Cargando…

Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress

This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina, Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela, Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet, Alvarez, Mario Moisés, Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007938
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337
_version_ 1783693816768757760
author Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina
Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela
Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet
Alvarez, Mario Moisés
Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de
author_facet Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina
Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela
Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet
Alvarez, Mario Moisés
Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de
author_sort Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina
collection PubMed
description This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cell types, hydrogels, and additives) were reviewed. The cost, availability, practicality, and basic biological considerations (e.g., cytocompatibility and cell attachment) are the most popular parameters guiding bioink use and development. Today, extrusion bioprinting is the most widely used bioprinting technique. The most reported use of bioinks is the generic characterization of bioink formulations or bioprinting technologies (32%), followed by cartilage bioprinting applications (16%). Similarly, the cell-type choice is mostly generic, as cells are typically used as models to assess bioink formulations or new bioprinting methodologies rather than to fabricate specific tissues. The cell-binding motif arginine-glycine-aspartate is the most common bioink additive. Many articles reported the development of advanced functional bioinks for specific biomedical applications; however, most bioinks remain the basic compositions that meet the simple criteria: Manufacturability and essential biological performance. Alginate and gelatin methacryloyl are the most popular hydrogels that meet these criteria. Our analysis suggests that present-day bioinks still represent a stage of emergence of bioprinting technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81267002021-05-17 Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet Alvarez, Mario Moisés Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de Int J Bioprint Research Article This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cell types, hydrogels, and additives) were reviewed. The cost, availability, practicality, and basic biological considerations (e.g., cytocompatibility and cell attachment) are the most popular parameters guiding bioink use and development. Today, extrusion bioprinting is the most widely used bioprinting technique. The most reported use of bioinks is the generic characterization of bioink formulations or bioprinting technologies (32%), followed by cartilage bioprinting applications (16%). Similarly, the cell-type choice is mostly generic, as cells are typically used as models to assess bioink formulations or new bioprinting methodologies rather than to fabricate specific tissues. The cell-binding motif arginine-glycine-aspartate is the most common bioink additive. Many articles reported the development of advanced functional bioinks for specific biomedical applications; however, most bioinks remain the basic compositions that meet the simple criteria: Manufacturability and essential biological performance. Alginate and gelatin methacryloyl are the most popular hydrogels that meet these criteria. Our analysis suggests that present-day bioinks still represent a stage of emergence of bioprinting technology. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8126700/ /pubmed/34007938 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Pedroza-González, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pedroza-González, Sara Cristina
Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela
Pérez-Benítez, Baruc Emet
Alvarez, Mario Moisés
Santiago, Grissel Trujillo-de
Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title_full Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title_fullStr Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title_full_unstemmed Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title_short Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress
title_sort bioinks for 3d bioprinting: a scientometric analysis of two decades of progress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007938
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.337
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrozagonzalezsaracristina bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress
AT rodriguezsalvadormarisela bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress
AT perezbenitezbarucemet bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress
AT alvarezmariomoises bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress
AT santiagogrisseltrujillode bioinksfor3dbioprintingascientometricanalysisoftwodecadesofprogress