Cargando…
Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421 |
_version_ | 1783693547654873088 |
---|---|
author | Matsuoka, Takashi Nakano, Tamaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ono, Shinji Watanabe, Shota Sato, Takumi Yatani, Hirofumi |
author_facet | Matsuoka, Takashi Nakano, Tamaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ono, Shinji Watanabe, Shota Sato, Takumi Yatani, Hirofumi |
author_sort | Matsuoka, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical influences of the implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on the inter-implant bone by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Three computer-aided design models of two-piece implants were designed: external connection (EC), internal connection (IC), and conical connection (CC). In each model, two identical implants were placed with inter-implant distances of 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mm. The maximum principal stress and microgap were evaluated. The stress values of the inter-implant bone decreased in the following order: IC, EC, and CC. The microgap decreased in the following order: EC, IC, and CC. Regardless of the type of implant–abutment connection, the stress of the inter-implant bone increased as the inter-implant distance decreased. The microgap barely changed as the inter-implant distance decreased. A CC implant is a mechanically advantageous implant–abutment connection type for maintenance of the inter-implant bone. With an inter-implant distance of less than 3.0 mm, use of a CC implant might suppress absorption of the inter-implant bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8125587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81255872021-05-17 Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Matsuoka, Takashi Nakano, Tamaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ono, Shinji Watanabe, Shota Sato, Takumi Yatani, Hirofumi Materials (Basel) Article The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical influences of the implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on the inter-implant bone by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Three computer-aided design models of two-piece implants were designed: external connection (EC), internal connection (IC), and conical connection (CC). In each model, two identical implants were placed with inter-implant distances of 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mm. The maximum principal stress and microgap were evaluated. The stress values of the inter-implant bone decreased in the following order: IC, EC, and CC. The microgap decreased in the following order: EC, IC, and CC. Regardless of the type of implant–abutment connection, the stress of the inter-implant bone increased as the inter-implant distance decreased. The microgap barely changed as the inter-implant distance decreased. A CC implant is a mechanically advantageous implant–abutment connection type for maintenance of the inter-implant bone. With an inter-implant distance of less than 3.0 mm, use of a CC implant might suppress absorption of the inter-implant bone. MDPI 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8125587/ /pubmed/34066506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matsuoka, Takashi Nakano, Tamaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ono, Shinji Watanabe, Shota Sato, Takumi Yatani, Hirofumi Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title | Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_full | Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_short | Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_sort | effects of implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on inter-implant bone stress and microgap: three-dimensional finite element analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuokatakashi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT nakanotamaki effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT yamaguchisatoshi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT onoshinji effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT watanabeshota effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT satotakumi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT yatanihirofumi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis |