Cargando…
Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study
METHODS: The current study includes 80 extracted premolars of human from the patient visiting for orthodontic treatment of Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Karnataka, India. The brackets were debonded using four different methods. The enamel surface damage after the procedure was assessed with th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5561040 |
_version_ | 1783693083218542592 |
---|---|
author | Bora, Neelutpal Mahanta, Putul Kalita, Deepjyoti Deka, Sangeeta Konwar, Ranjumoni Phukan, Chiranjita |
author_facet | Bora, Neelutpal Mahanta, Putul Kalita, Deepjyoti Deka, Sangeeta Konwar, Ranjumoni Phukan, Chiranjita |
author_sort | Bora, Neelutpal |
collection | PubMed |
description | METHODS: The current study includes 80 extracted premolars of human from the patient visiting for orthodontic treatment of Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Karnataka, India. The brackets were debonded using four different methods. The enamel surface damage after the procedure was assessed with the Enamel Surface Index (ESI); similarly, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) score was used to determine the adhesive residual deposit. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize better microporosities and micromechanical retention of adhesive remnants on the enamel surface. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Depending upon the normality test result, the one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the mean ESI and mean ARI differences among different debonding methods along with the appropriate post hoc tests. The necessary ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the institute. RESULTS: The ultrasonic scaler (US) technique led to more significant enamel surface damage, with 13 (65%) samples in the ESI scores III and IV against the satisfactory surface in 2 (10%) samples with the ligature cutter (LC) technique (ESI-I) reflecting LC as a better technique. The ESI scores (III and IV) for debonding plier (DP) and thermal method (TM) reflected a higher value in 12 (60%) and 10 (50%) samples and caused more damage to the enamel surface as compared to the LC technique. The ARI score was highest (ARI-1 = 40%) with the LC technique, followed by the US (ARI-1 = 20%), TM (ARI-1 = 15%), and DP (ARI-1 = 5%) methods. We have observed a significant association (p value <0.05) of the ARI score among four different debonding ways in terms of each tooth's residual adhesive after the bracket removal. CONCLUSION: The result establishes the LC technique as a more acceptable one as it causes minimal harm to the debonded surface. The adhesive left on the debonded area is also minimum as compared to the other three methods tested. Therefore, it can be suggested as an ideal method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8124004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81240042021-05-24 Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study Bora, Neelutpal Mahanta, Putul Kalita, Deepjyoti Deka, Sangeeta Konwar, Ranjumoni Phukan, Chiranjita ScientificWorldJournal Research Article METHODS: The current study includes 80 extracted premolars of human from the patient visiting for orthodontic treatment of Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Karnataka, India. The brackets were debonded using four different methods. The enamel surface damage after the procedure was assessed with the Enamel Surface Index (ESI); similarly, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) score was used to determine the adhesive residual deposit. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize better microporosities and micromechanical retention of adhesive remnants on the enamel surface. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Depending upon the normality test result, the one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the mean ESI and mean ARI differences among different debonding methods along with the appropriate post hoc tests. The necessary ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the institute. RESULTS: The ultrasonic scaler (US) technique led to more significant enamel surface damage, with 13 (65%) samples in the ESI scores III and IV against the satisfactory surface in 2 (10%) samples with the ligature cutter (LC) technique (ESI-I) reflecting LC as a better technique. The ESI scores (III and IV) for debonding plier (DP) and thermal method (TM) reflected a higher value in 12 (60%) and 10 (50%) samples and caused more damage to the enamel surface as compared to the LC technique. The ARI score was highest (ARI-1 = 40%) with the LC technique, followed by the US (ARI-1 = 20%), TM (ARI-1 = 15%), and DP (ARI-1 = 5%) methods. We have observed a significant association (p value <0.05) of the ARI score among four different debonding ways in terms of each tooth's residual adhesive after the bracket removal. CONCLUSION: The result establishes the LC technique as a more acceptable one as it causes minimal harm to the debonded surface. The adhesive left on the debonded area is also minimum as compared to the other three methods tested. Therefore, it can be suggested as an ideal method. Hindawi 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8124004/ /pubmed/34035672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5561040 Text en Copyright © 2021 Neelutpal Bora et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bora, Neelutpal Mahanta, Putul Kalita, Deepjyoti Deka, Sangeeta Konwar, Ranjumoni Phukan, Chiranjita Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title | Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title_full | Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title_fullStr | Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title_short | Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study |
title_sort | enamel surface damage following debonding of ceramic brackets: a hospital-based study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5561040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boraneelutpal enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy AT mahantaputul enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy AT kalitadeepjyoti enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy AT dekasangeeta enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy AT konwarranjumoni enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy AT phukanchiranjita enamelsurfacedamagefollowingdebondingofceramicbracketsahospitalbasedstudy |