Cargando…
A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping
BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012257 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052 |
_version_ | 1783693866417782784 |
---|---|
author | Singer, Barry A Keith, Shannon Howerter, Amy Doll, Helen Pham, Timothy Mehta, Rina |
author_facet | Singer, Barry A Keith, Shannon Howerter, Amy Doll, Helen Pham, Timothy Mehta, Rina |
author_sort | Singer, Barry A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsing-remitting MS and identify the most important patient-centered outcomes from patient and clinician perspectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients and 12 MS specialists in the United States provided statements describing what an ideal treatment would do to improve symptoms and daily functioning. Statements were sorted by participants into meaningful domains and rated on importance on an 11-point scale. RESULTS: Sixty-four unique statements supporting 6 domains of clustered concepts were generated. Patient and clinician ratings of importance were highly correlated (r=0.82); however, patients rated the domains of Activities of Daily Living, Prevent & Cure, and Address Symptoms as highest in importance, whereas clinicians rated Prevent & Cure, Safe & Effective, and Activities of Daily Living as highest in importance. Statements rated above the domain mean by both patients and clinicians included “Improve cognitive function” and “Improve motor function” in the Activities of Daily Living domain and “Help with memory issues” and “Help preserve cognition” in the Address Symptoms domain. The statement “Improve short term memory” was 1 of 3 statements rated above the domain mean by patients but below the domain mean by clinicians. CONCLUSION: High levels of agreement of concept importance were found between patients and MS specialists, although certain domains and statements were rated more highly by one group. Overall, concepts such as cognitive function, physical and emotional functioning, and activities of daily living were perceived as having great importance for treatment outcomes versus symptom-focused outcomes like gait or tingling sensations. This comprehensive concept model for the MS patient experience can be used for further development of patient-centered outcome measures in MS treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8126969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81269692021-05-18 A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping Singer, Barry A Keith, Shannon Howerter, Amy Doll, Helen Pham, Timothy Mehta, Rina Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinicians treating multiple sclerosis (MS) should consider patient preferences when making treatment decisions. An online mixed-methods approach to elicit patient-centered concepts, group concept mapping (GCM), was used to generate statements reflecting the patient experience in relapsing-remitting MS and identify the most important patient-centered outcomes from patient and clinician perspectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients and 12 MS specialists in the United States provided statements describing what an ideal treatment would do to improve symptoms and daily functioning. Statements were sorted by participants into meaningful domains and rated on importance on an 11-point scale. RESULTS: Sixty-four unique statements supporting 6 domains of clustered concepts were generated. Patient and clinician ratings of importance were highly correlated (r=0.82); however, patients rated the domains of Activities of Daily Living, Prevent & Cure, and Address Symptoms as highest in importance, whereas clinicians rated Prevent & Cure, Safe & Effective, and Activities of Daily Living as highest in importance. Statements rated above the domain mean by both patients and clinicians included “Improve cognitive function” and “Improve motor function” in the Activities of Daily Living domain and “Help with memory issues” and “Help preserve cognition” in the Address Symptoms domain. The statement “Improve short term memory” was 1 of 3 statements rated above the domain mean by patients but below the domain mean by clinicians. CONCLUSION: High levels of agreement of concept importance were found between patients and MS specialists, although certain domains and statements were rated more highly by one group. Overall, concepts such as cognitive function, physical and emotional functioning, and activities of daily living were perceived as having great importance for treatment outcomes versus symptom-focused outcomes like gait or tingling sensations. This comprehensive concept model for the MS patient experience can be used for further development of patient-centered outcome measures in MS treatment. Dove 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8126969/ /pubmed/34012257 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052 Text en © 2021 Singer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Singer, Barry A Keith, Shannon Howerter, Amy Doll, Helen Pham, Timothy Mehta, Rina A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title | A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title_full | A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title_fullStr | A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title_full_unstemmed | A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title_short | A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping |
title_sort | study comparing patient and clinician perspectives of treatments for multiple sclerosis via group concept mapping |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012257 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S297052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singerbarrya astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT keithshannon astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT howerteramy astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT dollhelen astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT phamtimothy astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT mehtarina astudycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT singerbarrya studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT keithshannon studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT howerteramy studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT dollhelen studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT phamtimothy studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping AT mehtarina studycomparingpatientandclinicianperspectivesoftreatmentsformultiplesclerosisviagroupconceptmapping |