Cargando…
Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018 |
_version_ | 1783693071381168128 |
---|---|
author | Jassim, Ghufran Jameel, Mariam Brennan, Edwina Yusuf, Manaf Hasan, Nebras Alwatani, Yusuf |
author_facet | Jassim, Ghufran Jameel, Mariam Brennan, Edwina Yusuf, Manaf Hasan, Nebras Alwatani, Yusuf |
author_sort | Jassim, Ghufran |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18 years who had undergone either isolation or quarantine. Eligible participants were identified from the COVID-19 contacts (quarantine) and cases (isolation) database of Bahrain. Validated questionnaires for self-reported depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies — depression [CES-D]), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale — revised [IES-R]), and perceived stigma (Stigma Scale [SS]) were administered. RESULTS: Mean CES-D, IES-R, and SS scores were 16.76±5.65, 13.50±14.67, and 25.29±7.99, respectively. In sum, 40% (205 of 502) of participants showed clinically significant depression, and <20% (98 of 502) had indications of some posttraumatic distress, with greater depression and distress in those isolated than those quarantined. Perceived stigma was reported by 53.4% (268 of 502) of participants, more prominent among those quarantined. Depression and posttraumatic stress scores were significantly higher in females, college students, those with a history of mental health conditions, knowing a COVID-19 fatality, and experiencing social conflict. Age was a significant variable correlated with all three scales, with younger participants indicating more distress, depression, and stigma. Duration of segregation was significantly correlated with CES-D, score showing more depressive symptoms as the duration of isolation increased. Significant predictors were age, sex, history of mental illness, and COVID-19 status. CONCLUSION: Isolated and quarantined individuals reported depression, perceived stigma, and to a lesser extent distress. Psychological interventions identifying and targeting people with different-severity psychological burdens are in urgent need. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8123965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81239652021-05-17 Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study Jassim, Ghufran Jameel, Mariam Brennan, Edwina Yusuf, Manaf Hasan, Nebras Alwatani, Yusuf Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18 years who had undergone either isolation or quarantine. Eligible participants were identified from the COVID-19 contacts (quarantine) and cases (isolation) database of Bahrain. Validated questionnaires for self-reported depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies — depression [CES-D]), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale — revised [IES-R]), and perceived stigma (Stigma Scale [SS]) were administered. RESULTS: Mean CES-D, IES-R, and SS scores were 16.76±5.65, 13.50±14.67, and 25.29±7.99, respectively. In sum, 40% (205 of 502) of participants showed clinically significant depression, and <20% (98 of 502) had indications of some posttraumatic distress, with greater depression and distress in those isolated than those quarantined. Perceived stigma was reported by 53.4% (268 of 502) of participants, more prominent among those quarantined. Depression and posttraumatic stress scores were significantly higher in females, college students, those with a history of mental health conditions, knowing a COVID-19 fatality, and experiencing social conflict. Age was a significant variable correlated with all three scales, with younger participants indicating more distress, depression, and stigma. Duration of segregation was significantly correlated with CES-D, score showing more depressive symptoms as the duration of isolation increased. Significant predictors were age, sex, history of mental illness, and COVID-19 status. CONCLUSION: Isolated and quarantined individuals reported depression, perceived stigma, and to a lesser extent distress. Psychological interventions identifying and targeting people with different-severity psychological burdens are in urgent need. Dove 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8123965/ /pubmed/34007180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018 Text en © 2021 Jassim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jassim, Ghufran Jameel, Mariam Brennan, Edwina Yusuf, Manaf Hasan, Nebras Alwatani, Yusuf Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | psychological impact of covid-19, isolation, and quarantine: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jassimghufran psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy AT jameelmariam psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy AT brennanedwina psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy AT yusufmanaf psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy AT hasannebras psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy AT alwataniyusuf psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy |