Cargando…

A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy

In clinical terms, bone grafting currently involves the application of autogenous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, as well as natural or artificially synthesized materials, such as polymers, bioceramics, and other composites. Many of these are associated with limitations. The ideal scaffold f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Sijing, Wang, Mohan, He, Jiacai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10206
_version_ 1783693842983157760
author Jiang, Sijing
Wang, Mohan
He, Jiacai
author_facet Jiang, Sijing
Wang, Mohan
He, Jiacai
author_sort Jiang, Sijing
collection PubMed
description In clinical terms, bone grafting currently involves the application of autogenous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, as well as natural or artificially synthesized materials, such as polymers, bioceramics, and other composites. Many of these are associated with limitations. The ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should provide mechanical support while promoting osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and even osteoinduction. There are various structural complications and engineering difficulties to be considered. Here, we describe the biomimetic possibilities of the modification of natural or synthetic materials through physical and chemical design to facilitate bone tissue repair. This review summarizes recent progresses in the strategies for constructing biomimetic scaffolds, including ion‐functionalized scaffolds, decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds, and micro‐ and nano‐scale biomimetic scaffold structures, as well as reactive scaffolds induced by physical factors, and other acellular scaffolds. The fabrication techniques for these scaffolds, along with current strategies in clinical bone repair, are described. The developments in each category are discussed in terms of the connection between the scaffold materials and tissue repair, as well as the interactions with endogenous cells. As the advances in bone tissue engineering move toward application in the clinical setting, the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of these novel scaffold designs is critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81268272021-05-21 A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy Jiang, Sijing Wang, Mohan He, Jiacai Bioeng Transl Med Reviews In clinical terms, bone grafting currently involves the application of autogenous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, as well as natural or artificially synthesized materials, such as polymers, bioceramics, and other composites. Many of these are associated with limitations. The ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should provide mechanical support while promoting osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and even osteoinduction. There are various structural complications and engineering difficulties to be considered. Here, we describe the biomimetic possibilities of the modification of natural or synthetic materials through physical and chemical design to facilitate bone tissue repair. This review summarizes recent progresses in the strategies for constructing biomimetic scaffolds, including ion‐functionalized scaffolds, decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds, and micro‐ and nano‐scale biomimetic scaffold structures, as well as reactive scaffolds induced by physical factors, and other acellular scaffolds. The fabrication techniques for these scaffolds, along with current strategies in clinical bone repair, are described. The developments in each category are discussed in terms of the connection between the scaffold materials and tissue repair, as well as the interactions with endogenous cells. As the advances in bone tissue engineering move toward application in the clinical setting, the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of these novel scaffold designs is critical. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8126827/ /pubmed/34027093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10206 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Jiang, Sijing
Wang, Mohan
He, Jiacai
A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title_full A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title_fullStr A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title_full_unstemmed A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title_short A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy
title_sort review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: toward a cell‐free strategy
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10206
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangsijing areviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy
AT wangmohan areviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy
AT hejiacai areviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy
AT jiangsijing reviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy
AT wangmohan reviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy
AT hejiacai reviewofbiomimeticscaffoldsforboneregenerationtowardacellfreestrategy