Cargando…

Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Hao-Chien, Lee, Chen-Fang, Cheng, Ssu-Min, Lee, Wei-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014
_version_ 1783693615498788864
author Hung, Hao-Chien
Lee, Chen-Fang
Cheng, Ssu-Min
Lee, Wei-Chen
author_facet Hung, Hao-Chien
Lee, Chen-Fang
Cheng, Ssu-Min
Lee, Wei-Chen
author_sort Hung, Hao-Chien
collection PubMed
description Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collected and simplified by dichotomization, and these categories and other clinical factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to select independent risks in constructing a “graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)-SOFA” scoring system. Results: We enrolled 519 patients who underwent LDLT. The GRWR-SOFA score comprises a sum of six factors: cardiovascular (mean arterial pressure < 70 mmHg, scored 3), coagulation (serum platelet < 50 × 10(3)/μL, scored 2), renal (creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, scored 2), liver (serum total bilirubin > 5.9 mg/dL, scored 5), neurological (Glasgow coma scale < 15, scored 2), and GRWR < 0.8, scored 2. The GRWR-SOFA contained four classes: The early mortality rate at 3 months and 1 year after LDLT was 1.3% and 6.9% for class I (scores of 0–4), 9.1% and 16.7% for class II (scores of 5–8), 25.5% and 34% for class III (scores of 9–10), and 61.3% and 67.7% for class IV (scores ≥ 11), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of GRWR-SOFA in the 3-month mortality prediction was 0.881 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.818–0.944). Conclusions: The GRWR-SOFA model demonstrates superior discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality. It enables clinicians to identify the right level of care for distinct subgroups of patients receiving LDLT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8125826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81258262021-05-17 Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Hung, Hao-Chien Lee, Chen-Fang Cheng, Ssu-Min Lee, Wei-Chen J Clin Med Article Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collected and simplified by dichotomization, and these categories and other clinical factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to select independent risks in constructing a “graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)-SOFA” scoring system. Results: We enrolled 519 patients who underwent LDLT. The GRWR-SOFA score comprises a sum of six factors: cardiovascular (mean arterial pressure < 70 mmHg, scored 3), coagulation (serum platelet < 50 × 10(3)/μL, scored 2), renal (creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, scored 2), liver (serum total bilirubin > 5.9 mg/dL, scored 5), neurological (Glasgow coma scale < 15, scored 2), and GRWR < 0.8, scored 2. The GRWR-SOFA contained four classes: The early mortality rate at 3 months and 1 year after LDLT was 1.3% and 6.9% for class I (scores of 0–4), 9.1% and 16.7% for class II (scores of 5–8), 25.5% and 34% for class III (scores of 9–10), and 61.3% and 67.7% for class IV (scores ≥ 11), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of GRWR-SOFA in the 3-month mortality prediction was 0.881 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.818–0.944). Conclusions: The GRWR-SOFA model demonstrates superior discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality. It enables clinicians to identify the right level of care for distinct subgroups of patients receiving LDLT. MDPI 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8125826/ /pubmed/34066742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hung, Hao-Chien
Lee, Chen-Fang
Cheng, Ssu-Min
Lee, Wei-Chen
Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_short Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_sort developing a novel scoring system for risk stratification in living donor liver transplantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014
work_keys_str_mv AT hunghaochien developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT leechenfang developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT chengssumin developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT leeweichen developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation