Cargando…
Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135 |
_version_ | 1783693504812154880 |
---|---|
author | Granata, Vincenza Caruso, Damiano Grassi, Roberto Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Rizzati, Roberto Masselli, Gabriele Golfieri, Rita Rengo, Marco Regge, Daniele Lo Re, Giuseppe Pradella, Silvia Fusco, Roberta Faggioni, Lorenzo Laghi, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Neri, Emanuele Coppola, Francesca |
author_facet | Granata, Vincenza Caruso, Damiano Grassi, Roberto Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Rizzati, Roberto Masselli, Gabriele Golfieri, Rita Rengo, Marco Regge, Daniele Lo Re, Giuseppe Pradella, Silvia Fusco, Roberta Faggioni, Lorenzo Laghi, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Neri, Emanuele Coppola, Francesca |
author_sort | Granata, Vincenza |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. ABSTRACT: Background: Structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. Materials and Methods: A panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated. Results: After the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2–4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2–4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (p < 0.01) and 0.82 (p < 0.01), respectively. The final SR version was built and included 53 items for RC staging and 50 items for RC restaging. Conclusions: The final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8125446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81254462021-05-17 Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal Granata, Vincenza Caruso, Damiano Grassi, Roberto Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Rizzati, Roberto Masselli, Gabriele Golfieri, Rita Rengo, Marco Regge, Daniele Lo Re, Giuseppe Pradella, Silvia Fusco, Roberta Faggioni, Lorenzo Laghi, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Neri, Emanuele Coppola, Francesca Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. ABSTRACT: Background: Structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. Materials and Methods: A panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated. Results: After the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2–4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2–4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (p < 0.01) and 0.82 (p < 0.01), respectively. The final SR version was built and included 53 items for RC staging and 50 items for RC restaging. Conclusions: The final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8125446/ /pubmed/33925250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Granata, Vincenza Caruso, Damiano Grassi, Roberto Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Rizzati, Roberto Masselli, Gabriele Golfieri, Rita Rengo, Marco Regge, Daniele Lo Re, Giuseppe Pradella, Silvia Fusco, Roberta Faggioni, Lorenzo Laghi, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Neri, Emanuele Coppola, Francesca Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title | Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title_full | Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title_fullStr | Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title_full_unstemmed | Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title_short | Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal |
title_sort | structured reporting of rectal cancer staging and restaging: a consensus proposal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granatavincenza structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT carusodamiano structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT grassiroberto structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT cappabiancasalvatore structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT reginellialfonso structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT rizzatiroberto structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT masselligabriele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT golfieririta structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT rengomarco structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT reggedaniele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT loregiuseppe structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT pradellasilvia structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT fuscoroberta structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT faggionilorenzo structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT laghiandrea structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT mielevittorio structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT neriemanuele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal AT coppolafrancesca structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal |