Cargando…

Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms

A common question in organ regeneration is the extent to which regeneration recapitulates embryonic development. To investigate this concept, we compared the expression of two highly interlinked and essential genes for salivary gland development, Sox9 and Fgf10, during submandibular gland developmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatzeli, Lemonia, Teshima, Tathyane H. N., Hajihosseini, Mohammad K., Gaete, Marcia, Proctor, Gordon B., Tucker, Abigail S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33455001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13387
_version_ 1783694164892844032
author Chatzeli, Lemonia
Teshima, Tathyane H. N.
Hajihosseini, Mohammad K.
Gaete, Marcia
Proctor, Gordon B.
Tucker, Abigail S.
author_facet Chatzeli, Lemonia
Teshima, Tathyane H. N.
Hajihosseini, Mohammad K.
Gaete, Marcia
Proctor, Gordon B.
Tucker, Abigail S.
author_sort Chatzeli, Lemonia
collection PubMed
description A common question in organ regeneration is the extent to which regeneration recapitulates embryonic development. To investigate this concept, we compared the expression of two highly interlinked and essential genes for salivary gland development, Sox9 and Fgf10, during submandibular gland development, homeostasis and regeneration. Salivary gland duct ligation/deligation model was used as a regenerative model. Fgf10 and Sox9 expression changed during regeneration compared to homeostasis, suggesting that these key developmental genes play important roles during regeneration, however, significantly both displayed different patterns of expression in the regenerating gland compared to the developing gland. Regenerating glands, which during homeostasis had very few weakly expressing Sox9‐positive cells in the striated/granular ducts, displayed elevated expression of Sox9 within these ducts. This pattern is in contrast to embryonic development, where Sox9 expression was absent in the proximally developing ducts. However, similar to the elevated expression at the distal tip of the epithelium in developing salivary glands, regenerating glands displayed elevated expression in a subpopulation of acinar cells, which during homeostasis expressed Sox9 at lower levels. A shift in expression of Fgf10 was observed from a widespread mesenchymal pattern during organogenesis to a more limited and predominantly epithelial pattern during homeostasis in the adult. This restricted expression in epithelial cells was maintained during regeneration, with no clear upregulation in the surrounding mesenchyme, as might be expected if regeneration recapitulated development. As both Fgf10 and Sox9 were upregulated in proximal ducts during regeneration, this suggests that the positive regulation of Sox9 by Fgf10, essential during development, is partially reawakened during regeneration using this model. Together these data suggest that developmentally important genes play a key role in salivary gland regeneration but do not precisely mimic the roles observed during development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81287752021-05-21 Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms Chatzeli, Lemonia Teshima, Tathyane H. N. Hajihosseini, Mohammad K. Gaete, Marcia Proctor, Gordon B. Tucker, Abigail S. J Anat Original Papers A common question in organ regeneration is the extent to which regeneration recapitulates embryonic development. To investigate this concept, we compared the expression of two highly interlinked and essential genes for salivary gland development, Sox9 and Fgf10, during submandibular gland development, homeostasis and regeneration. Salivary gland duct ligation/deligation model was used as a regenerative model. Fgf10 and Sox9 expression changed during regeneration compared to homeostasis, suggesting that these key developmental genes play important roles during regeneration, however, significantly both displayed different patterns of expression in the regenerating gland compared to the developing gland. Regenerating glands, which during homeostasis had very few weakly expressing Sox9‐positive cells in the striated/granular ducts, displayed elevated expression of Sox9 within these ducts. This pattern is in contrast to embryonic development, where Sox9 expression was absent in the proximally developing ducts. However, similar to the elevated expression at the distal tip of the epithelium in developing salivary glands, regenerating glands displayed elevated expression in a subpopulation of acinar cells, which during homeostasis expressed Sox9 at lower levels. A shift in expression of Fgf10 was observed from a widespread mesenchymal pattern during organogenesis to a more limited and predominantly epithelial pattern during homeostasis in the adult. This restricted expression in epithelial cells was maintained during regeneration, with no clear upregulation in the surrounding mesenchyme, as might be expected if regeneration recapitulated development. As both Fgf10 and Sox9 were upregulated in proximal ducts during regeneration, this suggests that the positive regulation of Sox9 by Fgf10, essential during development, is partially reawakened during regeneration using this model. Together these data suggest that developmentally important genes play a key role in salivary gland regeneration but do not precisely mimic the roles observed during development. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-16 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8128775/ /pubmed/33455001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13387 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Chatzeli, Lemonia
Teshima, Tathyane H. N.
Hajihosseini, Mohammad K.
Gaete, Marcia
Proctor, Gordon B.
Tucker, Abigail S.
Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title_full Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title_fullStr Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title_short Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
title_sort comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33455001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13387
work_keys_str_mv AT chatzelilemonia comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms
AT teshimatathyanehn comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms
AT hajihosseinimohammadk comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms
AT gaetemarcia comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms
AT proctorgordonb comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms
AT tuckerabigails comparingdevelopmentandregenerationinthesubmandibularglandhighlightsdistinctmechanisms