Cargando…

Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is one of the most common causes of stillbirths. The objective of this study is to develop a machine learning model that will be able to accurately and consistently predict whether the estimated fetal weight (EFW) will be below the 10th percentile at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crockart, I.C., Brink, L.T., du Plessis, C., Odendaal, H.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100533
_version_ 1783694062999568384
author Crockart, I.C.
Brink, L.T.
du Plessis, C.
Odendaal, H.J.
author_facet Crockart, I.C.
Brink, L.T.
du Plessis, C.
Odendaal, H.J.
author_sort Crockart, I.C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is one of the most common causes of stillbirths. The objective of this study is to develop a machine learning model that will be able to accurately and consistently predict whether the estimated fetal weight (EFW) will be below the 10th percentile at 34+0–37 + 6 week’s gestation stage, by using data collected at 20 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks gestation. METHODS: Recruitment for the prospective Safe Passage Study (SPS) was done over 7.5 years (2007–2015). An essential part of the fetal assessment was the non-invasive transabdominal recording of the maternal and fetal electrocardiograms as well as the performance of an ultrasound examination for Doppler flow velocity waveforms and fetal biometry at 20 + 0 to 23 + 6 and 34 + 0 to 37 + 6 week’s gestation. Several predictive models were constructed, using supervised learning techniques, and evaluated using the Stochastic Gradient Descent, k-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression and Random Forest methods. RESULTS: The final model performed exceptionally well across all evaluation metrics, particularly so for the Stochastic Gradient Descent method: achieving a 93% average for Classification Accuracy, Recall, Precision and F1-Score when random sampling is used and 91% for cross-validation (both methods using a 95% confidence interval). Furthermore, the model identifies the Umbilical Artery Pulsality Index to be the strongest identifier for the prediction of IUGR – matching the literature. Three of the four evaluation methods used achieved above 90% for both True Negative and True Positive results. The ROC Analysis showed a very strong True Positive rate (y-axis) for both target attribute outcomes – AUC value of 0.771. CONCLUSIONS: The model performs exceptionally well in all evaluation metrics, showing robustness and flexibility as a predictive model for the binary target attribute of IUGR. This accuracy is likely due to the value added by the pre-processed features regarding the fetal gained beats and accelerations, something otherwise absent from previous multi-disciplinary studies. The success of the proposed predictive model allows the pursuit of further birth-related anomalies, providing a foundation for more complex models and lesser-researched subject matter. The data available for this model was a vital part of its success but might also become a limiting factor for further analyses. Further development of similar models could result in better classification performance even with little data available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81281402021-05-17 Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models Crockart, I.C. Brink, L.T. du Plessis, C. Odendaal, H.J. Inform Med Unlocked Article OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is one of the most common causes of stillbirths. The objective of this study is to develop a machine learning model that will be able to accurately and consistently predict whether the estimated fetal weight (EFW) will be below the 10th percentile at 34+0–37 + 6 week’s gestation stage, by using data collected at 20 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks gestation. METHODS: Recruitment for the prospective Safe Passage Study (SPS) was done over 7.5 years (2007–2015). An essential part of the fetal assessment was the non-invasive transabdominal recording of the maternal and fetal electrocardiograms as well as the performance of an ultrasound examination for Doppler flow velocity waveforms and fetal biometry at 20 + 0 to 23 + 6 and 34 + 0 to 37 + 6 week’s gestation. Several predictive models were constructed, using supervised learning techniques, and evaluated using the Stochastic Gradient Descent, k-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression and Random Forest methods. RESULTS: The final model performed exceptionally well across all evaluation metrics, particularly so for the Stochastic Gradient Descent method: achieving a 93% average for Classification Accuracy, Recall, Precision and F1-Score when random sampling is used and 91% for cross-validation (both methods using a 95% confidence interval). Furthermore, the model identifies the Umbilical Artery Pulsality Index to be the strongest identifier for the prediction of IUGR – matching the literature. Three of the four evaluation methods used achieved above 90% for both True Negative and True Positive results. The ROC Analysis showed a very strong True Positive rate (y-axis) for both target attribute outcomes – AUC value of 0.771. CONCLUSIONS: The model performs exceptionally well in all evaluation metrics, showing robustness and flexibility as a predictive model for the binary target attribute of IUGR. This accuracy is likely due to the value added by the pre-processed features regarding the fetal gained beats and accelerations, something otherwise absent from previous multi-disciplinary studies. The success of the proposed predictive model allows the pursuit of further birth-related anomalies, providing a foundation for more complex models and lesser-researched subject matter. The data available for this model was a vital part of its success but might also become a limiting factor for further analyses. Further development of similar models could result in better classification performance even with little data available. 2021-02-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8128140/ /pubmed/34007875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100533 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Crockart, I.C.
Brink, L.T.
du Plessis, C.
Odendaal, H.J.
Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title_full Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title_fullStr Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title_full_unstemmed Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title_short Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
title_sort classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34–38 weeks gestation with machine learning models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100533
work_keys_str_mv AT crockartic classificationofintrauterinegrowthrestrictionat3438weeksgestationwithmachinelearningmodels
AT brinklt classificationofintrauterinegrowthrestrictionat3438weeksgestationwithmachinelearningmodels
AT duplessisc classificationofintrauterinegrowthrestrictionat3438weeksgestationwithmachinelearningmodels
AT odendaalhj classificationofintrauterinegrowthrestrictionat3438weeksgestationwithmachinelearningmodels