Cargando…
Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857 |
_version_ | 1783692389489049600 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Qiang Shi, HaoYu Jia, Qi Tian, Yueyi Zhi, Keqian Zhang, Lu |
author_facet | Dong, Qiang Shi, HaoYu Jia, Qi Tian, Yueyi Zhi, Keqian Zhang, Lu |
author_sort | Dong, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned to two groups according to the size of ANB angle: skeletal class I (2° < ANB angle < 5°) and skeletal class II (5° < ANB angle < 8°). After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, 31 landmarks and 25 measurement items were determined by In Vivo Dental 5.1 software (Anatomage, CA) for statistical analysis. The results were as follows: Co-Go, Go-Me, and CdM-CdD in skeletal class II cases were smaller than those in skeletal class I, and GoR-Me-GoL, GoR-Me-CoL, and, Ig-Men were larger than those in skeletal class I cases. In conclusion, there were significant differences in the three-dimensional morphology of the mandible between skeletal class I and class II patients. The vertical growth of the ramus, the horizontal growth of the mandibular body, and the condyle in skeletal class II patients were smaller than those in skeletal class I cases. In skeletal class II, the growth of the anterior part of the mandible in the vertical direction was larger than that in skeletal class I, and the shape of the mandible was more extended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8121591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81215912021-05-25 Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method Dong, Qiang Shi, HaoYu Jia, Qi Tian, Yueyi Zhi, Keqian Zhang, Lu Scanning Research Article This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned to two groups according to the size of ANB angle: skeletal class I (2° < ANB angle < 5°) and skeletal class II (5° < ANB angle < 8°). After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, 31 landmarks and 25 measurement items were determined by In Vivo Dental 5.1 software (Anatomage, CA) for statistical analysis. The results were as follows: Co-Go, Go-Me, and CdM-CdD in skeletal class II cases were smaller than those in skeletal class I, and GoR-Me-GoL, GoR-Me-CoL, and, Ig-Men were larger than those in skeletal class I cases. In conclusion, there were significant differences in the three-dimensional morphology of the mandible between skeletal class I and class II patients. The vertical growth of the ramus, the horizontal growth of the mandibular body, and the condyle in skeletal class II patients were smaller than those in skeletal class I cases. In skeletal class II, the growth of the anterior part of the mandible in the vertical direction was larger than that in skeletal class I, and the shape of the mandible was more extended. Hindawi 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8121591/ /pubmed/34040691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qiang Dong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dong, Qiang Shi, HaoYu Jia, Qi Tian, Yueyi Zhi, Keqian Zhang, Lu Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title | Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title_full | Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title_short | Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method |
title_sort | analysis of three-dimensional morphological differences in the mandible between skeletal class i and class ii with cbct fixed-point measurement method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongqiang analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod AT shihaoyu analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod AT jiaqi analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod AT tianyueyi analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod AT zhikeqian analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod AT zhanglu analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod |