Cargando…

Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Hong, Xie, Jin‐wei, Yang, Jing‐li, Huang, Ze‐yu, Pei, Fu‐xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969
_version_ 1783693854241718272
author Xu, Hong
Xie, Jin‐wei
Yang, Jing‐li
Huang, Ze‐yu
Pei, Fu‐xing
author_facet Xu, Hong
Xie, Jin‐wei
Yang, Jing‐li
Huang, Ze‐yu
Pei, Fu‐xing
author_sort Xu, Hong
collection PubMed
description The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81269162021-05-21 Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Xu, Hong Xie, Jin‐wei Yang, Jing‐li Huang, Ze‐yu Pei, Fu‐xing Orthop Surg Review Articles The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8126916/ /pubmed/33682337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Xu, Hong
Xie, Jin‐wei
Yang, Jing‐li
Huang, Ze‐yu
Pei, Fu‐xing
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort role of d‐dimer and fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhong roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejinwei roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangjingli roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangzeyu roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peifuxing roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis