Cargando…

The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise

OBJECTIVES: Auditory perceptual learning studies tend to focus on the nature of the target stimuli. However, features of the background noise can also have a significant impact on the amount of benefit that participants obtain from training. This study explores whether perceptual learning of speech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Liping, Schlaghecken, Friederike, Harte, James, Roberts, Katherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.646137
_version_ 1783693801075769344
author Zhang, Liping
Schlaghecken, Friederike
Harte, James
Roberts, Katherine L.
author_facet Zhang, Liping
Schlaghecken, Friederike
Harte, James
Roberts, Katherine L.
author_sort Zhang, Liping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Auditory perceptual learning studies tend to focus on the nature of the target stimuli. However, features of the background noise can also have a significant impact on the amount of benefit that participants obtain from training. This study explores whether perceptual learning of speech in background babble noise generalizes to other, real-life environmental background noises (car and rain), and if the benefits are sustained over time. DESIGN: Normal-hearing native English speakers were randomly assigned to a training (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups completed a pre- and post-test session in which they identified Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) target words in babble, car, or rain noise. The training group completed speech-in-babble noise training on three consecutive days between the pre- and post-tests. A follow up session was conducted between 8 and 18 weeks after the post-test session (training group: n = 9; control group: n = 7). RESULTS: Participants who received training had significantly higher post-test word identification accuracy than control participants for all three types of noise, although benefits were greatest for the babble noise condition and weaker for the car- and rain-noise conditions. Both training and control groups maintained their pre- to post-test improvement over a period of several weeks for speech in babble noise, but returned to pre-test accuracy for speech in car and rain noise. CONCLUSION: The findings show that training benefits can show some generalization from speech-in-babble noise to speech in other types of environmental noise. Both groups sustained their learning over a period of several weeks for speech-in-babble noise. As the control group received equal exposure to all three noise types, the sustained learning with babble noise, but not other noises, implies that a structural feature of babble noise was conducive to the sustained improvement. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the background noise as well as the target stimuli in auditory perceptual learning studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81266332021-05-18 The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise Zhang, Liping Schlaghecken, Friederike Harte, James Roberts, Katherine L. Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: Auditory perceptual learning studies tend to focus on the nature of the target stimuli. However, features of the background noise can also have a significant impact on the amount of benefit that participants obtain from training. This study explores whether perceptual learning of speech in background babble noise generalizes to other, real-life environmental background noises (car and rain), and if the benefits are sustained over time. DESIGN: Normal-hearing native English speakers were randomly assigned to a training (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups completed a pre- and post-test session in which they identified Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) target words in babble, car, or rain noise. The training group completed speech-in-babble noise training on three consecutive days between the pre- and post-tests. A follow up session was conducted between 8 and 18 weeks after the post-test session (training group: n = 9; control group: n = 7). RESULTS: Participants who received training had significantly higher post-test word identification accuracy than control participants for all three types of noise, although benefits were greatest for the babble noise condition and weaker for the car- and rain-noise conditions. Both training and control groups maintained their pre- to post-test improvement over a period of several weeks for speech in babble noise, but returned to pre-test accuracy for speech in car and rain noise. CONCLUSION: The findings show that training benefits can show some generalization from speech-in-babble noise to speech in other types of environmental noise. Both groups sustained their learning over a period of several weeks for speech-in-babble noise. As the control group received equal exposure to all three noise types, the sustained learning with babble noise, but not other noises, implies that a structural feature of babble noise was conducive to the sustained improvement. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the background noise as well as the target stimuli in auditory perceptual learning studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8126633/ /pubmed/34012384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.646137 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Schlaghecken, Harte and Roberts. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zhang, Liping
Schlaghecken, Friederike
Harte, James
Roberts, Katherine L.
The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title_full The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title_fullStr The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title_short The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise
title_sort influence of the type of background noise on perceptual learning of speech in noise
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.646137
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangliping theinfluenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT schlagheckenfriederike theinfluenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT hartejames theinfluenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT robertskatherinel theinfluenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT zhangliping influenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT schlagheckenfriederike influenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT hartejames influenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise
AT robertskatherinel influenceofthetypeofbackgroundnoiseonperceptuallearningofspeechinnoise