Cargando…
Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing
AIMS: This paper describes two patient-reported measures of social contact and loneliness, which are closely related concepts. The first measure (R-Outcomes Social Contact measure) was developed from scratch, based on customer needs and literature review. It covers emotional and social aspects using...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001306 |
_version_ | 1783694036848082944 |
---|---|
author | Benson, Tim Seers, Helen Webb, Nicola McMahon, Philippa |
author_facet | Benson, Tim Seers, Helen Webb, Nicola McMahon, Philippa |
author_sort | Benson, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This paper describes two patient-reported measures of social contact and loneliness, which are closely related concepts. The first measure (R-Outcomes Social Contact measure) was developed from scratch, based on customer needs and literature review. It covers emotional and social aspects using positive terms. The second measure (R-Outcomes Loneliness measure) is adapted from the GSS Loneliness Harmonised Standard. Both measures are patient-reported outcome measures, based on patients’ own perception of how they feel. METHOD: This development started in 2016 in response to customers’ requests to measure social contact/loneliness for patients in social prescribing projects. Both measures are compared with three other loneliness measures (the GSS Loneliness Harmonised Standard, De Jong Gierveld and Campaign to End Loneliness). Both measures are short (36 and 21 words, respectively). Mean improvement is reported as a positive number on a 0–100 scale (where high is good). We tested the psychometric performance and construct validity of the R-Outcomes Social Contact measure using secondary analysis of anonymised data collected before and after social prescribing interventions in one part of Southern England. RESULTS: In the validation study, 728 responses, collected during 2019–2020, were analysed. 90% were over 70 years old and 62% women. Cronbach’s α=0.76, which suggests that it is appropriate to use a single summary score. Mean Social Contact scores before and after social prescribing intervention were 59.9 (before) and 66.7 (after, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analysis shows that measures for social contact, health status, health confidence, patient experience, personal well-being, medication adherence and social determinants of health are correlated but distinct factors. Construct validation shows that the results are consistent with nine hypotheses, based on the loneliness literature. CONCLUSION: The R-Outcomes Social Contact measure has good psychometric and construct validation results in a population referred to social prescribing. It is complementary to other R-Outcomes measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8127978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81279782021-05-26 Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing Benson, Tim Seers, Helen Webb, Nicola McMahon, Philippa BMJ Open Qual Original Research AIMS: This paper describes two patient-reported measures of social contact and loneliness, which are closely related concepts. The first measure (R-Outcomes Social Contact measure) was developed from scratch, based on customer needs and literature review. It covers emotional and social aspects using positive terms. The second measure (R-Outcomes Loneliness measure) is adapted from the GSS Loneliness Harmonised Standard. Both measures are patient-reported outcome measures, based on patients’ own perception of how they feel. METHOD: This development started in 2016 in response to customers’ requests to measure social contact/loneliness for patients in social prescribing projects. Both measures are compared with three other loneliness measures (the GSS Loneliness Harmonised Standard, De Jong Gierveld and Campaign to End Loneliness). Both measures are short (36 and 21 words, respectively). Mean improvement is reported as a positive number on a 0–100 scale (where high is good). We tested the psychometric performance and construct validity of the R-Outcomes Social Contact measure using secondary analysis of anonymised data collected before and after social prescribing interventions in one part of Southern England. RESULTS: In the validation study, 728 responses, collected during 2019–2020, were analysed. 90% were over 70 years old and 62% women. Cronbach’s α=0.76, which suggests that it is appropriate to use a single summary score. Mean Social Contact scores before and after social prescribing intervention were 59.9 (before) and 66.7 (after, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analysis shows that measures for social contact, health status, health confidence, patient experience, personal well-being, medication adherence and social determinants of health are correlated but distinct factors. Construct validation shows that the results are consistent with nine hypotheses, based on the loneliness literature. CONCLUSION: The R-Outcomes Social Contact measure has good psychometric and construct validation results in a population referred to social prescribing. It is complementary to other R-Outcomes measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8127978/ /pubmed/33990393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001306 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Benson, Tim Seers, Helen Webb, Nicola McMahon, Philippa Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title | Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title_full | Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title_fullStr | Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title_short | Development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
title_sort | development of social contact and loneliness measures with validation in social prescribing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33990393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensontim developmentofsocialcontactandlonelinessmeasureswithvalidationinsocialprescribing AT seershelen developmentofsocialcontactandlonelinessmeasureswithvalidationinsocialprescribing AT webbnicola developmentofsocialcontactandlonelinessmeasureswithvalidationinsocialprescribing AT mcmahonphilippa developmentofsocialcontactandlonelinessmeasureswithvalidationinsocialprescribing |