Cargando…
Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014 |
_version_ | 1783693615498788864 |
---|---|
author | Hung, Hao-Chien Lee, Chen-Fang Cheng, Ssu-Min Lee, Wei-Chen |
author_facet | Hung, Hao-Chien Lee, Chen-Fang Cheng, Ssu-Min Lee, Wei-Chen |
author_sort | Hung, Hao-Chien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collected and simplified by dichotomization, and these categories and other clinical factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to select independent risks in constructing a “graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)-SOFA” scoring system. Results: We enrolled 519 patients who underwent LDLT. The GRWR-SOFA score comprises a sum of six factors: cardiovascular (mean arterial pressure < 70 mmHg, scored 3), coagulation (serum platelet < 50 × 10(3)/μL, scored 2), renal (creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, scored 2), liver (serum total bilirubin > 5.9 mg/dL, scored 5), neurological (Glasgow coma scale < 15, scored 2), and GRWR < 0.8, scored 2. The GRWR-SOFA contained four classes: The early mortality rate at 3 months and 1 year after LDLT was 1.3% and 6.9% for class I (scores of 0–4), 9.1% and 16.7% for class II (scores of 5–8), 25.5% and 34% for class III (scores of 9–10), and 61.3% and 67.7% for class IV (scores ≥ 11), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of GRWR-SOFA in the 3-month mortality prediction was 0.881 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.818–0.944). Conclusions: The GRWR-SOFA model demonstrates superior discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality. It enables clinicians to identify the right level of care for distinct subgroups of patients receiving LDLT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8125826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81258262021-05-17 Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Hung, Hao-Chien Lee, Chen-Fang Cheng, Ssu-Min Lee, Wei-Chen J Clin Med Article Background: We aimed to develop a novel scoring system for risk stratification specific to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, to improve the accuracy of predicting short-term outcomes. Methods: The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at postoperative day 7 was collected and simplified by dichotomization, and these categories and other clinical factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to select independent risks in constructing a “graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)-SOFA” scoring system. Results: We enrolled 519 patients who underwent LDLT. The GRWR-SOFA score comprises a sum of six factors: cardiovascular (mean arterial pressure < 70 mmHg, scored 3), coagulation (serum platelet < 50 × 10(3)/μL, scored 2), renal (creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, scored 2), liver (serum total bilirubin > 5.9 mg/dL, scored 5), neurological (Glasgow coma scale < 15, scored 2), and GRWR < 0.8, scored 2. The GRWR-SOFA contained four classes: The early mortality rate at 3 months and 1 year after LDLT was 1.3% and 6.9% for class I (scores of 0–4), 9.1% and 16.7% for class II (scores of 5–8), 25.5% and 34% for class III (scores of 9–10), and 61.3% and 67.7% for class IV (scores ≥ 11), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of GRWR-SOFA in the 3-month mortality prediction was 0.881 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.818–0.944). Conclusions: The GRWR-SOFA model demonstrates superior discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality. It enables clinicians to identify the right level of care for distinct subgroups of patients receiving LDLT. MDPI 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8125826/ /pubmed/34066742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hung, Hao-Chien Lee, Chen-Fang Cheng, Ssu-Min Lee, Wei-Chen Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title | Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title_full | Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title_short | Developing a Novel Scoring System for Risk Stratification in Living Donor Liver Transplantation |
title_sort | developing a novel scoring system for risk stratification in living donor liver transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8125826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunghaochien developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT leechenfang developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT chengssumin developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT leeweichen developinganovelscoringsystemforriskstratificationinlivingdonorlivertransplantation |