Cargando…

Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles

With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shamim, Nimat, Thomsen, Edwin C., Viswanathan, Vilayanur V., Reed, David M., Sprenkle, Vincent L., Li, Guosheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280
_version_ 1783693377042120704
author Shamim, Nimat
Thomsen, Edwin C.
Viswanathan, Vilayanur V.
Reed, David M.
Sprenkle, Vincent L.
Li, Guosheng
author_facet Shamim, Nimat
Thomsen, Edwin C.
Viswanathan, Vilayanur V.
Reed, David M.
Sprenkle, Vincent L.
Li, Guosheng
author_sort Shamim, Nimat
collection PubMed
description With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested with a full capacity cycle consisting of a charging process (factory default) and a discharging process with a current of 40 A. The battery energy efficiency (discharge vs. charge) is about 90%, and the overall energy efficiency is 80.9%, which includes the auxiliary power used to run the battery management system electronics and self-heating to maintain the module operating temperature (265 °C). Generally, because of the increased self-heating during the holding times that exist for the peak shaving duty cycles, the overall module efficiency decreases slightly for the peak-shaving duty cycles (70.7–71.8%) compared to the full-capacity duty cycle. With a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle, the overall energy efficiency increases from 71.8% for 7.5 kWh energy utilization to 74.1% for 8.5 kWh. We conducted long-term cycling tests of the module at a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle with 7.5 kWh energy utilization, and the module exhibited a capacity degradation rate of 0.0046%/cycle over 150 cycles (>150 days).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81250182021-05-17 Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles Shamim, Nimat Thomsen, Edwin C. Viswanathan, Vilayanur V. Reed, David M. Sprenkle, Vincent L. Li, Guosheng Materials (Basel) Article With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested with a full capacity cycle consisting of a charging process (factory default) and a discharging process with a current of 40 A. The battery energy efficiency (discharge vs. charge) is about 90%, and the overall energy efficiency is 80.9%, which includes the auxiliary power used to run the battery management system electronics and self-heating to maintain the module operating temperature (265 °C). Generally, because of the increased self-heating during the holding times that exist for the peak shaving duty cycles, the overall module efficiency decreases slightly for the peak-shaving duty cycles (70.7–71.8%) compared to the full-capacity duty cycle. With a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle, the overall energy efficiency increases from 71.8% for 7.5 kWh energy utilization to 74.1% for 8.5 kWh. We conducted long-term cycling tests of the module at a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle with 7.5 kWh energy utilization, and the module exhibited a capacity degradation rate of 0.0046%/cycle over 150 cycles (>150 days). MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8125018/ /pubmed/33925015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shamim, Nimat
Thomsen, Edwin C.
Viswanathan, Vilayanur V.
Reed, David M.
Sprenkle, Vincent L.
Li, Guosheng
Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title_full Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title_fullStr Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title_short Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
title_sort evaluating zebra battery module under the peak-shaving duty cycles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280
work_keys_str_mv AT shamimnimat evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles
AT thomsenedwinc evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles
AT viswanathanvilayanurv evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles
AT reeddavidm evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles
AT sprenklevincentl evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles
AT liguosheng evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles