Cargando…
To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines)
ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (AI) has made impressive progress over the past few years, including many applications in medical imaging. Numerous commercial solutions based on AI techniques are now available for sale, forcing radiology practices to learn how to properly assess these tools. While...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07684-x |
_version_ | 1783694156839780352 |
---|---|
author | Omoumi, Patrick Ducarouge, Alexis Tournier, Antoine Harvey, Hugh Kahn, Charles E. Louvet-de Verchère, Fanny Pinto Dos Santos, Daniel Kober, Tobias Richiardi, Jonas |
author_facet | Omoumi, Patrick Ducarouge, Alexis Tournier, Antoine Harvey, Hugh Kahn, Charles E. Louvet-de Verchère, Fanny Pinto Dos Santos, Daniel Kober, Tobias Richiardi, Jonas |
author_sort | Omoumi, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (AI) has made impressive progress over the past few years, including many applications in medical imaging. Numerous commercial solutions based on AI techniques are now available for sale, forcing radiology practices to learn how to properly assess these tools. While several guidelines describing good practices for conducting and reporting AI-based research in medicine and radiology have been published, fewer efforts have focused on recommendations addressing the key questions to consider when critically assessing AI solutions before purchase. Commercial AI solutions are typically complicated software products, for the evaluation of which many factors are to be considered. In this work, authors from academia and industry have joined efforts to propose a practical framework that will help stakeholders evaluate commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) and reach an informed decision. Topics to consider in the evaluation include the relevance of the solution from the point of view of each stakeholder, issues regarding performance and validation, usability and integration, regulatory and legal aspects, and financial and support services. KEY POINTS: • Numerous commercial solutions based on artificial intelligence techniques are now available for sale, and radiology practices have to learn how to properly assess these tools. • We propose a framework focusing on practical points to consider when assessing an AI solution in medical imaging, allowing all stakeholders to conduct relevant discussions with manufacturers and reach an informed decision as to whether to purchase an AI commercial solution for imaging applications. • Topics to consider in the evaluation include the relevance of the solution from the point of view of each stakeholder, issues regarding performance and validation, usability and integration, regulatory and legal aspects, and financial and support services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07684-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8128726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81287262021-05-24 To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) Omoumi, Patrick Ducarouge, Alexis Tournier, Antoine Harvey, Hugh Kahn, Charles E. Louvet-de Verchère, Fanny Pinto Dos Santos, Daniel Kober, Tobias Richiardi, Jonas Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (AI) has made impressive progress over the past few years, including many applications in medical imaging. Numerous commercial solutions based on AI techniques are now available for sale, forcing radiology practices to learn how to properly assess these tools. While several guidelines describing good practices for conducting and reporting AI-based research in medicine and radiology have been published, fewer efforts have focused on recommendations addressing the key questions to consider when critically assessing AI solutions before purchase. Commercial AI solutions are typically complicated software products, for the evaluation of which many factors are to be considered. In this work, authors from academia and industry have joined efforts to propose a practical framework that will help stakeholders evaluate commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) and reach an informed decision. Topics to consider in the evaluation include the relevance of the solution from the point of view of each stakeholder, issues regarding performance and validation, usability and integration, regulatory and legal aspects, and financial and support services. KEY POINTS: • Numerous commercial solutions based on artificial intelligence techniques are now available for sale, and radiology practices have to learn how to properly assess these tools. • We propose a framework focusing on practical points to consider when assessing an AI solution in medical imaging, allowing all stakeholders to conduct relevant discussions with manufacturers and reach an informed decision as to whether to purchase an AI commercial solution for imaging applications. • Topics to consider in the evaluation include the relevance of the solution from the point of view of each stakeholder, issues regarding performance and validation, usability and integration, regulatory and legal aspects, and financial and support services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07684-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8128726/ /pubmed/33666696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07684-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Omoumi, Patrick Ducarouge, Alexis Tournier, Antoine Harvey, Hugh Kahn, Charles E. Louvet-de Verchère, Fanny Pinto Dos Santos, Daniel Kober, Tobias Richiardi, Jonas To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title | To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title_full | To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title_fullStr | To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title_full_unstemmed | To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title_short | To buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines) |
title_sort | to buy or not to buy—evaluating commercial ai solutions in radiology (the eclair guidelines) |
topic | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07684-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omoumipatrick tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT ducarougealexis tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT tournierantoine tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT harveyhugh tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT kahncharlese tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT louvetdevercherefanny tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT pintodossantosdaniel tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT kobertobias tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines AT richiardijonas tobuyornottobuyevaluatingcommercialaisolutionsinradiologytheeclairguidelines |