Cargando…
Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging
Many methods applied to data acquired by various imaging modalities have been evaluated for their benefit in localizing lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) negative epilepsy patients. No approach has proven to be a stand‐alone method with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity. The presented s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33772952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25413 |
_version_ | 1783693895291371520 |
---|---|
author | Mareček, Radek Říha, Pavel Bartoňová, Michaela Kojan, Martin Lamoš, Martin Gajdoš, Martin Vojtíšek, Lubomír Mikl, Michal Bartoň, Marek Doležalová, Irena Pail, Martin Strýček, Ondřej Pažourková, Marta Brázdil, Milan Rektor, Ivan |
author_facet | Mareček, Radek Říha, Pavel Bartoňová, Michaela Kojan, Martin Lamoš, Martin Gajdoš, Martin Vojtíšek, Lubomír Mikl, Michal Bartoň, Marek Doležalová, Irena Pail, Martin Strýček, Ondřej Pažourková, Marta Brázdil, Milan Rektor, Ivan |
author_sort | Mareček, Radek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many methods applied to data acquired by various imaging modalities have been evaluated for their benefit in localizing lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) negative epilepsy patients. No approach has proven to be a stand‐alone method with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity. The presented study addresses the potential benefit of the automated fusion of results of individual methods in presurgical evaluation. We collected electrophysiological, MR, and nuclear imaging data from 137 patients with pharmacoresistant MR‐negative/inconclusive focal epilepsy. A subgroup of 32 patients underwent surgical treatment with known postsurgical outcomes and histopathology. We employed a Gaussian mixture model to reveal several classes of gray matter tissue. Classes specific to epileptogenic tissue were identified and validated using the surgery subgroup divided into two disjoint sets. We evaluated the classification accuracy of the proposed method at a voxel‐wise level and assessed the effect of individual methods. The training of the classifier resulted in six classes of gray matter tissue. We found a subset of two classes specific to tissue located in resected areas. The average classification accuracy (i.e., the probability of correct classification) was significantly higher than the level of chance in the training group (0.73) and even better in the validation surgery subgroup (0.82). Nuclear imaging, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and source localization of interictal epileptic discharges were the strongest methods for classification accuracy. We showed that the automatic fusion of results can identify brain areas that show epileptogenic gray matter tissue features. The method might enhance the presurgical evaluations of MR‐negative epilepsy patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8127142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81271422021-05-21 Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging Mareček, Radek Říha, Pavel Bartoňová, Michaela Kojan, Martin Lamoš, Martin Gajdoš, Martin Vojtíšek, Lubomír Mikl, Michal Bartoň, Marek Doležalová, Irena Pail, Martin Strýček, Ondřej Pažourková, Marta Brázdil, Milan Rektor, Ivan Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Many methods applied to data acquired by various imaging modalities have been evaluated for their benefit in localizing lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) negative epilepsy patients. No approach has proven to be a stand‐alone method with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity. The presented study addresses the potential benefit of the automated fusion of results of individual methods in presurgical evaluation. We collected electrophysiological, MR, and nuclear imaging data from 137 patients with pharmacoresistant MR‐negative/inconclusive focal epilepsy. A subgroup of 32 patients underwent surgical treatment with known postsurgical outcomes and histopathology. We employed a Gaussian mixture model to reveal several classes of gray matter tissue. Classes specific to epileptogenic tissue were identified and validated using the surgery subgroup divided into two disjoint sets. We evaluated the classification accuracy of the proposed method at a voxel‐wise level and assessed the effect of individual methods. The training of the classifier resulted in six classes of gray matter tissue. We found a subset of two classes specific to tissue located in resected areas. The average classification accuracy (i.e., the probability of correct classification) was significantly higher than the level of chance in the training group (0.73) and even better in the validation surgery subgroup (0.82). Nuclear imaging, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and source localization of interictal epileptic discharges were the strongest methods for classification accuracy. We showed that the automatic fusion of results can identify brain areas that show epileptogenic gray matter tissue features. The method might enhance the presurgical evaluations of MR‐negative epilepsy patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8127142/ /pubmed/33772952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25413 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Mareček, Radek Říha, Pavel Bartoňová, Michaela Kojan, Martin Lamoš, Martin Gajdoš, Martin Vojtíšek, Lubomír Mikl, Michal Bartoň, Marek Doležalová, Irena Pail, Martin Strýček, Ondřej Pažourková, Marta Brázdil, Milan Rektor, Ivan Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33772952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marecekradek automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT rihapavel automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT bartonovamichaela automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT kojanmartin automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT lamosmartin automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT gajdosmartin automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT vojtiseklubomir automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT miklmichal automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT bartonmarek automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT dolezalovairena automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT pailmartin automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT strycekondrej automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT pazourkovamarta automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT brazdilmilan automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging AT rektorivan automatedfusionofmultimodalimagingdataforidentifyingepileptogeniclesionsinpatientswithinconclusivemagneticresonanceimaging |