Cargando…

Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories

BACKGROUND: Female breast cancer was the most diagnosed cancer in 2020, with more than two million new cases worldwide. Access to scientifically correct information can assist patients in early detection or prevention of the disease. However, misinformation on social networking sites (SNSs) about br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biancovilli, Priscila, Makszin, Lilla, Csongor, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33992111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y
_version_ 1783692805215879168
author Biancovilli, Priscila
Makszin, Lilla
Csongor, Alexandra
author_facet Biancovilli, Priscila
Makszin, Lilla
Csongor, Alexandra
author_sort Biancovilli, Priscila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Female breast cancer was the most diagnosed cancer in 2020, with more than two million new cases worldwide. Access to scientifically correct information can assist patients in early detection or prevention of the disease. However, misinformation on social networking sites (SNSs) about breast cancer can be propagated rapidly, posing a threat to health communication efforts. The aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of the most shared news stories referencing the disease that circulated on SNSs, including the credibility of this content. METHODS: This is an exploratory quali-quantitative study. Data collection was conducted between June 2019 and June 2020. We performed statistical and content analysis of the stories that had at least 1,000 total shares. Each story was classified in accordance to the following aspects: credibility; type of rumour; source; content type; mentions prevention or early detection/screening exams. RESULTS: The abundance of news stories in our sample (n = 1,594) were not classified according to their credibility, as they do not address science, risk factors, prevention, treatment, or other aspects which can be assessed for scientific accuracy. However, content classified as “rumours” are 3.29 times more shared than those considered scientifically correct. Regarding content type, most stories are classified as ‘real-life story’ or ‘solidarity’ (67.69%). In our sample, 5.08% of the total comment on prevention and 19.7% reference early detection. CONCLUSION: We consider it can be a good strategy, in SNSs, to combine content of greater popularity, such as real-life stories, with subjects that can make a difference in a patient’s life, such as early detection, breast cancer symptoms and disease prevention strategies. Doctors, scientists and health journalists can expand the dialogue with the lay public regarding breast cancer, helping to counteract online misinformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8123102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81231022021-05-17 Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories Biancovilli, Priscila Makszin, Lilla Csongor, Alexandra BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Female breast cancer was the most diagnosed cancer in 2020, with more than two million new cases worldwide. Access to scientifically correct information can assist patients in early detection or prevention of the disease. However, misinformation on social networking sites (SNSs) about breast cancer can be propagated rapidly, posing a threat to health communication efforts. The aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of the most shared news stories referencing the disease that circulated on SNSs, including the credibility of this content. METHODS: This is an exploratory quali-quantitative study. Data collection was conducted between June 2019 and June 2020. We performed statistical and content analysis of the stories that had at least 1,000 total shares. Each story was classified in accordance to the following aspects: credibility; type of rumour; source; content type; mentions prevention or early detection/screening exams. RESULTS: The abundance of news stories in our sample (n = 1,594) were not classified according to their credibility, as they do not address science, risk factors, prevention, treatment, or other aspects which can be assessed for scientific accuracy. However, content classified as “rumours” are 3.29 times more shared than those considered scientifically correct. Regarding content type, most stories are classified as ‘real-life story’ or ‘solidarity’ (67.69%). In our sample, 5.08% of the total comment on prevention and 19.7% reference early detection. CONCLUSION: We consider it can be a good strategy, in SNSs, to combine content of greater popularity, such as real-life stories, with subjects that can make a difference in a patient’s life, such as early detection, breast cancer symptoms and disease prevention strategies. Doctors, scientists and health journalists can expand the dialogue with the lay public regarding breast cancer, helping to counteract online misinformation. BioMed Central 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8123102/ /pubmed/33992111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Biancovilli, Priscila
Makszin, Lilla
Csongor, Alexandra
Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title_full Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title_fullStr Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title_short Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
title_sort breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33992111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y
work_keys_str_mv AT biancovillipriscila breastcanceronsocialmediaaqualiquantitativestudyonthecredibilityandcontenttypeofthemostsharednewsstories
AT makszinlilla breastcanceronsocialmediaaqualiquantitativestudyonthecredibilityandcontenttypeofthemostsharednewsstories
AT csongoralexandra breastcanceronsocialmediaaqualiquantitativestudyonthecredibilityandcontenttypeofthemostsharednewsstories