropriate preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of surgical site infections (SSI); however, the breadth of plastic surgery procedures makes it challenging to ensure appropriate use for each unique procedure type. Currently, plastic surgeons lack a cohesive and comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) for surgical prophylaxis. We sought to profile the perioperative antibiotic prescribing patterns for plastic surgeons in British Columbia to investigate if they are congruent with published recommendations. In doing so, we aim to determine risk factors for antibiotic overprescribing in the context of surgical prophylaxis. METHODS: A literature review identifying EBG for antibiotic prophylaxis use during common plastic surgery procedures was performed. Concurrently, a provincial survey of plastic surgery residents, fellows, academic and community plastic surgeons was used to identify their antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing practices. These findings were then compared to recommendations identified from our review. The compliance of the provincial plastic surgery community with current EBG was determined for 38 surgical scenarios to identify which clinical factors and procedure types were associated with unsupported antibiotic use. RESULTS: Within the literature, 31 of the 38 categories of surveyed plastic surgery operations have EBG for use of prophylactic antibiotics. When surgical procedures have EBG, 19.5% of plastic surgery trainees and 21.9% of practicing plastic surgeons followed recommended prophylaxis use. Average adherence to EBG was 59.1% for hand procedures, 24.1% for breast procedures, and 23.9% for craniofacial procedures. Breast reconstruction procedures and contaminated craniofacial procedures were associated with a significant reduction in adherence to EBG resulting in excessive antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: Even when evidence-based recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis exist, plastic surgeons demonstrate variable compliance based on their reported prescribing practices. Surgical procedures with low EBG compliance may reflect risk avoidant behaviors in practicing surgeons and highlight the importance of improving education on the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis in these clinical situations. SAGE Publications 2021-03-02 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8120557/ /pubmed/34026678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2292550321997005 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mankowski, Peter
Cherukupalli, Abhiram
Slater, Karen
Carr, Nick
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title_full Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title_fullStr Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title_short Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence
title_sort antibiotic prophylaxis in plastic surgery correlation between practice and evidence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2292550321997005
work_keys_str_mv AT mankowskipeter antibioticprophylaxisinplasticsurgerycorrelationbetweenpracticeandevidence
AT cherukupalliabhiram antibioticprophylaxisinplasticsurgerycorrelationbetweenpracticeandevidence
AT slaterkaren antibioticprophylaxisinplasticsurgerycorrelationbetweenpracticeandevidence
AT carrnick antibioticprophylaxisinplasticsurgerycorrelationbetweenpracticeandevidence