Cargando…

Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome

Background: To compare two different methods of corneal culture in infectious keratitis: multiple sampling for direct inoculation and enrichment (standard method) and a single sample via transport medium for indirect inoculation (indirect inoculation method). Methods: Prospective inclusion of patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagerfors, Susanna, Karakoida, Chrysoula, Sundqvist, Martin, Ejdervik Lindblad, Birgitta, Söderquist, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8122416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091810
_version_ 1783692610065399808
author Sagerfors, Susanna
Karakoida, Chrysoula
Sundqvist, Martin
Ejdervik Lindblad, Birgitta
Söderquist, Bo
author_facet Sagerfors, Susanna
Karakoida, Chrysoula
Sundqvist, Martin
Ejdervik Lindblad, Birgitta
Söderquist, Bo
author_sort Sagerfors, Susanna
collection PubMed
description Background: To compare two different methods of corneal culture in infectious keratitis: multiple sampling for direct inoculation and enrichment (standard method) and a single sample via transport medium for indirect inoculation (indirect inoculation method). Methods: Prospective inclusion of patients fulfilling predefined criteria of infectious keratitis undergoing corneal culture according to both studied methods in a randomized order. Results: The standard method resulted in a significantly higher proportion of positive culture outcomes among the 94 included episodes of infectious keratitis (61%; 57/94) than the indirect inoculation method (44%; 41/94) (p = 0.002) and a significantly higher proportion of microorganisms than the indirect inoculation method, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28–0.49) for agreement between the methods. Subanalysis of culture results showed that direct inoculation on gonococcal agar only combined with the indirect inoculation method resulted in a similar rate of culture positive patients and proportion of detected microorganisms to the standard method. Conclusion: Indirect inoculation of one corneal sample cannot replace direct inoculation of multiple corneal samples without loss of information. A combination of directly and indirectly inoculated samples can reduce the number of corneal samples by four without statistically significant differences in culture outcome or in the proportion of detected microorganisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8122416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81224162021-05-16 Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome Sagerfors, Susanna Karakoida, Chrysoula Sundqvist, Martin Ejdervik Lindblad, Birgitta Söderquist, Bo J Clin Med Article Background: To compare two different methods of corneal culture in infectious keratitis: multiple sampling for direct inoculation and enrichment (standard method) and a single sample via transport medium for indirect inoculation (indirect inoculation method). Methods: Prospective inclusion of patients fulfilling predefined criteria of infectious keratitis undergoing corneal culture according to both studied methods in a randomized order. Results: The standard method resulted in a significantly higher proportion of positive culture outcomes among the 94 included episodes of infectious keratitis (61%; 57/94) than the indirect inoculation method (44%; 41/94) (p = 0.002) and a significantly higher proportion of microorganisms than the indirect inoculation method, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28–0.49) for agreement between the methods. Subanalysis of culture results showed that direct inoculation on gonococcal agar only combined with the indirect inoculation method resulted in a similar rate of culture positive patients and proportion of detected microorganisms to the standard method. Conclusion: Indirect inoculation of one corneal sample cannot replace direct inoculation of multiple corneal samples without loss of information. A combination of directly and indirectly inoculated samples can reduce the number of corneal samples by four without statistically significant differences in culture outcome or in the proportion of detected microorganisms. MDPI 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8122416/ /pubmed/33919274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091810 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sagerfors, Susanna
Karakoida, Chrysoula
Sundqvist, Martin
Ejdervik Lindblad, Birgitta
Söderquist, Bo
Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title_full Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title_fullStr Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title_short Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome
title_sort corneal culture in infectious keratitis: effect of the inoculation method and media on the corneal culture outcome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8122416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091810
work_keys_str_mv AT sagerforssusanna cornealcultureininfectiouskeratitiseffectoftheinoculationmethodandmediaonthecornealcultureoutcome
AT karakoidachrysoula cornealcultureininfectiouskeratitiseffectoftheinoculationmethodandmediaonthecornealcultureoutcome
AT sundqvistmartin cornealcultureininfectiouskeratitiseffectoftheinoculationmethodandmediaonthecornealcultureoutcome
AT ejderviklindbladbirgitta cornealcultureininfectiouskeratitiseffectoftheinoculationmethodandmediaonthecornealcultureoutcome
AT soderquistbo cornealcultureininfectiouskeratitiseffectoftheinoculationmethodandmediaonthecornealcultureoutcome