Cargando…

An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation

Negative obstacles have long been a challenging aspect of autonomous navigation for ground vehicles. However, as terrestrial lidar sensors have become lighter and less costly, they have increasingly been deployed on small, low-flying UAV, affording an opportunity to use these sensors to aid in auton...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodin, Christopher, Carrillo, Justin, Monroe, J. Gabriel, Carruth, Daniel W., Hudson, Christopher R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093211
_version_ 1783693527078666240
author Goodin, Christopher
Carrillo, Justin
Monroe, J. Gabriel
Carruth, Daniel W.
Hudson, Christopher R.
author_facet Goodin, Christopher
Carrillo, Justin
Monroe, J. Gabriel
Carruth, Daniel W.
Hudson, Christopher R.
author_sort Goodin, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Negative obstacles have long been a challenging aspect of autonomous navigation for ground vehicles. However, as terrestrial lidar sensors have become lighter and less costly, they have increasingly been deployed on small, low-flying UAV, affording an opportunity to use these sensors to aid in autonomous navigation. In this work, we develop an analytical model for predicting the ability of UAV or UGV mounted lidar sensors to detect negative obstacles. This analytical model improves upon past work in this area because it takes the sensor rotation rate and vehicle speed into account, as well as being valid for both large and small view angles. This analytical model is used to predict the influence of velocity on detection range for a negative obstacle and determine a limiting speed when accounting for vehicle stopping distance. Finally, the analytical model is validated with a physics-based simulator in realistic terrain. The results indicate that the analytical model is valid for altitudes above 10 m and show that there are drastic improvements in negative obstacle detection when using a UAV-mounted lidar. It is shown that negative obstacle detection ranges for various UAV-mounted lidar are 60–110 m, depending on the speed of the UAV and the type of lidar used. In contrast, detection ranges for UGV mounted lidar are found to be less than 10 m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81255192021-05-17 An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation Goodin, Christopher Carrillo, Justin Monroe, J. Gabriel Carruth, Daniel W. Hudson, Christopher R. Sensors (Basel) Communication Negative obstacles have long been a challenging aspect of autonomous navigation for ground vehicles. However, as terrestrial lidar sensors have become lighter and less costly, they have increasingly been deployed on small, low-flying UAV, affording an opportunity to use these sensors to aid in autonomous navigation. In this work, we develop an analytical model for predicting the ability of UAV or UGV mounted lidar sensors to detect negative obstacles. This analytical model improves upon past work in this area because it takes the sensor rotation rate and vehicle speed into account, as well as being valid for both large and small view angles. This analytical model is used to predict the influence of velocity on detection range for a negative obstacle and determine a limiting speed when accounting for vehicle stopping distance. Finally, the analytical model is validated with a physics-based simulator in realistic terrain. The results indicate that the analytical model is valid for altitudes above 10 m and show that there are drastic improvements in negative obstacle detection when using a UAV-mounted lidar. It is shown that negative obstacle detection ranges for various UAV-mounted lidar are 60–110 m, depending on the speed of the UAV and the type of lidar used. In contrast, detection ranges for UGV mounted lidar are found to be less than 10 m. MDPI 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8125519/ /pubmed/34063133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093211 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Goodin, Christopher
Carrillo, Justin
Monroe, J. Gabriel
Carruth, Daniel W.
Hudson, Christopher R.
An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title_full An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title_fullStr An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title_full_unstemmed An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title_short An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation
title_sort analytic model for negative obstacle detection with lidar and numerical validation using physics-based simulation
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21093211
work_keys_str_mv AT goodinchristopher ananalyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT carrillojustin ananalyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT monroejgabriel ananalyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT carruthdanielw ananalyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT hudsonchristopherr ananalyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT goodinchristopher analyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT carrillojustin analyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT monroejgabriel analyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT carruthdanielw analyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation
AT hudsonchristopherr analyticmodelfornegativeobstacledetectionwithlidarandnumericalvalidationusingphysicsbasedsimulation