Cargando…
Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles
With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280 |
_version_ | 1783693377042120704 |
---|---|
author | Shamim, Nimat Thomsen, Edwin C. Viswanathan, Vilayanur V. Reed, David M. Sprenkle, Vincent L. Li, Guosheng |
author_facet | Shamim, Nimat Thomsen, Edwin C. Viswanathan, Vilayanur V. Reed, David M. Sprenkle, Vincent L. Li, Guosheng |
author_sort | Shamim, Nimat |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested with a full capacity cycle consisting of a charging process (factory default) and a discharging process with a current of 40 A. The battery energy efficiency (discharge vs. charge) is about 90%, and the overall energy efficiency is 80.9%, which includes the auxiliary power used to run the battery management system electronics and self-heating to maintain the module operating temperature (265 °C). Generally, because of the increased self-heating during the holding times that exist for the peak shaving duty cycles, the overall module efficiency decreases slightly for the peak-shaving duty cycles (70.7–71.8%) compared to the full-capacity duty cycle. With a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle, the overall energy efficiency increases from 71.8% for 7.5 kWh energy utilization to 74.1% for 8.5 kWh. We conducted long-term cycling tests of the module at a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle with 7.5 kWh energy utilization, and the module exhibited a capacity degradation rate of 0.0046%/cycle over 150 cycles (>150 days). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8125018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81250182021-05-17 Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles Shamim, Nimat Thomsen, Edwin C. Viswanathan, Vilayanur V. Reed, David M. Sprenkle, Vincent L. Li, Guosheng Materials (Basel) Article With the recent rapid increase in demand for reliable, long-cycle life, and safe battery technologies for large-scale energy-storage applications, a battery module based on ZEBRA battery chemistry is extensively evaluated for its application in peak shaving duty cycles. First, this module is tested with a full capacity cycle consisting of a charging process (factory default) and a discharging process with a current of 40 A. The battery energy efficiency (discharge vs. charge) is about 90%, and the overall energy efficiency is 80.9%, which includes the auxiliary power used to run the battery management system electronics and self-heating to maintain the module operating temperature (265 °C). Generally, because of the increased self-heating during the holding times that exist for the peak shaving duty cycles, the overall module efficiency decreases slightly for the peak-shaving duty cycles (70.7–71.8%) compared to the full-capacity duty cycle. With a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle, the overall energy efficiency increases from 71.8% for 7.5 kWh energy utilization to 74.1% for 8.5 kWh. We conducted long-term cycling tests of the module at a 6 h, peak-shaving duty cycle with 7.5 kWh energy utilization, and the module exhibited a capacity degradation rate of 0.0046%/cycle over 150 cycles (>150 days). MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8125018/ /pubmed/33925015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shamim, Nimat Thomsen, Edwin C. Viswanathan, Vilayanur V. Reed, David M. Sprenkle, Vincent L. Li, Guosheng Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title | Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title_full | Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title_fullStr | Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title_short | Evaluating ZEBRA Battery Module under the Peak-Shaving Duty Cycles |
title_sort | evaluating zebra battery module under the peak-shaving duty cycles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shamimnimat evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles AT thomsenedwinc evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles AT viswanathanvilayanurv evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles AT reeddavidm evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles AT sprenklevincentl evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles AT liguosheng evaluatingzebrabatterymoduleunderthepeakshavingdutycycles |