Cargando…
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 |
_version_ | 1783693854241718272 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Hong Xie, Jin‐wei Yang, Jing‐li Huang, Ze‐yu Pei, Fu‐xing |
author_facet | Xu, Hong Xie, Jin‐wei Yang, Jing‐li Huang, Ze‐yu Pei, Fu‐xing |
author_sort | Xu, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8126916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81269162021-05-21 Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Xu, Hong Xie, Jin‐wei Yang, Jing‐li Huang, Ze‐yu Pei, Fu‐xing Orthop Surg Review Articles The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8126916/ /pubmed/33682337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Xu, Hong Xie, Jin‐wei Yang, Jing‐li Huang, Ze‐yu Pei, Fu‐xing Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title | Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full | Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_fullStr | Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_short | Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_sort | role of d‐dimer and fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33682337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuhong roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiejinwei roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangjingli roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangzeyu roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT peifuxing roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |