Cargando…

Using WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functional Impairment in People with Depression: Should Employment Receive More Attention?

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent mental disorder which causes public health burden and personal disabilities. In people with mental illness, unemployment is an index character of functional impairment. Methods: Using the Taiwan Databank of Persons with Disability (TD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chiang, Yu-Chen, Liou, Tsan-Hon, Lee, Hsin-Chien, Escorpizo, Reuben
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2021
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094552

Ejemplares similares

Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan
por: Chao, Pin-Zhir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Is WHODAS 2.0 Useful for Colorectal Cancer Survivors?
por: Lee, Hyun Haeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: the WHODAS 2.0
por: Young, Carolyn A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Predictors of Employment Status for Persons with Bipolar Disorder
por: Lu, Shu-Jen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease
por: Kim, Ji-In, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a Population-Based Sample of Youth
por: Kimber, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease: measures of functioning in neuropsychiatric disease
por: Downing, Nancy R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

WHODAS 2.0-BO: normative data for the assessment of disability in older adults
por: Ferrer, Michele Lacerda Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

WHODAS 2.0 as a Measure of Severity of Illness: Results of a FLDA Analysis
por: Sedano-Capdevila, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
por: Norén, Paulina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring Disability and Its Predicting Factors in a Large Database in Taiwan Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
por: Chi, Wen-Chou, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Three Quality of Life Instruments in Lymphatic Filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ
por: Thomas, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
por: Yang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Functioning and Disability Analysis of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury by Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
por: Kuo, Chia-Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Post Total Knee Replacement Rehabilitation Program: Delphi-Based Consensus Study in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Measurement of patient reported disability using WHODAS 2.0 before and after surgical intervention in Madagascar
por: White, Michelle C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
por: Holmberg, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis
por: Bejer, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Does more education mean less disability in people with dementia? A large cross-sectional study in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?
por: Galli, Tiziana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Chen, Hung-Lun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of phonophoresis on patients with knee osteoarthritis
por: Yang, Fu-An, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
por: Wawrzyniak, Kelly M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effectiveness of mental simulation practices after total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Lee, Ting-Hsuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Delphi-Based Consensus to Determine Core Aspects of Post-Hip-Fracture Surgery Rehabilitation Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
por: Lin, Che-Li, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mirror therapy combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke lower extremity motor function recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Oh, Zhen-Han, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients
por: Higgins, Alisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36‐item tool
por: Guida, José P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Support for the higher-order factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 self-report version in a Dutch outpatient psychiatric setting
por: Williams, Guido L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Body weight-supported gait training for patients with spinal cord injury: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Yang, Fu-An, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

WHODAS measurement properties for women with dysmenorrhea
por: de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
por: Katajapuu, Niina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of Activity and Participation Norms among General Adult Populations in Taiwan
por: Yen, Chia-Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0
por: Yoon, Seo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5g8hpfpn0ki2adsdafrn7eadjc