Cargando…
‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA
Like the Operations Research models used to justify the ethnic cleansing of minority voting blocs in 1970’s New York City, AI ‘risk assessment’ systems for individuals will be used to reinforce longstanding power relations between ethnic groups within the USA. From the perspective of African–America...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00061-4 |
_version_ | 1783693104119808000 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, R. |
author_facet | Wallace, R. |
author_sort | Wallace, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Like the Operations Research models used to justify the ethnic cleansing of minority voting blocs in 1970’s New York City, AI ‘risk assessment’ systems for individuals will be used to reinforce longstanding power relations between ethnic groups within the USA. From the perspective of African–Americans and their abolitionist allies, the central problem with AI risk assessment does not involve ‘corrective’ stabilization of an inadvertently unstable system. On the contrary, that system’s de-facto—if sometimes camouflaged—purpose is enforcing the stability of historic patterns of racial oppression, constitutional formalities notwithstanding. AI, like ‘OR’ before it, becomes, then, simply another tactic in a persistent strategy aimed at reinforcing a stable cultural trajectory with roots deep in human slavery. To the archetypic question ‘what is to be done?’ is the archetypic answer: build countervailing power. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8124096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81240962021-05-17 ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA Wallace, R. AI Ethics Opinion Paper Like the Operations Research models used to justify the ethnic cleansing of minority voting blocs in 1970’s New York City, AI ‘risk assessment’ systems for individuals will be used to reinforce longstanding power relations between ethnic groups within the USA. From the perspective of African–Americans and their abolitionist allies, the central problem with AI risk assessment does not involve ‘corrective’ stabilization of an inadvertently unstable system. On the contrary, that system’s de-facto—if sometimes camouflaged—purpose is enforcing the stability of historic patterns of racial oppression, constitutional formalities notwithstanding. AI, like ‘OR’ before it, becomes, then, simply another tactic in a persistent strategy aimed at reinforcing a stable cultural trajectory with roots deep in human slavery. To the archetypic question ‘what is to be done?’ is the archetypic answer: build countervailing power. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8124096/ /pubmed/34790949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00061-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Paper Wallace, R. ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title | ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title_full | ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title_fullStr | ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title_short | ‘The names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the USA |
title_sort | ‘the names have changed, but the game’s the same’: artificial intelligence and racial policy in the usa |
topic | Opinion Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00061-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallacer thenameshavechangedbutthegamesthesameartificialintelligenceandracialpolicyintheusa |