Cargando…

Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review

The link between folate deficiency and congenital spina bifida defects was first suggested in the 1960s. Although the prevention of these defects by preconception folic acid supplementation was confirmed in a large multi-centre controlled trial in 1991, its subsequent implementation as health educat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: House, Simon H, Nichols, John AA, Rae, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270420980875
_version_ 1783694010037043200
author House, Simon H
Nichols, John AA
Rae, Sarah
author_facet House, Simon H
Nichols, John AA
Rae, Sarah
author_sort House, Simon H
collection PubMed
description The link between folate deficiency and congenital spina bifida defects was first suggested in the 1960s. Although the prevention of these defects by preconception folic acid supplementation was confirmed in a large multi-centre controlled trial in 1991, its subsequent implementation as health education advice has made very little difference. North America’s policy of folic acid fortification of flour and bread has had a beneficial impact. No European country has implemented fortification due to concern over possible adverse effects on older subjects, but a recent review shows these to be largely hypothetical and far outweighed by beneficial effects. Recent research by Menezo et al. has, however, shown that folic acid is ineffective for some women with severe fertility problems including recurrent miscarriage and failed in vitro fertilisation. There is a genetically determined bottleneck (677TT) in their folate metabolism that can be successfully overridden by going straight to the next step in the metabolic pathway and taking 5-methylytetrahydrofolate, as a preconception supplement. Menezo suggests that all women with fertility problems should be tested for 677TT. If fortification of flour and bread is to be implemented in the UK, there should be monitoring for possible adverse effects including the incidence of colorectal cancers and cognitive decline. In conclusion, whilst there are concerns that fortification could have a detrimental effect on these conditions, there is sound evidence that it would have much greater beneficial effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8127769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81277692021-05-24 Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review House, Simon H Nichols, John AA Rae, Sarah JRSM Open Clinical Review The link between folate deficiency and congenital spina bifida defects was first suggested in the 1960s. Although the prevention of these defects by preconception folic acid supplementation was confirmed in a large multi-centre controlled trial in 1991, its subsequent implementation as health education advice has made very little difference. North America’s policy of folic acid fortification of flour and bread has had a beneficial impact. No European country has implemented fortification due to concern over possible adverse effects on older subjects, but a recent review shows these to be largely hypothetical and far outweighed by beneficial effects. Recent research by Menezo et al. has, however, shown that folic acid is ineffective for some women with severe fertility problems including recurrent miscarriage and failed in vitro fertilisation. There is a genetically determined bottleneck (677TT) in their folate metabolism that can be successfully overridden by going straight to the next step in the metabolic pathway and taking 5-methylytetrahydrofolate, as a preconception supplement. Menezo suggests that all women with fertility problems should be tested for 677TT. If fortification of flour and bread is to be implemented in the UK, there should be monitoring for possible adverse effects including the incidence of colorectal cancers and cognitive decline. In conclusion, whilst there are concerns that fortification could have a detrimental effect on these conditions, there is sound evidence that it would have much greater beneficial effects. SAGE Publications 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8127769/ /pubmed/34035929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270420980875 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Review
House, Simon H
Nichols, John AA
Rae, Sarah
Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title_full Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title_fullStr Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title_full_unstemmed Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title_short Folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
title_sort folates, folic acid and preconception care – a review
topic Clinical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270420980875
work_keys_str_mv AT housesimonh folatesfolicacidandpreconceptioncareareview
AT nicholsjohnaa folatesfolicacidandpreconceptioncareareview
AT raesarah folatesfolicacidandpreconceptioncareareview