Cargando…

A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study

BACKGROUND: Spinal stiffness assessment has the potential to become an important clinical measure. Various spinal stiffness-testing devices are available to help researchers objectively evaluate the spine and patient complaints. One of these is VerteTrack, a device capable of measuring posteroanteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadizadeh, Maliheh, Kawchuk, Greg, French, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6
_version_ 1783692203925700608
author Hadizadeh, Maliheh
Kawchuk, Greg
French, Simon
author_facet Hadizadeh, Maliheh
Kawchuk, Greg
French, Simon
author_sort Hadizadeh, Maliheh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal stiffness assessment has the potential to become an important clinical measure. Various spinal stiffness-testing devices are available to help researchers objectively evaluate the spine and patient complaints. One of these is VerteTrack, a device capable of measuring posteroanterior displacement values over an entire spinal region. This study aimed to develop a best-practice protocol for evaluating spinal stiffness in human participants using VerteTrack. METHODS: Twenty-five individuals with research experience in measuring spinal stiffness, or who were trained in spinal stiffness measurement using the VerteTrack device, were invited to participate in this 3-Round Delphi study. Answers to open-ended questions in Round 1 were thematically analyzed and translated into statements about VerteTrack operation for spinal stiffness measurements. Participants then rated their level of agreement with these statements using a 5-point Likert scale in Rounds 2 and 3. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of the participants either strongly agreed, agreed, (or strongly disagreed, disagreed) to include a statement in the final protocol. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed Round 1 (80%). All these participants completed Rounds 2 and 3. In total, the pre-defined consensus threshold was reached for 67.2% (123/183) of statements after three rounds of surveys. From this, a best-practice protocol was created. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Delphi approach, a consensus-based protocol for measuring spinal stiffness using the VerteTrack was developed. This standard protocol will help to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of spinal stiffness measurements, facilitate the training of new operators, increase consistency of these measurements in multicenter studies, and provide the synergy and potential for data comparison between spine studies internationally. Although specific to VerteTrack, the resulting standard protocol could be modified for use with other devices designed to collect spinal stiffness measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8120899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81208992021-05-17 A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study Hadizadeh, Maliheh Kawchuk, Greg French, Simon BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Spinal stiffness assessment has the potential to become an important clinical measure. Various spinal stiffness-testing devices are available to help researchers objectively evaluate the spine and patient complaints. One of these is VerteTrack, a device capable of measuring posteroanterior displacement values over an entire spinal region. This study aimed to develop a best-practice protocol for evaluating spinal stiffness in human participants using VerteTrack. METHODS: Twenty-five individuals with research experience in measuring spinal stiffness, or who were trained in spinal stiffness measurement using the VerteTrack device, were invited to participate in this 3-Round Delphi study. Answers to open-ended questions in Round 1 were thematically analyzed and translated into statements about VerteTrack operation for spinal stiffness measurements. Participants then rated their level of agreement with these statements using a 5-point Likert scale in Rounds 2 and 3. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of the participants either strongly agreed, agreed, (or strongly disagreed, disagreed) to include a statement in the final protocol. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed Round 1 (80%). All these participants completed Rounds 2 and 3. In total, the pre-defined consensus threshold was reached for 67.2% (123/183) of statements after three rounds of surveys. From this, a best-practice protocol was created. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Delphi approach, a consensus-based protocol for measuring spinal stiffness using the VerteTrack was developed. This standard protocol will help to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of spinal stiffness measurements, facilitate the training of new operators, increase consistency of these measurements in multicenter studies, and provide the synergy and potential for data comparison between spine studies internationally. Although specific to VerteTrack, the resulting standard protocol could be modified for use with other devices designed to collect spinal stiffness measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6. BioMed Central 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8120899/ /pubmed/33985464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hadizadeh, Maliheh
Kawchuk, Greg
French, Simon
A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title_full A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title_fullStr A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title_short A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study
title_sort consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a delphi study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hadizadehmaliheh aconsensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy
AT kawchukgreg aconsensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy
AT frenchsimon aconsensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy
AT hadizadehmaliheh consensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy
AT kawchukgreg consensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy
AT frenchsimon consensusapproachtowardthestandardizationofspinalstiffnessmeasurementusingaloadedrollingwheeldeviceresultsofadelphistudy