Cargando…

The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of retainer material and retainer position on a tooth to resist movement of the tooth in a simulation model. Bidirectional continuous glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) retainers and control retainers of steel wires were tested. The FRC ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohtonen, Jaana, Lassila, Lippo, Säilynoja, Eija, Vallittu, Pekka K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092319
_version_ 1783693501359194112
author Ohtonen, Jaana
Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Vallittu, Pekka K.
author_facet Ohtonen, Jaana
Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Vallittu, Pekka K.
author_sort Ohtonen, Jaana
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of retainer material and retainer position on a tooth to resist movement of the tooth in a simulation model. Bidirectional continuous glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) retainers and control retainers of steel wires were tested. The FRC retainers had a polymer matrix of bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (bis-GMA) and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), and it was cured with a photoinitiator system. The retainers were adhered to a lower jaw Frasaco model in two different positions. Resistance against the movement of one tooth was measured from two directions. The average load values within the FRC retainer groups were higher than within the metal retainer groups. The load values for the groups loaded from the axial direction were higher than those loaded from the buccal direction. FRC retainers, which were located 1–2 mm from the incisal edge, showed higher load values than those located 4–5 mm from the incisal edge. There was a significant difference in load values between FRC retainers and metal retainers (p < 0.01). The wire position and the direction of force also had significant effects (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between metal retainer groups. The results of this study suggest that metal retainers are more flexible, allowing for tooth movements of larger magnitude than with FRC retainers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81254352021-05-17 The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces Ohtonen, Jaana Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Vallittu, Pekka K. Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of retainer material and retainer position on a tooth to resist movement of the tooth in a simulation model. Bidirectional continuous glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) retainers and control retainers of steel wires were tested. The FRC retainers had a polymer matrix of bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (bis-GMA) and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), and it was cured with a photoinitiator system. The retainers were adhered to a lower jaw Frasaco model in two different positions. Resistance against the movement of one tooth was measured from two directions. The average load values within the FRC retainer groups were higher than within the metal retainer groups. The load values for the groups loaded from the axial direction were higher than those loaded from the buccal direction. FRC retainers, which were located 1–2 mm from the incisal edge, showed higher load values than those located 4–5 mm from the incisal edge. There was a significant difference in load values between FRC retainers and metal retainers (p < 0.01). The wire position and the direction of force also had significant effects (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between metal retainer groups. The results of this study suggest that metal retainers are more flexible, allowing for tooth movements of larger magnitude than with FRC retainers. MDPI 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8125435/ /pubmed/33947055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092319 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ohtonen, Jaana
Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Vallittu, Pekka K.
The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title_full The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title_fullStr The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title_short The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces
title_sort effect of material type and location of an orthodontic retainer in resisting axial or buccal forces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092319
work_keys_str_mv AT ohtonenjaana theeffectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT lassilalippo theeffectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT sailynojaeija theeffectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT vallittupekkak theeffectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT ohtonenjaana effectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT lassilalippo effectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT sailynojaeija effectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces
AT vallittupekkak effectofmaterialtypeandlocationofanorthodonticretainerinresistingaxialorbuccalforces