Cargando…

Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach

In the present study, chromatic coordinates, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity assessed by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS) and lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity (LPIC) essays and their relative IC50 were investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hssaini, Lahcen, Hernandez, Francisca, Viuda-Martos, Manuel, Charafi, Jamal, Razouk, Rachid, Houmanat, Karim, Ouaabou, Rachida, Ennahli, Said, Elothmani, Driss, Hmid, Ilham, Fauconnier, Marie Laure, Hanine, Hafida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092574
_version_ 1783693243908620288
author Hssaini, Lahcen
Hernandez, Francisca
Viuda-Martos, Manuel
Charafi, Jamal
Razouk, Rachid
Houmanat, Karim
Ouaabou, Rachida
Ennahli, Said
Elothmani, Driss
Hmid, Ilham
Fauconnier, Marie Laure
Hanine, Hafida
author_facet Hssaini, Lahcen
Hernandez, Francisca
Viuda-Martos, Manuel
Charafi, Jamal
Razouk, Rachid
Houmanat, Karim
Ouaabou, Rachida
Ennahli, Said
Elothmani, Driss
Hmid, Ilham
Fauconnier, Marie Laure
Hanine, Hafida
author_sort Hssaini, Lahcen
collection PubMed
description In the present study, chromatic coordinates, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity assessed by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS) and lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity (LPIC) essays and their relative IC50 were investigated in 25 fig cultivars growing in Morocco. The aims of this study were to determine (i) the variation in these compounds among light and dark-colored cultivars, (ii) their partitioning between fruit peel and pulp and (iii) to display network connections among these variables. Twelve phenolic compounds (PCs) were isolated in peel extract versus eight in pulp samples. Anthocyanins, mainly cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, were the predominant compounds in peels, where the mean concentrations were 75.90 ± 18.76 and 77.97 ± 18.95 µg/g dw, respectively. On the other hand, (−)-epicatechin and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside were the major compounds in the pulp extracts, where the mean values were 5.23 ± 4.03 and 9.01 ± 5.67 µg/g dw, respectively. A two-dimensional hierarchically clustered heatmap was applied to the dataset to explore correlations in the dataset and similarities between cultivars, without dimensionality reduction. Results showed that anthocyanins, particularly pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, were the main contributors to the peels’ free radical scavenging capacity. This capacity was particularly higher in the peel of dark-colored figs compared to the fruit pulp. The local cultivar “INRA 1301” showed the most promising phenolic profile due to its very high levels of almost all detected PCs, especially (−)-epicatechin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidine-3,5-diglucoside, cyanidine-3-O-rutinoside and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside (54.66, 141.08, 35.48, 494.08, 478.66, 12.56 µg/g dw, respectively). Having the darkest figs in the collection (L* = 25.72, c* = 22.09 and h° = 20.99), this cultivar has also combined promising IC50 values, which were of 19.85, 40.58 and 124.78 µg/mL for DPPH, ABTS and LPIC essays, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8124568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81245682021-05-17 Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach Hssaini, Lahcen Hernandez, Francisca Viuda-Martos, Manuel Charafi, Jamal Razouk, Rachid Houmanat, Karim Ouaabou, Rachida Ennahli, Said Elothmani, Driss Hmid, Ilham Fauconnier, Marie Laure Hanine, Hafida Molecules Article In the present study, chromatic coordinates, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity assessed by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS) and lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity (LPIC) essays and their relative IC50 were investigated in 25 fig cultivars growing in Morocco. The aims of this study were to determine (i) the variation in these compounds among light and dark-colored cultivars, (ii) their partitioning between fruit peel and pulp and (iii) to display network connections among these variables. Twelve phenolic compounds (PCs) were isolated in peel extract versus eight in pulp samples. Anthocyanins, mainly cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, were the predominant compounds in peels, where the mean concentrations were 75.90 ± 18.76 and 77.97 ± 18.95 µg/g dw, respectively. On the other hand, (−)-epicatechin and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside were the major compounds in the pulp extracts, where the mean values were 5.23 ± 4.03 and 9.01 ± 5.67 µg/g dw, respectively. A two-dimensional hierarchically clustered heatmap was applied to the dataset to explore correlations in the dataset and similarities between cultivars, without dimensionality reduction. Results showed that anthocyanins, particularly pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside and cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, were the main contributors to the peels’ free radical scavenging capacity. This capacity was particularly higher in the peel of dark-colored figs compared to the fruit pulp. The local cultivar “INRA 1301” showed the most promising phenolic profile due to its very high levels of almost all detected PCs, especially (−)-epicatechin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidine-3,5-diglucoside, cyanidine-3-O-rutinoside and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside (54.66, 141.08, 35.48, 494.08, 478.66, 12.56 µg/g dw, respectively). Having the darkest figs in the collection (L* = 25.72, c* = 22.09 and h° = 20.99), this cultivar has also combined promising IC50 values, which were of 19.85, 40.58 and 124.78 µg/mL for DPPH, ABTS and LPIC essays, respectively. MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8124568/ /pubmed/33925094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092574 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Hssaini, Lahcen
Hernandez, Francisca
Viuda-Martos, Manuel
Charafi, Jamal
Razouk, Rachid
Houmanat, Karim
Ouaabou, Rachida
Ennahli, Said
Elothmani, Driss
Hmid, Ilham
Fauconnier, Marie Laure
Hanine, Hafida
Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title_full Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title_fullStr Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title_full_unstemmed Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title_short Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach
title_sort survey of phenolic acids, flavonoids and in vitro antioxidant potency between fig peels and pulps: chemical and chemometric approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092574
work_keys_str_mv AT hssainilahcen surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT hernandezfrancisca surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT viudamartosmanuel surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT charafijamal surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT razoukrachid surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT houmanatkarim surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT ouaabourachida surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT ennahlisaid surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT elothmanidriss surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT hmidilham surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT fauconniermarielaure surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach
AT haninehafida surveyofphenolicacidsflavonoidsandinvitroantioxidantpotencybetweenfigpeelsandpulpschemicalandchemometricapproach