Cargando…

Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders

Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varghese, Julian, van Alen, Catharina Marie, Fujarski, Michael, Schlake, Georg Stefan, Sucker, Julitta, Warnecke, Tobias, Thomas, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093139
_version_ 1783693122112323584
author Varghese, Julian
van Alen, Catharina Marie
Fujarski, Michael
Schlake, Georg Stefan
Sucker, Julitta
Warnecke, Tobias
Thomas, Christine
author_facet Varghese, Julian
van Alen, Catharina Marie
Fujarski, Michael
Schlake, Georg Stefan
Sucker, Julitta
Warnecke, Tobias
Thomas, Christine
author_sort Varghese, Julian
collection PubMed
description Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8124167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81241672021-05-17 Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders Varghese, Julian van Alen, Catharina Marie Fujarski, Michael Schlake, Georg Stefan Sucker, Julitta Warnecke, Tobias Thomas, Christine Sensors (Basel) Article Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders. MDPI 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8124167/ /pubmed/33946494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093139 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Varghese, Julian
van Alen, Catharina Marie
Fujarski, Michael
Schlake, Georg Stefan
Sucker, Julitta
Warnecke, Tobias
Thomas, Christine
Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_full Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_fullStr Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_short Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders
title_sort sensor validation and diagnostic potential of smartwatches in movement disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093139
work_keys_str_mv AT varghesejulian sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT vanalencatharinamarie sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT fujarskimichael sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT schlakegeorgstefan sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT suckerjulitta sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT warnecketobias sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders
AT thomaschristine sensorvalidationanddiagnosticpotentialofsmartwatchesinmovementdisorders