Cargando…

RNA m(6)A methylation regulates virus–host interaction and EBNA2 expression during Epstein–Barr virus infection

INTRODUCTION: N(6)‐methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most prevalent modification that occurs in messenger RNA (mRNA), affecting mRNA splicing, translation, and stability. This modification is reversible, and its related biological functions are mediated by “writers,” “erasers,” and “readers.” The field...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xiang, Wang, Jia, Zhang, Xiaoyue, Fu, Yuxin, Peng, Qiu, Lu, Jianhong, Wei, Lingyu, Li, Zhengshuo, Liu, Can, Wu, Yangge, Yan, Qun, Ma, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33434416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.396
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: N(6)‐methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most prevalent modification that occurs in messenger RNA (mRNA), affecting mRNA splicing, translation, and stability. This modification is reversible, and its related biological functions are mediated by “writers,” “erasers,” and “readers.” The field of viral epitranscriptomics and the role of m(6)A modification in virus–host interaction have attracted much attention recently. When Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infects a human B lymphocyte, it goes through three phases: the pre‐latent phase, latent phase, and lytic phase. Little is known about the viral and cellular m(6)A epitranscriptomes in EBV infection, especially in the pre‐latent phase during de novo infection. METHODS: Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP‐seq) and MeRIP‐RT‐qPCR were used to determine the m(6)A‐modified transcripts during de novo EBV infection. RIP assay was used to confirm the binding of EBNA2 and m(6)A readers. Quantitative reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR) and Western blot analysis were performed to test the effect of m(6)A on the host and viral gene expression. RESULTS: Here, we provided mechanistic insights by examining the viral and cellular m(6)A epitranscriptomes during de novo EBV infection, which is in the pre‐latent phase. EBV EBNA2 and BHRF1 were highly m(6)A‐modified upon EBV infection. Knockdown of METTL3 (a “writer”) decreased EBNA2 expression levels. The emergent m(6)A modifications induced by EBV infection preferentially distributed in 3ʹ untranslated regions of cellular transcripts, while the lost m(6)A modifications induced by EBV infection preferentially distributed in coding sequence regions of mRNAs. EBV infection could influence the host cellular m(6)A epitranscriptome. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal the critical role of m(6)A modification in the process of de novo EBV infection.