Cargando…

Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuoka, Takashi, Nakano, Tamaki, Yamaguchi, Satoshi, Ono, Shinji, Watanabe, Shota, Sato, Takumi, Yatani, Hirofumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421
_version_ 1783693547654873088
author Matsuoka, Takashi
Nakano, Tamaki
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ono, Shinji
Watanabe, Shota
Sato, Takumi
Yatani, Hirofumi
author_facet Matsuoka, Takashi
Nakano, Tamaki
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ono, Shinji
Watanabe, Shota
Sato, Takumi
Yatani, Hirofumi
author_sort Matsuoka, Takashi
collection PubMed
description The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical influences of the implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on the inter-implant bone by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Three computer-aided design models of two-piece implants were designed: external connection (EC), internal connection (IC), and conical connection (CC). In each model, two identical implants were placed with inter-implant distances of 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mm. The maximum principal stress and microgap were evaluated. The stress values of the inter-implant bone decreased in the following order: IC, EC, and CC. The microgap decreased in the following order: EC, IC, and CC. Regardless of the type of implant–abutment connection, the stress of the inter-implant bone increased as the inter-implant distance decreased. The microgap barely changed as the inter-implant distance decreased. A CC implant is a mechanically advantageous implant–abutment connection type for maintenance of the inter-implant bone. With an inter-implant distance of less than 3.0 mm, use of a CC implant might suppress absorption of the inter-implant bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81255872021-05-17 Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Matsuoka, Takashi Nakano, Tamaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ono, Shinji Watanabe, Shota Sato, Takumi Yatani, Hirofumi Materials (Basel) Article The attainment of a good aesthetic outcome in dental implant treatment requires inter-implant papilla reconstruction, which is very difficult to perform. Maintenance of the inter-implant bone is essential for maintenance of the inter-implant papilla. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical influences of the implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on the inter-implant bone by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Three computer-aided design models of two-piece implants were designed: external connection (EC), internal connection (IC), and conical connection (CC). In each model, two identical implants were placed with inter-implant distances of 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mm. The maximum principal stress and microgap were evaluated. The stress values of the inter-implant bone decreased in the following order: IC, EC, and CC. The microgap decreased in the following order: EC, IC, and CC. Regardless of the type of implant–abutment connection, the stress of the inter-implant bone increased as the inter-implant distance decreased. The microgap barely changed as the inter-implant distance decreased. A CC implant is a mechanically advantageous implant–abutment connection type for maintenance of the inter-implant bone. With an inter-implant distance of less than 3.0 mm, use of a CC implant might suppress absorption of the inter-implant bone. MDPI 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8125587/ /pubmed/34066506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matsuoka, Takashi
Nakano, Tamaki
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ono, Shinji
Watanabe, Shota
Sato, Takumi
Yatani, Hirofumi
Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_full Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_short Effects of Implant–Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_sort effects of implant–abutment connection type and inter-implant distance on inter-implant bone stress and microgap: three-dimensional finite element analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092421
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuokatakashi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT nakanotamaki effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT yamaguchisatoshi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT onoshinji effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT watanabeshota effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT satotakumi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT yatanihirofumi effectsofimplantabutmentconnectiontypeandinterimplantdistanceoninterimplantbonestressandmicrogapthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis