Cargando…

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method

This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Qiang, Shi, HaoYu, Jia, Qi, Tian, Yueyi, Zhi, Keqian, Zhang, Lu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857
_version_ 1783692389489049600
author Dong, Qiang
Shi, HaoYu
Jia, Qi
Tian, Yueyi
Zhi, Keqian
Zhang, Lu
author_facet Dong, Qiang
Shi, HaoYu
Jia, Qi
Tian, Yueyi
Zhi, Keqian
Zhang, Lu
author_sort Dong, Qiang
collection PubMed
description This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned to two groups according to the size of ANB angle: skeletal class I (2° < ANB angle < 5°) and skeletal class II (5° < ANB angle < 8°). After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, 31 landmarks and 25 measurement items were determined by In Vivo Dental 5.1 software (Anatomage, CA) for statistical analysis. The results were as follows: Co-Go, Go-Me, and CdM-CdD in skeletal class II cases were smaller than those in skeletal class I, and GoR-Me-GoL, GoR-Me-CoL, and, Ig-Men were larger than those in skeletal class I cases. In conclusion, there were significant differences in the three-dimensional morphology of the mandible between skeletal class I and class II patients. The vertical growth of the ramus, the horizontal growth of the mandibular body, and the condyle in skeletal class II patients were smaller than those in skeletal class I cases. In skeletal class II, the growth of the anterior part of the mandible in the vertical direction was larger than that in skeletal class I, and the shape of the mandible was more extended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8121591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81215912021-05-25 Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method Dong, Qiang Shi, HaoYu Jia, Qi Tian, Yueyi Zhi, Keqian Zhang, Lu Scanning Research Article This study was aimed at determining the three-dimensional differences in the mandible morphology between skeletal class I and II patients, at exploring the pathogenic mechanisms and morphological characteristics of skeletal class II, and at providing clinical references. The subjects were assigned to two groups according to the size of ANB angle: skeletal class I (2° < ANB angle < 5°) and skeletal class II (5° < ANB angle < 8°). After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, 31 landmarks and 25 measurement items were determined by In Vivo Dental 5.1 software (Anatomage, CA) for statistical analysis. The results were as follows: Co-Go, Go-Me, and CdM-CdD in skeletal class II cases were smaller than those in skeletal class I, and GoR-Me-GoL, GoR-Me-CoL, and, Ig-Men were larger than those in skeletal class I cases. In conclusion, there were significant differences in the three-dimensional morphology of the mandible between skeletal class I and class II patients. The vertical growth of the ramus, the horizontal growth of the mandibular body, and the condyle in skeletal class II patients were smaller than those in skeletal class I cases. In skeletal class II, the growth of the anterior part of the mandible in the vertical direction was larger than that in skeletal class I, and the shape of the mandible was more extended. Hindawi 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8121591/ /pubmed/34040691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qiang Dong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dong, Qiang
Shi, HaoYu
Jia, Qi
Tian, Yueyi
Zhi, Keqian
Zhang, Lu
Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title_full Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title_fullStr Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title_short Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method
title_sort analysis of three-dimensional morphological differences in the mandible between skeletal class i and class ii with cbct fixed-point measurement method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996857
work_keys_str_mv AT dongqiang analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod
AT shihaoyu analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod
AT jiaqi analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod
AT tianyueyi analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod
AT zhikeqian analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod
AT zhanglu analysisofthreedimensionalmorphologicaldifferencesinthemandiblebetweenskeletalclassiandclassiiwithcbctfixedpointmeasurementmethod