Cargando…

Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review

Intersectoral action (ISA) is considered pivotal for achieving health and societal goals but remains difficult to achieve as it requires complex efforts, resources and coordinated responses from multiple sectors and organizations. While ISA in health is often desired, its potential can be better inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mondal, Shinjini, Van Belle, Sara, Maioni, Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa163
_version_ 1783694042217840640
author Mondal, Shinjini
Van Belle, Sara
Maioni, Antonia
author_facet Mondal, Shinjini
Van Belle, Sara
Maioni, Antonia
author_sort Mondal, Shinjini
collection PubMed
description Intersectoral action (ISA) is considered pivotal for achieving health and societal goals but remains difficult to achieve as it requires complex efforts, resources and coordinated responses from multiple sectors and organizations. While ISA in health is often desired, its potential can be better informed by the advanced theory-building and empirical application in real-world contexts from political science, public administration and environmental sciences. Considering the importance and the associated challenges in achieving ISA, we have conducted a meta-narrative review, in the research domains of political science, public administration, environmental and health. The review aims to identify theory, theoretical concepts and empirical applications of ISA in these identified research traditions and draw learning for health. Using the multidisciplinary database of SCOPUS from 1996 to 2017, 5535 records were identified, 155 full-text articles were reviewed and 57 papers met our final inclusion criteria. In our findings, we trace the theoretical roots of ISA across all research domains, describing the main focus and motivation to pursue collaborative work. The literature synthesis is organized around the following: implementation instruments, formal mechanisms and informal networks, enabling institutional environments involving the interplay of hardware (i.e. resources, management systems, structures) and software (more specifically the realms of ideas, values, power); and the important role of leaders who can work across boundaries in promoting ISA, political mobilization and the essential role of hybrid accountability mechanisms. Overall, our review reaffirms affirms that ISA has both technical and political dimensions. In addition to technical concerns for strengthening capacities and providing support instruments and mechanisms, future research must carefully consider power and inter-organizational dynamics in order to develop a more fulsome understanding and improve the implementation of intersectoral initiatives, as well as to ensure their sustainability. This also shows the need for continued attention to emergent knowledge bases across different research domains including health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81280092021-05-20 Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review Mondal, Shinjini Van Belle, Sara Maioni, Antonia Health Policy Plan Review Intersectoral action (ISA) is considered pivotal for achieving health and societal goals but remains difficult to achieve as it requires complex efforts, resources and coordinated responses from multiple sectors and organizations. While ISA in health is often desired, its potential can be better informed by the advanced theory-building and empirical application in real-world contexts from political science, public administration and environmental sciences. Considering the importance and the associated challenges in achieving ISA, we have conducted a meta-narrative review, in the research domains of political science, public administration, environmental and health. The review aims to identify theory, theoretical concepts and empirical applications of ISA in these identified research traditions and draw learning for health. Using the multidisciplinary database of SCOPUS from 1996 to 2017, 5535 records were identified, 155 full-text articles were reviewed and 57 papers met our final inclusion criteria. In our findings, we trace the theoretical roots of ISA across all research domains, describing the main focus and motivation to pursue collaborative work. The literature synthesis is organized around the following: implementation instruments, formal mechanisms and informal networks, enabling institutional environments involving the interplay of hardware (i.e. resources, management systems, structures) and software (more specifically the realms of ideas, values, power); and the important role of leaders who can work across boundaries in promoting ISA, political mobilization and the essential role of hybrid accountability mechanisms. Overall, our review reaffirms affirms that ISA has both technical and political dimensions. In addition to technical concerns for strengthening capacities and providing support instruments and mechanisms, future research must carefully consider power and inter-organizational dynamics in order to develop a more fulsome understanding and improve the implementation of intersectoral initiatives, as well as to ensure their sustainability. This also shows the need for continued attention to emergent knowledge bases across different research domains including health. Oxford University Press 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8128009/ /pubmed/33564855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa163 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review
Mondal, Shinjini
Van Belle, Sara
Maioni, Antonia
Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title_full Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title_fullStr Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title_short Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
title_sort learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa163
work_keys_str_mv AT mondalshinjini learningfromintersectoralactionbeyondhealthametanarrativereview
AT vanbellesara learningfromintersectoralactionbeyondhealthametanarrativereview
AT maioniantonia learningfromintersectoralactionbeyondhealthametanarrativereview