Cargando…

Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jassim, Ghufran, Jameel, Mariam, Brennan, Edwina, Yusuf, Manaf, Hasan, Nebras, Alwatani, Yusuf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018
_version_ 1783693071381168128
author Jassim, Ghufran
Jameel, Mariam
Brennan, Edwina
Yusuf, Manaf
Hasan, Nebras
Alwatani, Yusuf
author_facet Jassim, Ghufran
Jameel, Mariam
Brennan, Edwina
Yusuf, Manaf
Hasan, Nebras
Alwatani, Yusuf
author_sort Jassim, Ghufran
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18 years who had undergone either isolation or quarantine. Eligible participants were identified from the COVID-19 contacts (quarantine) and cases (isolation) database of Bahrain. Validated questionnaires for self-reported depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies — depression [CES-D]), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale — revised [IES-R]), and perceived stigma (Stigma Scale [SS]) were administered. RESULTS: Mean CES-D, IES-R, and SS scores were 16.76±5.65, 13.50±14.67, and 25.29±7.99, respectively. In sum, 40% (205 of 502) of participants showed clinically significant depression, and <20% (98 of 502) had indications of some posttraumatic distress, with greater depression and distress in those isolated than those quarantined. Perceived stigma was reported by 53.4% (268 of 502) of participants, more prominent among those quarantined. Depression and posttraumatic stress scores were significantly higher in females, college students, those with a history of mental health conditions, knowing a COVID-19 fatality, and experiencing social conflict. Age was a significant variable correlated with all three scales, with younger participants indicating more distress, depression, and stigma. Duration of segregation was significantly correlated with CES-D, score showing more depressive symptoms as the duration of isolation increased. Significant predictors were age, sex, history of mental illness, and COVID-19 status. CONCLUSION: Isolated and quarantined individuals reported depression, perceived stigma, and to a lesser extent distress. Psychological interventions identifying and targeting people with different-severity psychological burdens are in urgent need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8123965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81239652021-05-17 Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study Jassim, Ghufran Jameel, Mariam Brennan, Edwina Yusuf, Manaf Hasan, Nebras Alwatani, Yusuf Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in mandatory isolation and quarantine. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants were Bahrainis aged >18 years who had undergone either isolation or quarantine. Eligible participants were identified from the COVID-19 contacts (quarantine) and cases (isolation) database of Bahrain. Validated questionnaires for self-reported depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies — depression [CES-D]), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale — revised [IES-R]), and perceived stigma (Stigma Scale [SS]) were administered. RESULTS: Mean CES-D, IES-R, and SS scores were 16.76±5.65, 13.50±14.67, and 25.29±7.99, respectively. In sum, 40% (205 of 502) of participants showed clinically significant depression, and <20% (98 of 502) had indications of some posttraumatic distress, with greater depression and distress in those isolated than those quarantined. Perceived stigma was reported by 53.4% (268 of 502) of participants, more prominent among those quarantined. Depression and posttraumatic stress scores were significantly higher in females, college students, those with a history of mental health conditions, knowing a COVID-19 fatality, and experiencing social conflict. Age was a significant variable correlated with all three scales, with younger participants indicating more distress, depression, and stigma. Duration of segregation was significantly correlated with CES-D, score showing more depressive symptoms as the duration of isolation increased. Significant predictors were age, sex, history of mental illness, and COVID-19 status. CONCLUSION: Isolated and quarantined individuals reported depression, perceived stigma, and to a lesser extent distress. Psychological interventions identifying and targeting people with different-severity psychological burdens are in urgent need. Dove 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8123965/ /pubmed/34007180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018 Text en © 2021 Jassim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jassim, Ghufran
Jameel, Mariam
Brennan, Edwina
Yusuf, Manaf
Hasan, Nebras
Alwatani, Yusuf
Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort psychological impact of covid-19, isolation, and quarantine: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S311018
work_keys_str_mv AT jassimghufran psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy
AT jameelmariam psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy
AT brennanedwina psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy
AT yusufmanaf psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy
AT hasannebras psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy
AT alwataniyusuf psychologicalimpactofcovid19isolationandquarantineacrosssectionalstudy