T1 mapping of the liver and the spleen in patients with liver fibrosis—does normalization to the blood pool increase the predictive value?

PURPOSE: To analyze whether the T1 relaxation time of the liver is a good predictor of significant liver fibrosis and whether normalization to the blood pool improves the predictive value. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between 03/2016 and 02/2018. One hundred seventy-three patients underwent multiparametric liver MRI at 3 T. The T1 relaxation time was measured in the liver and the spleen, in the aorta, the portal vein, and the inferior vena cava (IVC). T1 relaxation times with and without normalization to the blood pool were compared between patients with (n = 26) and without (n = 141) significant liver fibrosis, based on a cutoff value of 3.5 kPa in MRE as the noninvasive reference standard. For statistics, Student’s t test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and Pearson’s correlation were used. RESULTS: The T1 relaxation time of the liver was significantly longer in patients with liver fibrosis, both with and without blood pool normalization (p < 0.001). T1 relaxation time of the liver allowed prediction of significant liver fibrosis (AUC = 0.88), while normalization to the IVC resulted in a slightly lower performance (AUC = 0.82). The lowest performance was achieved when the T1 relaxation times of the liver were normalized to the aorta (AUC = 0.66) and to the portal vein (AUC = 0.62). The T1 relaxation time of the spleen detected significant liver fibrosis with an AUC of 0.68, and 0.51–0.64 with normalization to the blood pool. CONCLUSION: The T1 relaxation time of the liver is a good predictor of significant liver fibrosis. However, normalization of the blood pool did not improve the predictive value. KEY POINTS: • The T1 relaxation time of the liver is a good predictor of significant liver fibrosis. • Normalization to the blood pool did not improve the predictive value of T1 mapping. • If the blood pool normalization was weighted 30% to the aorta and 70% to the portal vein, the performance was better than normalization to the aorta alone but still lower than normalization to the IVC.