Cargando…
Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study
Objective: A digital workflow opens up new possibilities for the indirect bonding (IDB) of brackets. We tested if the printing orientation for bracket transfer models on the build platform of a 3D printer influences the accuracy of the following IDB method. We also evaluated the clinical acceptabili...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092002 |
_version_ | 1783693156628299776 |
---|---|
author | Süpple, Julia von Glasenapp, Julius Hofmann, Eva Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg Koch, Petra Julia |
author_facet | Süpple, Julia von Glasenapp, Julius Hofmann, Eva Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg Koch, Petra Julia |
author_sort | Süpple, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: A digital workflow opens up new possibilities for the indirect bonding (IDB) of brackets. We tested if the printing orientation for bracket transfer models on the build platform of a 3D printer influences the accuracy of the following IDB method. We also evaluated the clinical acceptability of the IDB method combining digitally planned and printed transfer models with the conventional fabrication of pressure-molded transfer trays. Materials and Methods: In total, 27 digitally planned bracket transfer models were printed with both 15° and 75° angulation from horizontal plane on the build platform of a digital light processing (DLP) printer. Brackets were temporarily bonded to the transfer models and pressure-molded trays were produced on them. IDB was then performed using the trays on the respective plaster models. The plaster models were scanned with an optical scanner. Digitally planned pre-bonding and scanned post-bonding bracket positions were superimposed with a software and resulted in three linear and three angular deviations per bracket. Results: No statistically significant differences of the transfer accuracy of printed transfer models angulated 15° or 75° on the 3D printer build platform were found. About 97% of the linear and 82% of the angular deviations were within the clinically acceptable range of ±0.2 mm and ±1°, respectively. The highest inaccuracies in the linear dimension occurred in the vertical towards the gingival direction and in the angular dimension in palatal crown torque. Conclusion: For the IDB method used, the printing orientation on the build platform did not have a significant impact on the transfer accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8124276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81242762021-05-17 Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study Süpple, Julia von Glasenapp, Julius Hofmann, Eva Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg Koch, Petra Julia J Clin Med Article Objective: A digital workflow opens up new possibilities for the indirect bonding (IDB) of brackets. We tested if the printing orientation for bracket transfer models on the build platform of a 3D printer influences the accuracy of the following IDB method. We also evaluated the clinical acceptability of the IDB method combining digitally planned and printed transfer models with the conventional fabrication of pressure-molded transfer trays. Materials and Methods: In total, 27 digitally planned bracket transfer models were printed with both 15° and 75° angulation from horizontal plane on the build platform of a digital light processing (DLP) printer. Brackets were temporarily bonded to the transfer models and pressure-molded trays were produced on them. IDB was then performed using the trays on the respective plaster models. The plaster models were scanned with an optical scanner. Digitally planned pre-bonding and scanned post-bonding bracket positions were superimposed with a software and resulted in three linear and three angular deviations per bracket. Results: No statistically significant differences of the transfer accuracy of printed transfer models angulated 15° or 75° on the 3D printer build platform were found. About 97% of the linear and 82% of the angular deviations were within the clinically acceptable range of ±0.2 mm and ±1°, respectively. The highest inaccuracies in the linear dimension occurred in the vertical towards the gingival direction and in the angular dimension in palatal crown torque. Conclusion: For the IDB method used, the printing orientation on the build platform did not have a significant impact on the transfer accuracy. MDPI 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8124276/ /pubmed/34066993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092002 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Süpple, Julia von Glasenapp, Julius Hofmann, Eva Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg Koch, Petra Julia Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title | Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations—An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | accurate bracket placement with an indirect bonding method using digitally designed transfer models printed in different orientations—an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT supplejulia accuratebracketplacementwithanindirectbondingmethodusingdigitallydesignedtransfermodelsprintedindifferentorientationsaninvitrostudy AT vonglasenappjulius accuratebracketplacementwithanindirectbondingmethodusingdigitallydesignedtransfermodelsprintedindifferentorientationsaninvitrostudy AT hofmanneva accuratebracketplacementwithanindirectbondingmethodusingdigitallydesignedtransfermodelsprintedindifferentorientationsaninvitrostudy AT jostbrinkmannpaulgeorg accuratebracketplacementwithanindirectbondingmethodusingdigitallydesignedtransfermodelsprintedindifferentorientationsaninvitrostudy AT kochpetrajulia accuratebracketplacementwithanindirectbondingmethodusingdigitallydesignedtransfermodelsprintedindifferentorientationsaninvitrostudy |