Cargando…
Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007938 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337 |
_version_ | 1783693816768757760 |
---|---|
author | Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet Alvarez, Mario Moisés Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de |
author_facet | Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet Alvarez, Mario Moisés Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de |
author_sort | Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cell types, hydrogels, and additives) were reviewed. The cost, availability, practicality, and basic biological considerations (e.g., cytocompatibility and cell attachment) are the most popular parameters guiding bioink use and development. Today, extrusion bioprinting is the most widely used bioprinting technique. The most reported use of bioinks is the generic characterization of bioink formulations or bioprinting technologies (32%), followed by cartilage bioprinting applications (16%). Similarly, the cell-type choice is mostly generic, as cells are typically used as models to assess bioink formulations or new bioprinting methodologies rather than to fabricate specific tissues. The cell-binding motif arginine-glycine-aspartate is the most common bioink additive. Many articles reported the development of advanced functional bioinks for specific biomedical applications; however, most bioinks remain the basic compositions that meet the simple criteria: Manufacturability and essential biological performance. Alginate and gelatin methacryloyl are the most popular hydrogels that meet these criteria. Our analysis suggests that present-day bioinks still represent a stage of emergence of bioprinting technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8126700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81267002021-05-17 Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet Alvarez, Mario Moisés Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de Int J Bioprint Research Article This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cell types, hydrogels, and additives) were reviewed. The cost, availability, practicality, and basic biological considerations (e.g., cytocompatibility and cell attachment) are the most popular parameters guiding bioink use and development. Today, extrusion bioprinting is the most widely used bioprinting technique. The most reported use of bioinks is the generic characterization of bioink formulations or bioprinting technologies (32%), followed by cartilage bioprinting applications (16%). Similarly, the cell-type choice is mostly generic, as cells are typically used as models to assess bioink formulations or new bioprinting methodologies rather than to fabricate specific tissues. The cell-binding motif arginine-glycine-aspartate is the most common bioink additive. Many articles reported the development of advanced functional bioinks for specific biomedical applications; however, most bioinks remain the basic compositions that meet the simple criteria: Manufacturability and essential biological performance. Alginate and gelatin methacryloyl are the most popular hydrogels that meet these criteria. Our analysis suggests that present-day bioinks still represent a stage of emergence of bioprinting technology. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8126700/ /pubmed/34007938 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Pedroza-González, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet Alvarez, Mario Moisés Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title | Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title_full | Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title_fullStr | Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title_short | Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress |
title_sort | bioinks for 3d bioprinting: a scientometric analysis of two decades of progress |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007938 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedrozagonzalezsaracristina bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress AT rodriguezsalvadormarisela bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress AT perezbenitezbarucemet bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress AT alvarezmariomoises bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress AT santiagogrisseltrujillode bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress |