Cargando…
Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity
BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization is a type of instrumental variable (IV) analysis that uses inherited genetic variants as instruments to estimate causal effects attributable to genetic factors. This study aims to estimate the impact of obesity on annual inpatient healthcare costs in the UK using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8122556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00314-2 |
_version_ | 1783692646943817728 |
---|---|
author | Dick, Katherine Schneider, John E. Briggs, Andrew Lecomte, Pascal Regnier, Stephane A. Lean, Michael |
author_facet | Dick, Katherine Schneider, John E. Briggs, Andrew Lecomte, Pascal Regnier, Stephane A. Lean, Michael |
author_sort | Dick, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization is a type of instrumental variable (IV) analysis that uses inherited genetic variants as instruments to estimate causal effects attributable to genetic factors. This study aims to estimate the impact of obesity on annual inpatient healthcare costs in the UK using linked data from the UK Biobank and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). METHODS: UK Biobank data for 482,127 subjects was linked with HES inpatient admission records, and costs were assigned to episodes of care. A two-stage least squares (TSLS) IV model and a TSLS two-part cost model were compared to a naïve regression of inpatient healthcare costs on body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The naïve analysis of annual cost on continuous BMI predicted an annual cost of £21.61 [95% CI £20.33 – £22.89] greater cost per unit increase in BMI. The TSLS IV model predicted an annual cost of £14.36 [95% CI £0.31 – £28.42] greater cost per unit increase in BMI. Modelled with a binary obesity variable, the naïve analysis predicted that obese subjects incurred £205.53 [95% CI £191.45 – £219.60] greater costs than non-obese subjects. The TSLS model predicted a cost £201.58 [95% CI £4.32 – £398.84] greater for obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The IV models provide evidence for a causal relationship between obesity and higher inpatient healthcare costs. Compared to the naïve models, the binary IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of obesity, and the continuous IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of a single unit increase in BMI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8122556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81225562021-05-17 Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity Dick, Katherine Schneider, John E. Briggs, Andrew Lecomte, Pascal Regnier, Stephane A. Lean, Michael Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization is a type of instrumental variable (IV) analysis that uses inherited genetic variants as instruments to estimate causal effects attributable to genetic factors. This study aims to estimate the impact of obesity on annual inpatient healthcare costs in the UK using linked data from the UK Biobank and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). METHODS: UK Biobank data for 482,127 subjects was linked with HES inpatient admission records, and costs were assigned to episodes of care. A two-stage least squares (TSLS) IV model and a TSLS two-part cost model were compared to a naïve regression of inpatient healthcare costs on body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The naïve analysis of annual cost on continuous BMI predicted an annual cost of £21.61 [95% CI £20.33 – £22.89] greater cost per unit increase in BMI. The TSLS IV model predicted an annual cost of £14.36 [95% CI £0.31 – £28.42] greater cost per unit increase in BMI. Modelled with a binary obesity variable, the naïve analysis predicted that obese subjects incurred £205.53 [95% CI £191.45 – £219.60] greater costs than non-obese subjects. The TSLS model predicted a cost £201.58 [95% CI £4.32 – £398.84] greater for obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The IV models provide evidence for a causal relationship between obesity and higher inpatient healthcare costs. Compared to the naïve models, the binary IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of obesity, and the continuous IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of a single unit increase in BMI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8122556/ /pubmed/33990897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00314-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dick, Katherine Schneider, John E. Briggs, Andrew Lecomte, Pascal Regnier, Stephane A. Lean, Michael Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title | Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title_full | Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title_fullStr | Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title_short | Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
title_sort | mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8122556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00314-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickkatherine mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity AT schneiderjohne mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity AT briggsandrew mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity AT lecomtepascal mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity AT regnierstephanea mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity AT leanmichael mendelianrandomizationestimationofinpatienthospitalcostsattributabletoobesity |