Cargando…

Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose

E-noses are innovative tools used for exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis, which have shown their potential in several diseases. Before obtaining a full validation of these instruments in clinical settings, a number of methodological issues still have to be established. We aimed to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dragonieri, Silvano, Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola, Carratù, Pierluigi, Ranieri, Teresa, Buonamico, Enrico, Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34064506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092695
_version_ 1783693127269220352
author Dragonieri, Silvano
Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola
Carratù, Pierluigi
Ranieri, Teresa
Buonamico, Enrico
Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana
author_facet Dragonieri, Silvano
Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola
Carratù, Pierluigi
Ranieri, Teresa
Buonamico, Enrico
Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana
author_sort Dragonieri, Silvano
collection PubMed
description E-noses are innovative tools used for exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis, which have shown their potential in several diseases. Before obtaining a full validation of these instruments in clinical settings, a number of methodological issues still have to be established. We aimed to assess whether variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in with VOC-filtered air before exhaled air collection reflect changes in the exhaled VOC profile when analyzed by an e-nose (Cyranose 320). We enrolled 20 normal subjects and randomly collected their exhaled breath at three different breathing rhythms during wash-in: (a) normal rhythm (respiratory rate (RR) between 12 and 18/min), (b) fast rhythm (RR > 25/min) and (c) slow rhythm (RR < 10/min). Exhaled breath was collected by a previously validated method (Dragonieri et al., J. Bras. Pneumol. 2016) and analyzed by the e-nose. Using principal component analysis (PCA), no significant variations in the exhaled VOC profile were shown among the three breathing rhythms. Subsequent linear discriminant analysis (LDA) confirmed the above findings, with a cross-validated accuracy of 45% (p = ns). We concluded that the exhaled VOC profile, analyzed by an e-nose, is not influenced by variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8124182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81241822021-05-17 Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose Dragonieri, Silvano Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola Carratù, Pierluigi Ranieri, Teresa Buonamico, Enrico Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana Molecules Communication E-noses are innovative tools used for exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis, which have shown their potential in several diseases. Before obtaining a full validation of these instruments in clinical settings, a number of methodological issues still have to be established. We aimed to assess whether variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in with VOC-filtered air before exhaled air collection reflect changes in the exhaled VOC profile when analyzed by an e-nose (Cyranose 320). We enrolled 20 normal subjects and randomly collected their exhaled breath at three different breathing rhythms during wash-in: (a) normal rhythm (respiratory rate (RR) between 12 and 18/min), (b) fast rhythm (RR > 25/min) and (c) slow rhythm (RR < 10/min). Exhaled breath was collected by a previously validated method (Dragonieri et al., J. Bras. Pneumol. 2016) and analyzed by the e-nose. Using principal component analysis (PCA), no significant variations in the exhaled VOC profile were shown among the three breathing rhythms. Subsequent linear discriminant analysis (LDA) confirmed the above findings, with a cross-validated accuracy of 45% (p = ns). We concluded that the exhaled VOC profile, analyzed by an e-nose, is not influenced by variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in. MDPI 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8124182/ /pubmed/34064506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092695 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Dragonieri, Silvano
Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola
Carratù, Pierluigi
Ranieri, Teresa
Buonamico, Enrico
Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana
Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title_full Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title_fullStr Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title_full_unstemmed Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title_short Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
title_sort breathing rhythm variations during wash-in do not influence exhaled volatile organic compound profile analyzed by an electronic nose
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34064506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092695
work_keys_str_mv AT dragonierisilvano breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose
AT quarantavitalianonicola breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose
AT carratupierluigi breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose
AT ranieriteresa breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose
AT buonamicoenrico breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose
AT carpagnanogiovannaelisiana breathingrhythmvariationsduringwashindonotinfluenceexhaledvolatileorganiccompoundprofileanalyzedbyanelectronicnose