Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions
(1) Objective: Paramedics as a profession are a pillar of the State Medical Rescue system. The basic difference between a specialist and a basic team is the composition of members. The aim of the study was to benchmark the effectiveness of performing advanced resuscitation procedures undertaken by t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094834 |
_version_ | 1783693276863266816 |
---|---|
author | Krzyżanowski, Kamil Ślęzak, Daniel Dąbrowski, Sebastian Żuratyński, Przemysław Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Buca, Paulina Jastrzębski, Paweł Robakowska, Marlena |
author_facet | Krzyżanowski, Kamil Ślęzak, Daniel Dąbrowski, Sebastian Żuratyński, Przemysław Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Buca, Paulina Jastrzębski, Paweł Robakowska, Marlena |
author_sort | Krzyżanowski, Kamil |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Objective: Paramedics as a profession are a pillar of the State Medical Rescue system. The basic difference between a specialist and a basic team is the composition of members. The aim of the study was to benchmark the effectiveness of performing advanced resuscitation procedures undertaken by two- and three-person basic emergency medical teams in adults under simulated conditions. (2) Design: The research was observational. 200 two- and three-people basic emergency medical teams were analyzed during advanced resuscitation procedures, ALS (Advanced Life Support) in adults under simulated conditions. (3) Method: The study was carried out among professionally active and certified paramedics. It lasted over two years. The study took place under simulated conditions using prepared scenarios. (4) Results: In total, 463 people took part in the study. The analysis of the survey results indicates that the efficiency of three-person teams is superior to the activities performed by two-person teams. Three-person teams were quicker to perform rescue actions than two-person teams. The two-person teams were much quicker to assess the condition of victims than the three-person teams. The three-person teams were more likely to check an open airway. The three-person teams were more efficient in assessing the heart rhythm and current condition of victims. It was demonstrated that three-person teams were more effective during electrotherapy. The analysis demonstrated that three-person teams were significantly faster and more efficient in chest compressions. Three-person teams were less likely to use emergency airway techniques than two-person teams. The results indicate that three-person teams administered the first dose of adrenaline significantly faster than two-person teams. For the “call for help”, the three-person teams were found to be more effective. (5) Conclusion: Paramedics in three-person teams work more effectively, make a proper assessment of heart rhythm and monitor when taking advanced actions. The quality of ventilation and BLS in both groups studied is insufficient. Numerous errors have been observed in two-person teams during pharmacotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8124675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81246752021-05-17 Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions Krzyżanowski, Kamil Ślęzak, Daniel Dąbrowski, Sebastian Żuratyński, Przemysław Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Buca, Paulina Jastrzębski, Paweł Robakowska, Marlena Int J Environ Res Public Health Article (1) Objective: Paramedics as a profession are a pillar of the State Medical Rescue system. The basic difference between a specialist and a basic team is the composition of members. The aim of the study was to benchmark the effectiveness of performing advanced resuscitation procedures undertaken by two- and three-person basic emergency medical teams in adults under simulated conditions. (2) Design: The research was observational. 200 two- and three-people basic emergency medical teams were analyzed during advanced resuscitation procedures, ALS (Advanced Life Support) in adults under simulated conditions. (3) Method: The study was carried out among professionally active and certified paramedics. It lasted over two years. The study took place under simulated conditions using prepared scenarios. (4) Results: In total, 463 people took part in the study. The analysis of the survey results indicates that the efficiency of three-person teams is superior to the activities performed by two-person teams. Three-person teams were quicker to perform rescue actions than two-person teams. The two-person teams were much quicker to assess the condition of victims than the three-person teams. The three-person teams were more likely to check an open airway. The three-person teams were more efficient in assessing the heart rhythm and current condition of victims. It was demonstrated that three-person teams were more effective during electrotherapy. The analysis demonstrated that three-person teams were significantly faster and more efficient in chest compressions. Three-person teams were less likely to use emergency airway techniques than two-person teams. The results indicate that three-person teams administered the first dose of adrenaline significantly faster than two-person teams. For the “call for help”, the three-person teams were found to be more effective. (5) Conclusion: Paramedics in three-person teams work more effectively, make a proper assessment of heart rhythm and monitor when taking advanced actions. The quality of ventilation and BLS in both groups studied is insufficient. Numerous errors have been observed in two-person teams during pharmacotherapy. MDPI 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8124675/ /pubmed/33946551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094834 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Krzyżanowski, Kamil Ślęzak, Daniel Dąbrowski, Sebastian Żuratyński, Przemysław Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Buca, Paulina Jastrzębski, Paweł Robakowska, Marlena Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title | Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the effectiveness of performing advanced resuscitation procedures undertaken by two- and three- person basic medical rescue teams in adults under simulated conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krzyzanowskikamil comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT slezakdaniel comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT dabrowskisebastian comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT zuratynskiprzemysław comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT bucapaulina comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT jastrzebskipaweł comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions AT robakowskamarlena comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofperformingadvancedresuscitationproceduresundertakenbytwoandthreepersonbasicmedicalrescueteamsinadultsundersimulatedconditions |