Cargando…

MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts

OBJECTIVES: The implant constructs used in scoliosis surgery are often long with a high screw density. Therefore, it is generally believed that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should not be carried out after scoliosis surgery, with the result that computed tomography is often preferred despite the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinrich, Andreas, Reinhold, Maximilian, Güttler, Felix V., Matziolis, Georg, Teichgräber, Ulf K.-M., Zippelius, Timo, Strube, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07546-6
_version_ 1783694174097244160
author Heinrich, Andreas
Reinhold, Maximilian
Güttler, Felix V.
Matziolis, Georg
Teichgräber, Ulf K.-M.
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
author_facet Heinrich, Andreas
Reinhold, Maximilian
Güttler, Felix V.
Matziolis, Georg
Teichgräber, Ulf K.-M.
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
author_sort Heinrich, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The implant constructs used in scoliosis surgery are often long with a high screw density. Therefore, it is generally believed that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should not be carried out after scoliosis surgery, with the result that computed tomography is often preferred despite the ionizing radiation involved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the MRI compatibility of long pedicle-screw-rod constructs at 1.5 T and 3 T using standardized methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). METHODS: Constructs between 130 and 430 mm long were systematically examined according to the ASTM standards F2182 (radio frequency–induced heating), F2119 (susceptibility artifacts), F2213 (magnetically induced torque), and F2052 (magnetically induced displacement force). RESULTS: The maximum heating in the magnetic field was 1.3 K. Heating was significantly influenced by magnetic field strength (p < 0.001), implant length (p = 0.048), and presence of cross-links (p = 0.001). The maximum artifact width for different lengths of the anatomically bent titanium rods with CoCr alloy ranged between 14.77 ± 2.93 mm (TSE) and 17.49 ± 1.82 mm (GRE) for 1.5 T and between 23.67 ± 2.39 mm (TSE) and 27.77 ± 2.37 mm (GRE) for 3 T. TiCP and TiAl showed the smallest and CoCr and CoCr Plus the largest artifact widths. The magnetically induced torque and displacement force were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: MRI following scoliosis surgery with long implant constructs is safe with the patient in supine position. Although susceptibility artifacts can severely limit the diagnostic value, the examination of other regions is possible. KEY POINTS: • Large spinal implants are not necessarily a contraindication for MRI; MR conditional status can be examined according to the ASTM standards F2182, F2119, F2213, and F2052. • A metallic pedicle-screw-rod system could be reliably and safely examined in all combinations of length (130 to 430 mm), configuration, and material in a B(0) at 1.5 T and 3 T. • According to ASTM F2503, the examined pedicle-screw-rod system is MR conditional and especially the young patients can benefit from a non-ionizing radiation MRI examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81288152021-05-24 MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts Heinrich, Andreas Reinhold, Maximilian Güttler, Felix V. Matziolis, Georg Teichgräber, Ulf K.-M. Zippelius, Timo Strube, Patrick Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: The implant constructs used in scoliosis surgery are often long with a high screw density. Therefore, it is generally believed that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should not be carried out after scoliosis surgery, with the result that computed tomography is often preferred despite the ionizing radiation involved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the MRI compatibility of long pedicle-screw-rod constructs at 1.5 T and 3 T using standardized methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). METHODS: Constructs between 130 and 430 mm long were systematically examined according to the ASTM standards F2182 (radio frequency–induced heating), F2119 (susceptibility artifacts), F2213 (magnetically induced torque), and F2052 (magnetically induced displacement force). RESULTS: The maximum heating in the magnetic field was 1.3 K. Heating was significantly influenced by magnetic field strength (p < 0.001), implant length (p = 0.048), and presence of cross-links (p = 0.001). The maximum artifact width for different lengths of the anatomically bent titanium rods with CoCr alloy ranged between 14.77 ± 2.93 mm (TSE) and 17.49 ± 1.82 mm (GRE) for 1.5 T and between 23.67 ± 2.39 mm (TSE) and 27.77 ± 2.37 mm (GRE) for 3 T. TiCP and TiAl showed the smallest and CoCr and CoCr Plus the largest artifact widths. The magnetically induced torque and displacement force were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: MRI following scoliosis surgery with long implant constructs is safe with the patient in supine position. Although susceptibility artifacts can severely limit the diagnostic value, the examination of other regions is possible. KEY POINTS: • Large spinal implants are not necessarily a contraindication for MRI; MR conditional status can be examined according to the ASTM standards F2182, F2119, F2213, and F2052. • A metallic pedicle-screw-rod system could be reliably and safely examined in all combinations of length (130 to 430 mm), configuration, and material in a B(0) at 1.5 T and 3 T. • According to ASTM F2503, the examined pedicle-screw-rod system is MR conditional and especially the young patients can benefit from a non-ionizing radiation MRI examination. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8128815/ /pubmed/33277671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07546-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Heinrich, Andreas
Reinhold, Maximilian
Güttler, Felix V.
Matziolis, Georg
Teichgräber, Ulf K.-M.
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title_full MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title_fullStr MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title_full_unstemmed MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title_short MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
title_sort mri following scoliosis surgery? an analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07546-6
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichandreas mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT reinholdmaximilian mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT guttlerfelixv mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT matziolisgeorg mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT teichgraberulfkm mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT zippeliustimo mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts
AT strubepatrick mrifollowingscoliosissurgeryananalysisofimplantheatingdisplacementtorqueandsusceptibilityartifacts