Cargando…
How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation
In increasingly constrained health and aged care services, strategies are needed to improve quality and translate evidence into practice. In dementia care, recent failures in quality and safety have led the WHO to prioritise the translation of known evidence into practice. While quality improvement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147 |
_version_ | 1783694034470961152 |
---|---|
author | de la Perrelle, Lenore Cations, Monica Barbery, Gaery Radisic, Gorjana Kaambwa, Billingsley Crotty, Maria Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke Kurrle, Susan Cameron, Ian Whitehead, Craig Thompson, Jane Laver, Kate |
author_facet | de la Perrelle, Lenore Cations, Monica Barbery, Gaery Radisic, Gorjana Kaambwa, Billingsley Crotty, Maria Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke Kurrle, Susan Cameron, Ian Whitehead, Craig Thompson, Jane Laver, Kate |
author_sort | de la Perrelle, Lenore |
collection | PubMed |
description | In increasingly constrained health and aged care services, strategies are needed to improve quality and translate evidence into practice. In dementia care, recent failures in quality and safety have led the WHO to prioritise the translation of known evidence into practice. While quality improvement collaboratives have been widely used in healthcare, there are few examples in dementia care. We describe a recent quality improvement collaborative to improve dementia care across Australia and assess the implementation outcomes of acceptability and feasibility of this strategy to translate known evidence into practice. A realist-informed process evaluation was used to analyse how, why and under what circumstances a quality improvement collaborative built knowledge and skills in clinicians working in dementia care. This realist-informed process evaluation developed, tested and refined the programme theory of a quality improvement collaborative. Data were collected pre-intervention and post-intervention using surveys and interviews with participants (n=28). A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process integrated three frameworks to examine the context and mechanisms of knowledge and skill building in participant clinicians. A refined program theory showed how and why clinicians built knowledge and skills in quality improvement in dementia care. Six mechanisms were identified: motivation, accountability, identity, collective learning, credibility and reflective practice. These mechanisms, in combination, operated to overcome constraints, role boundaries and pessimism about improved practice in dementia care. A quality improvement collaborative designed for clinicians in different contexts and roles was acceptable and feasible in building knowledge, skills and confidence of clinicians to improve dementia care. Supportive reflective practice and a credible, flexible and collaborative process optimised quality improvement knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia. Trial registration number ACTRN12618000268246. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8127967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81279672021-05-26 How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation de la Perrelle, Lenore Cations, Monica Barbery, Gaery Radisic, Gorjana Kaambwa, Billingsley Crotty, Maria Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke Kurrle, Susan Cameron, Ian Whitehead, Craig Thompson, Jane Laver, Kate BMJ Open Qual Original Research In increasingly constrained health and aged care services, strategies are needed to improve quality and translate evidence into practice. In dementia care, recent failures in quality and safety have led the WHO to prioritise the translation of known evidence into practice. While quality improvement collaboratives have been widely used in healthcare, there are few examples in dementia care. We describe a recent quality improvement collaborative to improve dementia care across Australia and assess the implementation outcomes of acceptability and feasibility of this strategy to translate known evidence into practice. A realist-informed process evaluation was used to analyse how, why and under what circumstances a quality improvement collaborative built knowledge and skills in clinicians working in dementia care. This realist-informed process evaluation developed, tested and refined the programme theory of a quality improvement collaborative. Data were collected pre-intervention and post-intervention using surveys and interviews with participants (n=28). A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process integrated three frameworks to examine the context and mechanisms of knowledge and skill building in participant clinicians. A refined program theory showed how and why clinicians built knowledge and skills in quality improvement in dementia care. Six mechanisms were identified: motivation, accountability, identity, collective learning, credibility and reflective practice. These mechanisms, in combination, operated to overcome constraints, role boundaries and pessimism about improved practice in dementia care. A quality improvement collaborative designed for clinicians in different contexts and roles was acceptable and feasible in building knowledge, skills and confidence of clinicians to improve dementia care. Supportive reflective practice and a credible, flexible and collaborative process optimised quality improvement knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia. Trial registration number ACTRN12618000268246. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8127967/ /pubmed/33990392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research de la Perrelle, Lenore Cations, Monica Barbery, Gaery Radisic, Gorjana Kaambwa, Billingsley Crotty, Maria Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke Kurrle, Susan Cameron, Ian Whitehead, Craig Thompson, Jane Laver, Kate How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title | How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title_full | How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title_fullStr | How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title_short | How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation |
title_sort | how, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? a realist informed process evaluation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaperrellelenore howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT cationsmonica howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT barberygaery howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT radisicgorjana howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT kaambwabillingsley howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT crottymaria howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT fitzgeraldjannaanneke howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT kurrlesusan howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT cameronian howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT whiteheadcraig howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT thompsonjane howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation AT laverkate howwhyandunderwhatcircumstancesdoesaqualityimprovementcollaborativebuildknowledgeandskillsincliniciansworkingwithpeoplewithdementiaarealistinformedprocessevaluation |