Cargando…
Rationalising animal research synthesis in orthopaedic literature
Systematic reviews in orthopaedic literature are frequently criticised for offering inconsistent conclusions. On top of that, high-quality randomized human evidence on crucial orthopaedic topics is more often than not lacking. In this situation, pooling animal literature could offer an excellent ins...
Autores principales: | Tsikopoulos, Konstantinos, Sidiropoulos, Konstantinos, Kitridis, Dimitrios, Drago, Lorenzo, Ebnezar, Rakesh, Lavalette, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.75 |
Ejemplares similares
-
In vitro laboratory infection research in orthopaedics: Why, when, and how
por: Tsikopoulos, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Network meta-analyses: Methodological prerequisites and clinical usefulness
por: Christofilos, Savvas Ilias, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Viral infections in orthopedics: A systematic review and classification proposal
por: Sidiropoulos, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comment on Oldrini et al. PHILOS Synthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures Has High Complications and Reintervention Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life 2022, 12, 311
por: Sidiropoulos, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Percutaneous Fixation for Traumatic Symphysis Pubis Disruption—Are the Results Superior Compared to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes
por: Kitridis, Dimitrios, et al.
Publicado: (2023)