Cargando…

Non-cancer clinical trials start-up metrics at an academic medical center: Implications for advancing research

The primary goal for any clinical trial after it receives a funding notification is to receive regulatory approval and initiate the trial for recruitment. Every trial must go through documentation and regulatory process before it can start recruiting participants and collecting data; this initial pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cernik, Colin, Shergina, Elena, Thompson, Jeffrey, Blackwell, Karen, Stephens, Kyle, Kimminau, Kim S., Wick, Jo, Mayo, Matthew S., Gajewski, Byron, He, Jianghua, Mudaranthakam, Dinesh Pal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100774
Descripción
Sumario:The primary goal for any clinical trial after it receives a funding notification is to receive regulatory approval and initiate the trial for recruitment. Every trial must go through documentation and regulatory process before it can start recruiting participants and collecting data; this initial process of review and approval is known as the study start-up process (SSU). We evaluated the average time taken for studies to receive approvals. Using data from clinical trials conducted at the University of Kansas Medical Center, various times to reach the start of the study were calculated based on the dates of individual study. The results of this analysis showed that chart review studies and investigator-initiated trials had a shorter time to activation than other types of studies. Additionally, single-center studies had a shorter activation time than multi-center studies. The analysis also demonstrated that the overall processing time consistently had been reduced over time.