Cargando…

A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping

BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, Barry A, Keith, Shannon, Howerter, Amy, Doll, Helen, Pham, Timothy, Mehta, Rina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012257
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052
_version_ 1783693866417782784
author Singer, Barry A
Keith, Shannon
Howerter, Amy
Doll, Helen
Pham, Timothy
Mehta, Rina
author_facet Singer, Barry A
Keith, Shannon
Howerter, Amy
Doll, Helen
Pham, Timothy
Mehta, Rina
author_sort Singer, Barry A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsing-remitting MS and identify the most important patient-centered outcomes from patient and clinician perspectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients and 12 MS specialists in the United States provided statements describing what an ideal treatment would do to improve symptoms and daily functioning. Statements were sorted by participants into meaningful domains and rated on importance on an 11-point scale. RESULTS: Sixty-four unique statements supporting 6 domains of clustered concepts were generated. Patient and clinician ratings of importance were highly correlated (r=0.82); however, patients rated the domains of Activities of Daily Living, Prevent & Cure, and Address Symptoms as highest in importance, whereas clinicians rated Prevent & Cure, Safe & Effective, and Activities of Daily Living as highest in importance. Statements rated above the domain mean by both patients and clinicians included “Improve cognitive function” and “Improve motor function” in the Activities of Daily Living domain and “Help with memory issues” and “Help preserve cognition” in the Address Symptoms domain. The statement “Improve short term memory” was 1 of 3 statements rated above the domain mean by patients but below the domain mean by clinicians. CONCLUSION: High levels of agreement of concept importance were found between patients and MS specialists, although certain domains and statements were rated more highly by one group. Overall, concepts such as cognitive function, physical and emotional functioning, and activities of daily living were perceived as having great importance for treatment outcomes versus symptom-focused outcomes like gait or tingling sensations. This comprehensive concept model for the MS patient experience can be used for further development of patient-centered outcome measures in MS treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81269692021-05-18 A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping Singer, Barry A Keith, Shannon Howerter, Amy Doll, Helen Pham, Timothy Mehta, Rina Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsing-remitting MS and identify the most important patient-centered outcomes from patient and clinician perspectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients and 12 MS specialists in the United States provided statements describing what an ideal treatment would do to improve symptoms and daily functioning. Statements were sorted by participants into meaningful domains and rated on importance on an 11-point scale. RESULTS: Sixty-four unique statements supporting 6 domains of clustered concepts were generated. Patient and clinician ratings of importance were highly correlated (r=0.82); however, patients rated the domains of Activities of Daily Living, Prevent & Cure, and Address Symptoms as highest in importance, whereas clinicians rated Prevent & Cure, Safe & Effective, and Activities of Daily Living as highest in importance. Statements rated above the domain mean by both patients and clinicians included “Improve cognitive function” and “Improve motor function” in the Activities of Daily Living domain and “Help with memory issues” and “Help preserve cognition” in the Address Symptoms domain. The statement “Improve short term memory” was 1 of 3 statements rated above the domain mean by patients but below the domain mean by clinicians. CONCLUSION: High levels of agreement of concept importance were found between patients and MS specialists, although certain domains and statements were rated more highly by one group. Overall, concepts such as cognitive function, physical and emotional functioning, and activities of daily living were perceived as having great importance for treatment outcomes versus symptom-focused outcomes like gait or tingling sensations. This comprehensive concept model for the MS patient experience can be used for further development of patient-centered outcome measures in MS treatment. Dove 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8126969/ /pubmed/34012257 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052 Text en © 2021 Singer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Singer, Barry A
Keith, Shannon
Howerter, Amy
Doll, Helen
Pham, Timothy
Mehta, Rina
A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title_full A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title_fullStr A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title_full_unstemmed A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title_short A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
title_sort study comparing patient and clinician perspectives of treatments for multiple sclerosis via group concept mapping
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012257
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052
work_keys_str_mv AT singerbarrya astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT keithshannon astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT howerteramy astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT dollhelen astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT phamtimothy astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT mehtarina astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT singerbarrya studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT keithshannon studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT howerteramy studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT dollhelen studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT phamtimothy studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping
AT mehtarina studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping