Cargando…

Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granata, Vincenza, Caruso, Damiano, Grassi, Roberto, Cappabianca, Salvatore, Reginelli, Alfonso, Rizzati, Roberto, Masselli, Gabriele, Golfieri, Rita, Rengo, Marco, Regge, Daniele, Lo Re, Giuseppe, Pradella, Silvia, Fusco, Roberta, Faggioni, Lorenzo, Laghi, Andrea, Miele, Vittorio, Neri, Emanuele, Coppola, Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135
_version_ 1783693504812154880
author Granata, Vincenza
Caruso, Damiano
Grassi, Roberto
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Rizzati, Roberto
Masselli, Gabriele
Golfieri, Rita
Rengo, Marco
Regge, Daniele
Lo Re, Giuseppe
Pradella, Silvia
Fusco, Roberta
Faggioni, Lorenzo
Laghi, Andrea
Miele, Vittorio
Neri, Emanuele
Coppola, Francesca
author_facet Granata, Vincenza
Caruso, Damiano
Grassi, Roberto
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Rizzati, Roberto
Masselli, Gabriele
Golfieri, Rita
Rengo, Marco
Regge, Daniele
Lo Re, Giuseppe
Pradella, Silvia
Fusco, Roberta
Faggioni, Lorenzo
Laghi, Andrea
Miele, Vittorio
Neri, Emanuele
Coppola, Francesca
author_sort Granata, Vincenza
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. ABSTRACT: Background: Structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. Materials and Methods: A panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated. Results: After the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2–4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2–4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (p < 0.01) and 0.82 (p < 0.01), respectively. The final SR version was built and included 53 items for RC staging and 50 items for RC restaging. Conclusions: The final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81254462021-05-17 Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal Granata, Vincenza Caruso, Damiano Grassi, Roberto Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Rizzati, Roberto Masselli, Gabriele Golfieri, Rita Rengo, Marco Regge, Daniele Lo Re, Giuseppe Pradella, Silvia Fusco, Roberta Faggioni, Lorenzo Laghi, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Neri, Emanuele Coppola, Francesca Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. ABSTRACT: Background: Structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. Materials and Methods: A panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated. Results: After the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2–4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2–4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (p < 0.01) and 0.82 (p < 0.01), respectively. The final SR version was built and included 53 items for RC staging and 50 items for RC restaging. Conclusions: The final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8125446/ /pubmed/33925250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Granata, Vincenza
Caruso, Damiano
Grassi, Roberto
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Rizzati, Roberto
Masselli, Gabriele
Golfieri, Rita
Rengo, Marco
Regge, Daniele
Lo Re, Giuseppe
Pradella, Silvia
Fusco, Roberta
Faggioni, Lorenzo
Laghi, Andrea
Miele, Vittorio
Neri, Emanuele
Coppola, Francesca
Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title_full Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title_fullStr Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title_full_unstemmed Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title_short Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal
title_sort structured reporting of rectal cancer staging and restaging: a consensus proposal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092135
work_keys_str_mv AT granatavincenza structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT carusodamiano structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT grassiroberto structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT cappabiancasalvatore structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT reginellialfonso structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT rizzatiroberto structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT masselligabriele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT golfieririta structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT rengomarco structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT reggedaniele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT loregiuseppe structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT pradellasilvia structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT fuscoroberta structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT faggionilorenzo structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT laghiandrea structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT mielevittorio structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT neriemanuele structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal
AT coppolafrancesca structuredreportingofrectalcancerstagingandrestagingaconsensusproposal