Cargando…

Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, breast conserving therapy has equivalent local control to mastectomy alone. However, it is not clear whether this finding is equally applied to young women because of the lack of large scale prospective randomized studies. In this study, we compared the local control between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Dang Van, Kim, Sang-Won, Oh, Young-Taek, Noh, O Kyu, Jung, Yongsik, Chun, Mison, Yoon, Dae Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092150
_version_ 1783693307390459904
author Nguyen, Dang Van
Kim, Sang-Won
Oh, Young-Taek
Noh, O Kyu
Jung, Yongsik
Chun, Mison
Yoon, Dae Sung
author_facet Nguyen, Dang Van
Kim, Sang-Won
Oh, Young-Taek
Noh, O Kyu
Jung, Yongsik
Chun, Mison
Yoon, Dae Sung
author_sort Nguyen, Dang Van
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, breast conserving therapy has equivalent local control to mastectomy alone. However, it is not clear whether this finding is equally applied to young women because of the lack of large scale prospective randomized studies. In this study, we compared the local control between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy alone for young women with breast cancer. We found that young women who underwent breast conserving therapy had an approximately 2.5-fold increased risk of local recurrence compared with those receiving mastectomy alone. The prognosis of young women who had local recurrence after breast conserving therapy were poor despite the aggressive salvage treatments. Therefore, the development of more effective novel systemic treatments is required to improve treatment outcomes in young women with breast cancer receiving breast conserving therapy. ABSTRACT: We compared the cumulative incidence of local recurrence in young patients (≤40 years) with breast cancer between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy alone. Among 428 women with early-stage breast cancer who were treated between 2001 and 2012, 311 underwent BCT and 117 underwent mastectomy alone. Adjuvant systemic treatments were administered to 409 patients (95.6%). We compared the cumulative incidence of LR and survival rates between two groups. During a median follow-up period of 91 months, the 10-year cumulative incidence of LR was 9.3% (median interval of 36.5 months from surgery). Patients treated with BCT tended to have a higher risk for local recurrence (11.1% for BCT vs. 4.1% for mastectomy alone, p = 0.078). All patients with isolated LR after BCT (n = 23) underwent salvage mastectomy followed by systemic treatments. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival of patients with isolated LR after BCT were 44.2% and 82.2%, respectively. The BCT group exhibited an approximately 2.5-fold higher risk of LR than mastectomy alone group. Patients with isolated LR after BCT showed poor prognosis despite undergoing aggressive salvage treatments. The development of novel treatments should be investigated to reduce LR for improving prognosis and preserving cosmetic outcomes in young women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8124780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81247802021-05-17 Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone Nguyen, Dang Van Kim, Sang-Won Oh, Young-Taek Noh, O Kyu Jung, Yongsik Chun, Mison Yoon, Dae Sung Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, breast conserving therapy has equivalent local control to mastectomy alone. However, it is not clear whether this finding is equally applied to young women because of the lack of large scale prospective randomized studies. In this study, we compared the local control between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy alone for young women with breast cancer. We found that young women who underwent breast conserving therapy had an approximately 2.5-fold increased risk of local recurrence compared with those receiving mastectomy alone. The prognosis of young women who had local recurrence after breast conserving therapy were poor despite the aggressive salvage treatments. Therefore, the development of more effective novel systemic treatments is required to improve treatment outcomes in young women with breast cancer receiving breast conserving therapy. ABSTRACT: We compared the cumulative incidence of local recurrence in young patients (≤40 years) with breast cancer between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy alone. Among 428 women with early-stage breast cancer who were treated between 2001 and 2012, 311 underwent BCT and 117 underwent mastectomy alone. Adjuvant systemic treatments were administered to 409 patients (95.6%). We compared the cumulative incidence of LR and survival rates between two groups. During a median follow-up period of 91 months, the 10-year cumulative incidence of LR was 9.3% (median interval of 36.5 months from surgery). Patients treated with BCT tended to have a higher risk for local recurrence (11.1% for BCT vs. 4.1% for mastectomy alone, p = 0.078). All patients with isolated LR after BCT (n = 23) underwent salvage mastectomy followed by systemic treatments. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival of patients with isolated LR after BCT were 44.2% and 82.2%, respectively. The BCT group exhibited an approximately 2.5-fold higher risk of LR than mastectomy alone group. Patients with isolated LR after BCT showed poor prognosis despite undergoing aggressive salvage treatments. The development of novel treatments should be investigated to reduce LR for improving prognosis and preserving cosmetic outcomes in young women. MDPI 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8124780/ /pubmed/33947007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092150 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nguyen, Dang Van
Kim, Sang-Won
Oh, Young-Taek
Noh, O Kyu
Jung, Yongsik
Chun, Mison
Yoon, Dae Sung
Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title_full Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title_fullStr Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title_full_unstemmed Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title_short Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone
title_sort local recurrence in young women with breast cancer: breast conserving therapy vs. mastectomy alone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092150
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyendangvan localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT kimsangwon localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT ohyoungtaek localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT nohokyu localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT jungyongsik localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT chunmison localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone
AT yoondaesung localrecurrenceinyoungwomenwithbreastcancerbreastconservingtherapyvsmastectomyalone