Cargando…

Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram

We present a set of three fundamental methods for electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnostic interpretation adapted to process non-uniformly sampled signal. The growing volume of ECGs recorded daily all over the world (roughly estimated to be 600 TB) and the expectance of long persistence of these data (on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Augustyniak, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21092969
_version_ 1783692780509331456
author Augustyniak, Piotr
author_facet Augustyniak, Piotr
author_sort Augustyniak, Piotr
collection PubMed
description We present a set of three fundamental methods for electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnostic interpretation adapted to process non-uniformly sampled signal. The growing volume of ECGs recorded daily all over the world (roughly estimated to be 600 TB) and the expectance of long persistence of these data (on the order of 40 years) motivated us to challenge the feasibility of medical-grade diagnostics directly based on arbitrary non-uniform (i.e., storage-efficient) ECG representation. We used a refined time-independent QRS detection method based on a moving shape matching technique. We applied a graph data representation to quantify the similarity of asynchronously sampled heartbeats. Finally, we applied a correlation-based non-uniform to time-scale transform to get a multiresolution ECG representation on a regular dyadic grid and to find precise P, QRS and T wave delimitation points. The whole processing chain was implemented and tested with MIT-BIH Database (probably the most referenced cardiac database) and CSE Multilead Database (used for conformance testing of medical instruments) signals arbitrarily sampled accordingly to a perceptual model (set for variable sampling frequency of 100–500 Hz, compression ratio 3.1). The QRS detection shows an accuracy of 99.93% with false detection ratio of only 0.18%. The classification shows an accuracy of 99.27% for 14 most frequent MIT-BIH beat types and 99.37% according to AAMI beat labels. The wave delineation shows cumulative (i.e., sampling model and non-uniform processing) errors of: 9.7 ms for P wave duration, 3.4 ms for QRS, 6.7 ms for P-Q segment and 17.7 ms for Q-T segment, all the values being acceptable for medical-grade interpretive software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8123013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81230132021-05-16 Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram Augustyniak, Piotr Sensors (Basel) Article We present a set of three fundamental methods for electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnostic interpretation adapted to process non-uniformly sampled signal. The growing volume of ECGs recorded daily all over the world (roughly estimated to be 600 TB) and the expectance of long persistence of these data (on the order of 40 years) motivated us to challenge the feasibility of medical-grade diagnostics directly based on arbitrary non-uniform (i.e., storage-efficient) ECG representation. We used a refined time-independent QRS detection method based on a moving shape matching technique. We applied a graph data representation to quantify the similarity of asynchronously sampled heartbeats. Finally, we applied a correlation-based non-uniform to time-scale transform to get a multiresolution ECG representation on a regular dyadic grid and to find precise P, QRS and T wave delimitation points. The whole processing chain was implemented and tested with MIT-BIH Database (probably the most referenced cardiac database) and CSE Multilead Database (used for conformance testing of medical instruments) signals arbitrarily sampled accordingly to a perceptual model (set for variable sampling frequency of 100–500 Hz, compression ratio 3.1). The QRS detection shows an accuracy of 99.93% with false detection ratio of only 0.18%. The classification shows an accuracy of 99.27% for 14 most frequent MIT-BIH beat types and 99.37% according to AAMI beat labels. The wave delineation shows cumulative (i.e., sampling model and non-uniform processing) errors of: 9.7 ms for P wave duration, 3.4 ms for QRS, 6.7 ms for P-Q segment and 17.7 ms for Q-T segment, all the values being acceptable for medical-grade interpretive software. MDPI 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8123013/ /pubmed/33922870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21092969 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Augustyniak, Piotr
Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title_full Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title_fullStr Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title_short Diagnostic Interpretation of Non-Uniformly Sampled Electrocardiogram
title_sort diagnostic interpretation of non-uniformly sampled electrocardiogram
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21092969
work_keys_str_mv AT augustyniakpiotr diagnosticinterpretationofnonuniformlysampledelectrocardiogram