Cargando…

A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases

OBJECTIVE: Antibodies against the small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti‐SAE autoantibodies in a North American c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albayda, Jemima, Mecoli, Christopher, Casciola‐Rosen, Livia, Danoff, Sonye K., Lin, Cheng Ting, Hines, David, Gutierrez‐Alamillo, Laura, Paik, Julie J., Tiniakou, Eleni, Mammen, Andrew L., Christopher‐Stine, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33774928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11247
_version_ 1783693831994081280
author Albayda, Jemima
Mecoli, Christopher
Casciola‐Rosen, Livia
Danoff, Sonye K.
Lin, Cheng Ting
Hines, David
Gutierrez‐Alamillo, Laura
Paik, Julie J.
Tiniakou, Eleni
Mammen, Andrew L.
Christopher‐Stine, Lisa
author_facet Albayda, Jemima
Mecoli, Christopher
Casciola‐Rosen, Livia
Danoff, Sonye K.
Lin, Cheng Ting
Hines, David
Gutierrez‐Alamillo, Laura
Paik, Julie J.
Tiniakou, Eleni
Mammen, Andrew L.
Christopher‐Stine, Lisa
author_sort Albayda, Jemima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Antibodies against the small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti‐SAE autoantibodies in a North American cohort and to ascertain cancer prevalence. We also describe the performance characteristics of the line blotting (Euroimmun) method for antibody detection compared with an immunoprecipitation‐based assay. METHODS: Sera from 2127 patients suspected of having myositis were assayed for myositis‐specific autoantibodies using the Euroimmun platform. Those positive for SAE autoantibodies were assayed by a second method (immunoprecipitation) for confirmation. Only those cases positive by both methods were taken as definite cases of anti‐SAE–positive DM. Chart reviews of these patients were completed to obtain information on clinical characteristics, cancer history, and treatment. RESULTS: Forty‐three of 2127 sera were anti‐SAE autoantibody positive by Euroimmun (≥15 units, +); of these, only 19 were confirmed positive by immunoprecipitation. All 19 cases had skin involvement and varying presentations of muscle, lung, and joint disease. Cancer occurred coincident with DM in two patients, and cancers were detected more than 5 years from symptom onset in three patients. In a population of suspected inflammatory myositis, a higher cutoff on line blot testing (≥36 units, ++) yielded better agreement with immunoprecipitation methods. CONCLUSION: SAE autoantibodies associate with a clinical phenotype of DM, which most commonly presents with a rash first, followed by muscle involvement and varying extramuscular involvement. As coincident cancer was seen in anti‐SAE–positive DM, judicious malignancy screening may be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81267602021-05-21 A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases Albayda, Jemima Mecoli, Christopher Casciola‐Rosen, Livia Danoff, Sonye K. Lin, Cheng Ting Hines, David Gutierrez‐Alamillo, Laura Paik, Julie J. Tiniakou, Eleni Mammen, Andrew L. Christopher‐Stine, Lisa ACR Open Rheumatol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Antibodies against the small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti‐SAE autoantibodies in a North American cohort and to ascertain cancer prevalence. We also describe the performance characteristics of the line blotting (Euroimmun) method for antibody detection compared with an immunoprecipitation‐based assay. METHODS: Sera from 2127 patients suspected of having myositis were assayed for myositis‐specific autoantibodies using the Euroimmun platform. Those positive for SAE autoantibodies were assayed by a second method (immunoprecipitation) for confirmation. Only those cases positive by both methods were taken as definite cases of anti‐SAE–positive DM. Chart reviews of these patients were completed to obtain information on clinical characteristics, cancer history, and treatment. RESULTS: Forty‐three of 2127 sera were anti‐SAE autoantibody positive by Euroimmun (≥15 units, +); of these, only 19 were confirmed positive by immunoprecipitation. All 19 cases had skin involvement and varying presentations of muscle, lung, and joint disease. Cancer occurred coincident with DM in two patients, and cancers were detected more than 5 years from symptom onset in three patients. In a population of suspected inflammatory myositis, a higher cutoff on line blot testing (≥36 units, ++) yielded better agreement with immunoprecipitation methods. CONCLUSION: SAE autoantibodies associate with a clinical phenotype of DM, which most commonly presents with a rash first, followed by muscle involvement and varying extramuscular involvement. As coincident cancer was seen in anti‐SAE–positive DM, judicious malignancy screening may be warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8126760/ /pubmed/33774928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11247 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Albayda, Jemima
Mecoli, Christopher
Casciola‐Rosen, Livia
Danoff, Sonye K.
Lin, Cheng Ting
Hines, David
Gutierrez‐Alamillo, Laura
Paik, Julie J.
Tiniakou, Eleni
Mammen, Andrew L.
Christopher‐Stine, Lisa
A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title_full A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title_fullStr A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title_full_unstemmed A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title_short A North American Cohort of Anti‐SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases
title_sort north american cohort of anti‐sae dermatomyositis: clinical phenotype, testing, and review of cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33774928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11247
work_keys_str_mv AT albaydajemima anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT mecolichristopher anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT casciolarosenlivia anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT danoffsonyek anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT linchengting anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT hinesdavid anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT gutierrezalamillolaura anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT paikjuliej anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT tiniakoueleni anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT mammenandrewl anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT christopherstinelisa anorthamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT albaydajemima northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT mecolichristopher northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT casciolarosenlivia northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT danoffsonyek northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT linchengting northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT hinesdavid northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT gutierrezalamillolaura northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT paikjuliej northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT tiniakoueleni northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT mammenandrewl northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases
AT christopherstinelisa northamericancohortofantisaedermatomyositisclinicalphenotypetestingandreviewofcases