Cargando…

Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review

Transnational tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food corporations use the international trade regime to prevent policy action on non-communicable diseases (NCDs); i.e. to promote policy ‘non-decisions’. Understanding policy non-decisions can be assisted by identifying power operating in relevant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milsom, Penelope, Smith, Richard, Baker, Phillip, Walls, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa148
_version_ 1783694042916192256
author Milsom, Penelope
Smith, Richard
Baker, Phillip
Walls, Helen
author_facet Milsom, Penelope
Smith, Richard
Baker, Phillip
Walls, Helen
author_sort Milsom, Penelope
collection PubMed
description Transnational tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food corporations use the international trade regime to prevent policy action on non-communicable diseases (NCDs); i.e. to promote policy ‘non-decisions’. Understanding policy non-decisions can be assisted by identifying power operating in relevant decision-making spaces, but trade and health research rarely explicitly engages with theories of power. This realist review aimed to synthesize evidence of different forms and mechanisms of power active in trade and health decision-making spaces to understand better why NCD policy non-decisions persist and the implications for future transformative action. We iteratively developed power-based theories explaining how transnational health-harmful commodity corporations (THCCs) utilize the international trade regime to encourage NCD policy non-decisions. To support theory development, we also developed a conceptual framework for analysing power in public health policymaking. We searched six databases and relevant grey literature and extracted, synthesized and mapped the evidence against the proposed theories. One hundred and four studies were included. Findings were presented for three key forms of power. Evidence indicates THCCs attempt to exercise instrumental power by extensive lobbying often via privileged access to trade and health decision-making spaces. When their legitimacy declines, THCCs have attempted to shift decision-making to more favourable international trade legal venues. THCCs benefit from structural power through the institutionalization of their involvement in health and trade agenda-setting processes. In terms of discursive power, THCCs effectively frame trade and health issues in ways that echo and amplify dominant neoliberal ideas. These processes may further entrench the individualization of NCDs, restrict conceivable policy solutions and perpetuate policymaking norms that privilege economic/trade interests over health. This review identifies different forms and mechanisms of power active in trade and health policy spaces that enable THCCs to prevent progressive action on NCDs. It also points to potential strategies for challenging these power dynamics and relations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81280132021-05-20 Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review Milsom, Penelope Smith, Richard Baker, Phillip Walls, Helen Health Policy Plan Review Transnational tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food corporations use the international trade regime to prevent policy action on non-communicable diseases (NCDs); i.e. to promote policy ‘non-decisions’. Understanding policy non-decisions can be assisted by identifying power operating in relevant decision-making spaces, but trade and health research rarely explicitly engages with theories of power. This realist review aimed to synthesize evidence of different forms and mechanisms of power active in trade and health decision-making spaces to understand better why NCD policy non-decisions persist and the implications for future transformative action. We iteratively developed power-based theories explaining how transnational health-harmful commodity corporations (THCCs) utilize the international trade regime to encourage NCD policy non-decisions. To support theory development, we also developed a conceptual framework for analysing power in public health policymaking. We searched six databases and relevant grey literature and extracted, synthesized and mapped the evidence against the proposed theories. One hundred and four studies were included. Findings were presented for three key forms of power. Evidence indicates THCCs attempt to exercise instrumental power by extensive lobbying often via privileged access to trade and health decision-making spaces. When their legitimacy declines, THCCs have attempted to shift decision-making to more favourable international trade legal venues. THCCs benefit from structural power through the institutionalization of their involvement in health and trade agenda-setting processes. In terms of discursive power, THCCs effectively frame trade and health issues in ways that echo and amplify dominant neoliberal ideas. These processes may further entrench the individualization of NCDs, restrict conceivable policy solutions and perpetuate policymaking norms that privilege economic/trade interests over health. This review identifies different forms and mechanisms of power active in trade and health policy spaces that enable THCCs to prevent progressive action on NCDs. It also points to potential strategies for challenging these power dynamics and relations. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8128013/ /pubmed/33276385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa148 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Milsom, Penelope
Smith, Richard
Baker, Phillip
Walls, Helen
Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title_full Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title_fullStr Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title_full_unstemmed Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title_short Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
title_sort corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa148
work_keys_str_mv AT milsompenelope corporatepowerandtheinternationaltraderegimepreventingprogressivepolicyactiononnoncommunicablediseasesarealistreview
AT smithrichard corporatepowerandtheinternationaltraderegimepreventingprogressivepolicyactiononnoncommunicablediseasesarealistreview
AT bakerphillip corporatepowerandtheinternationaltraderegimepreventingprogressivepolicyactiononnoncommunicablediseasesarealistreview
AT wallshelen corporatepowerandtheinternationaltraderegimepreventingprogressivepolicyactiononnoncommunicablediseasesarealistreview