Cargando…

The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of pulpotomized premolars with mesioocclusodistal (MOD) cavities treated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghahramani, Yasamin, Shafiei, Fereshteh, Jowkar, Zahra, Kazemian, Sepideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590911
_version_ 1783694134767255552
author Ghahramani, Yasamin
Shafiei, Fereshteh
Jowkar, Zahra
Kazemian, Sepideh
author_facet Ghahramani, Yasamin
Shafiei, Fereshteh
Jowkar, Zahra
Kazemian, Sepideh
author_sort Ghahramani, Yasamin
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of pulpotomized premolars with mesioocclusodistal (MOD) cavities treated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eight sound extracted maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 12). The teeth in group 1 did not receive any preparation. Class II MOD cavities were prepared in the other experimental groups. In groups 2, 4, 6, and 8, tooth-colored MTA was used for pulpotomy. In groups 3, 5, 7, and 9, CEM cement was used for pulpotomy. Groups 2 and 3 were left unrestored. Groups 4 and 5 were restored with amalgam. Groups 6 and 7 were restored with a conventional composite resin, and groups 8 and 9 were restored with bulk-fill giomers. Fracture resistance was measured, the fracture pattern of each specimen was assessed, and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The fracture resistance of group 1 was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of group 2 (MTA + amalgam) was statistically lower than those of all experimental groups (p values < 0.05) except groups 3, 4, and 5 (p values > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups restored with amalgam, conventional composite resin, and bulk-fill giomer (groups 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) (p values < 0.05). The highest rate of mode 1 fracture (restorable fracture) was observed in group 1 followed by groups 8 and 9. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found among the fracture resistances of the restored teeth using various restorative techniques. Bulk-fill giomers followed by conventional composite resin were better able to prevent unfavorable fractures compared to amalgam. Therefore, they seem to be more reliable for the restoration of pulpotomized teeth with MOD cavities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81286082021-05-26 The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars Ghahramani, Yasamin Shafiei, Fereshteh Jowkar, Zahra Kazemian, Sepideh Int J Dent Research Article AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of pulpotomized premolars with mesioocclusodistal (MOD) cavities treated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eight sound extracted maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 12). The teeth in group 1 did not receive any preparation. Class II MOD cavities were prepared in the other experimental groups. In groups 2, 4, 6, and 8, tooth-colored MTA was used for pulpotomy. In groups 3, 5, 7, and 9, CEM cement was used for pulpotomy. Groups 2 and 3 were left unrestored. Groups 4 and 5 were restored with amalgam. Groups 6 and 7 were restored with a conventional composite resin, and groups 8 and 9 were restored with bulk-fill giomers. Fracture resistance was measured, the fracture pattern of each specimen was assessed, and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The fracture resistance of group 1 was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of group 2 (MTA + amalgam) was statistically lower than those of all experimental groups (p values < 0.05) except groups 3, 4, and 5 (p values > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups restored with amalgam, conventional composite resin, and bulk-fill giomer (groups 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) (p values < 0.05). The highest rate of mode 1 fracture (restorable fracture) was observed in group 1 followed by groups 8 and 9. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found among the fracture resistances of the restored teeth using various restorative techniques. Bulk-fill giomers followed by conventional composite resin were better able to prevent unfavorable fractures compared to amalgam. Therefore, they seem to be more reliable for the restoration of pulpotomized teeth with MOD cavities. Hindawi 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8128608/ /pubmed/34046063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590911 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yasamin Ghahramani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghahramani, Yasamin
Shafiei, Fereshteh
Jowkar, Zahra
Kazemian, Sepideh
The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title_full The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title_fullStr The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title_short The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars
title_sort effects of various restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of pulpotomized permanent premolars
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590911
work_keys_str_mv AT ghahramaniyasamin theeffectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT shafieifereshteh theeffectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT jowkarzahra theeffectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT kazemiansepideh theeffectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT ghahramaniyasamin effectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT shafieifereshteh effectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT jowkarzahra effectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars
AT kazemiansepideh effectsofvariousrestorativetechniquesonthefractureresistanceofpulpotomizedpermanentpremolars