Cargando…
A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good?
BACKGROUND: As most health professions in the United States have adopted clinical or practice doctorates, there has been an ongoing debate on whether physician assistants (PAs) should transition from a master’s to a doctorate as the terminal degree. The authors examined perceived risks, benefits and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02725-5 |
_version_ | 1783692204900876288 |
---|---|
author | Kulo, Violet Fleming, Shani Gordes, Karen L. Jun, Hyun-Jin Cawley, James F. Kayingo, Gerald |
author_facet | Kulo, Violet Fleming, Shani Gordes, Karen L. Jun, Hyun-Jin Cawley, James F. Kayingo, Gerald |
author_sort | Kulo, Violet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As most health professions in the United States have adopted clinical or practice doctorates, there has been an ongoing debate on whether physician assistants (PAs) should transition from a master’s to a doctorate as the terminal degree. The authors examined perceived risks, benefits and impact of transitioning to an entry-level PA doctoral degree. METHODS: A multi-prong, mixed-methods approach was used that included a literature review and collecting quantitative and qualitative data using a survey and interviews. Bivariate analysis and binomial logistic regression were performed to evaluate relationships between perceptions/perspectives on an entry-level PA doctoral degree and the anticipated impact of it causing more harm than good to the PA profession. Deductive content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Of 636 PA clinicians and students (46% response rate), 457 (72%) disagreed that an entry-level PA doctoral degree should be required. More than half of the respondents (54%) agreed that it should be offered but not required and 380 respondents (60%) agreed that an entry-level doctoral degree would cause more harm than good. Race, educational attainment, occupation, and length of practice as a PA were significantly associated with having a perception of causing more harm. There was strong positive association between the perception of a doctoral degree causing more harm with expectations of having a negative impact on the availability of clinical training sites (OR = 4.39, p < .05). The most commonly cited benefits were parity with other professions and competitive advantage, whereas the perceived risks were increased cost for education, decreased diversity in the profession, and negative impact on the PA/physician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The major takeaway of our study was that perceived benefits and risks are strongly influenced by the lens of the stakeholder. While the majority of PAs and students appear to be not in favor mainly due to the potential harm, the proportion of those in favor is not insignificant and their views should not be ignored. Addressing concerns with key stakeholders could help the PA profession to transition to a doctoral degree with minimal adverse impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8120902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81209022021-05-17 A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? Kulo, Violet Fleming, Shani Gordes, Karen L. Jun, Hyun-Jin Cawley, James F. Kayingo, Gerald BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: As most health professions in the United States have adopted clinical or practice doctorates, there has been an ongoing debate on whether physician assistants (PAs) should transition from a master’s to a doctorate as the terminal degree. The authors examined perceived risks, benefits and impact of transitioning to an entry-level PA doctoral degree. METHODS: A multi-prong, mixed-methods approach was used that included a literature review and collecting quantitative and qualitative data using a survey and interviews. Bivariate analysis and binomial logistic regression were performed to evaluate relationships between perceptions/perspectives on an entry-level PA doctoral degree and the anticipated impact of it causing more harm than good to the PA profession. Deductive content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Of 636 PA clinicians and students (46% response rate), 457 (72%) disagreed that an entry-level PA doctoral degree should be required. More than half of the respondents (54%) agreed that it should be offered but not required and 380 respondents (60%) agreed that an entry-level doctoral degree would cause more harm than good. Race, educational attainment, occupation, and length of practice as a PA were significantly associated with having a perception of causing more harm. There was strong positive association between the perception of a doctoral degree causing more harm with expectations of having a negative impact on the availability of clinical training sites (OR = 4.39, p < .05). The most commonly cited benefits were parity with other professions and competitive advantage, whereas the perceived risks were increased cost for education, decreased diversity in the profession, and negative impact on the PA/physician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The major takeaway of our study was that perceived benefits and risks are strongly influenced by the lens of the stakeholder. While the majority of PAs and students appear to be not in favor mainly due to the potential harm, the proportion of those in favor is not insignificant and their views should not be ignored. Addressing concerns with key stakeholders could help the PA profession to transition to a doctoral degree with minimal adverse impact. BioMed Central 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8120902/ /pubmed/33985497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02725-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kulo, Violet Fleming, Shani Gordes, Karen L. Jun, Hyun-Jin Cawley, James F. Kayingo, Gerald A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title | A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title_full | A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title_fullStr | A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title_full_unstemmed | A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title_short | A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
title_sort | physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02725-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuloviolet aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT flemingshani aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT gordeskarenl aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT junhyunjin aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT cawleyjamesf aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT kayingogerald aphysicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT kuloviolet physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT flemingshani physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT gordeskarenl physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT junhyunjin physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT cawleyjamesf physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood AT kayingogerald physicianassistantentryleveldoctoraldegreemoreharmthangood |